iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
- 1,600
- Thread starter
- #141
i'll have to check it out."Being There" with Peter Sellers is on TCM I think. (-:yea, he runs for the victim quickly in a passive sort of way.Trump is the prototypical playground bully who will keep refusing to obey rules and calling other people names. He's actively questioning the patriotism of the whistleblower already, even before the person's name is know. That behavior has to be confronted with consequences. But even some gopers were saying "release the transcript." IF he was using his office to discredit an opponent … that's impeachable, and the dems would have no choice … even though Moscow Mitch would have Elaine pull a train on the entire TrumpNation before allowing the Senate to remove Trump regardless of whatever Trump did. But we just weren't to that point, and there's nothing legally or strategically gained by going fast.imo the dems should have waited to see the transcript Trump released, assuming he voluntarily released it, and interview both whomever the whistleblower is and the DOJ official who refused to release the whistleblower information. And then decide if there's something to impeach over.asshat - i am certainly no biden fan nor a fan of the tactics the left keeps pushing demanding their feelz be rewarded. but that is exactly what you are doing here. going after things based off what you hope/wish to be true and then getting all butthurt when people call you on your total lack of proof.
That would have been the wise course. But the Dems are not known for being wise
the saddest part is we simply don't have ANY leader these days who is acting in a dignified manner. we've reduced ourselves to "our idiot isn't as bad as your idiot" and take some jacked up sense of pride in that battle.