Trump To Release Call Transcript

[Blaine Sweeter]

So, I assume you read them. Do you see anything in it that is "odd" at all? or anything that would give you pause to stop and think about?

There were a couple.

First, at the time of the call I do not recall anyone talking about Biden and his son, yet Trump said it was a big thing.

But the bigger issue for me is that he told the Ukraine President to call his personal attorney, a man who has no role in the US government. That makes it a personal favor, and not one being done for the government, in my opinion.

1. Hillary brought up the Biden scandal in 2016 to ensure Joe did not enter the race. It was big at the time, and until now leftist media had been able to bury it / make it go away...until the f*ed up and decide to resurrect it to attack Trump...and did not see how this was going to blow up in their faces.

2. Of course you are desperately reading into it, franticly searching for things that don't add up. The only thing that has to add up is that another Leftist False Accusation of some quid-pro-quo did NOT exist, and the President did NOT engage in Extortion, as Joe confessed to on video.

Yet another 'We've got him now' moment goes down in flames, leaving Dems and snowflakes devastated again.

She DID NOT bring it up to a foreign entity. Do you not understand that Trump has no respect for national security of this country?
Why won't that sink into your incredibly soft skull?

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

Wall Street Journal ramping up on Trump.
And you notice he NEVER calls them fake news.....lolololol

Transcript Shows Trump Asked Ukrainian Counterpart to Look Into Joe Biden’s Son

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

then what would you call posting it 5 times if not hand feeding?

Posting it in enough places for all snowflakes to see it at least ONCE....

That's called spamming, spammer.

 

[iceberg]

So, I assume you read them. Do you see anything in it that is "odd" at all? or anything that would give you pause to stop and think about?

There were a couple.

First, at the time of the call I do not recall anyone talking about Biden and his son, yet Trump said it was a big thing.

But the bigger issue for me is that he told the Ukraine President to call his personal attorney, a man who has no role in the US government. That makes it a personal favor, and not one being done for the government, in my opinion.

1. Hillary brought up the Biden scandal in 2016 to ensure Joe did not enter the race. It was big at the time, and until now leftist media had been able to bury it / make it go away...until the f*ed up and decide to resurrect it to attack Trump...and did not see how this was going to blow up in their faces.

2. Of course you are desperately reading into it, franticly searching for things that don't add up. The only thing that has to add up is that another Leftist False Accusation of some quid-pro-quo did NOT exist, and the President did NOT engage in Extortion, as Joe confessed to on video.

Yet another 'We've got him now' moment goes down in flames, leaving Dems and snowflakes devastated again.

She DID NOT bring it up to a foreign entity. Do you not understand that Trump has no respect for national security of this country?
Why won't that sink into your incredibly soft skull?

maybe he should setup a personal e-mail server and run classified documents through it. when questioned, clean it; like with a cloth.

 

[iceberg]

then what would you call posting it 5 times if not hand feeding?

Posting it in enough places for all snowflakes to see it at least ONCE....

That's called spamming, spammer.

and most of what you post is just stupid trolling.

 

[Oddball]

So, I assume you read them. Do you see anything in it that is "odd" at all? or anything that would give you pause to stop and think about?

There were a couple.

First, at the time of the call I do not recall anyone talking about Biden and his son, yet Trump said it was a big thing.

But the bigger issue for me is that he told the Ukraine President to call his personal attorney, a man who has no role in the US government. That makes it a personal favor, and not one being done for the government, in my opinion.

1. Hillary brought up the Biden scandal in 2016 to ensure Joe did not enter the race. It was big at the time, and until now leftist media had been able to bury it / make it go away...until the f*ed up and decide to resurrect it to attack Trump...and did not see how this was going to blow up in their faces.

2. Of course you are desperately reading into it, franticly searching for things that don't add up. The only thing that has to add up is that another Leftist False Accusation of some quid-pro-quo did NOT exist, and the President did NOT engage in Extortion, as Joe confessed to on video.

Yet another 'We've got him now' moment goes down in flames, leaving Dems and snowflakes devastated again.

She DID NOT bring it up to a foreign entity. Do you not understand that Trump has no respect for national security of this country?
Why won't that sink into your incredibly soft skull?

 

[easyt65]

then what would you call posting it 5 times if not hand feeding?

Posting it in enough places for all snowflakes to see it at least ONCE....

That's called spamming, spammer.

No. As GG demonstrated again for me, snowflakes daily ask for the same links 3 -4 times, day after day after day, living for the moment when you DON'T post it to call it 'fake news'. It's a sad, pathetic tactic, but it almost all they have.

 

[The Original Tree]

'FULL WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINT TO LEAK?'

Leaking is now acceptable to subvert the law and undermine leaders / the President.

House Democrats think the Ukraine whistleblower report will be leaked if it's not 'turned over voluntarily'
- drudge.com headline

...like a screen door on a submarine....and it's all 'justifiable'...

I found the perfect campaign mascot to Trump's 2020 Campaign

 

[Harpy Eagle]

then what would you call posting it 5 times if not hand feeding?

Posting it in enough places for all snowflakes to see it at least ONCE....

That's called spamming, spammer.

No. As GG demonstrated again for me, snowflakes daily ask for the same links 3 -4 times, day after day after day, living for the moment when you DON'T post it to call it 'fake news'. It's a sad, pathetic tactic, but it almost all they have.

I do not tend to go into most of your threads as they are all the same, so it is no surprised that I missed your links.

But then again, I really do not think such a link exist, which is why you are dancing around now

 

[easyt65]

I do not tend to go into most of your threads as they are all the same, so it is no surprised that I missed your links. But then again, I really do not think such a link exist, which is why you are dancing around now

So you avoid most of my posts / threads because they contain links, as opposed to most of your posts, which gives you justification to repeatedly ask for those links and falsely claim they don't exist to begin with.

That's just sad.




'Aaaaaaauuuuuuuuuuuugggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!'

Feel better?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So you avoid most of my posts / threads because they contain links, as opposed to most of your posts, which gives you justification to repeatedly ask for those links and falsely claim they don't exist to begin with.

No, I avoid most of my posts / threads because they are 95% "we got them now" post and threads. Do try and keep up

 

[Kilroy2]

So his son got a job maybe because of his dad position

So you admit conflict of interest, there ya go you agree with me

No I do not admit conflict of interest

If you believe that then what is the conflict of interest.

show me the quid pro quo

show me the comparison like when China grants trademark rights to Ivanka in the mist of a trade war with her father

Do you see the problem here and can you show Biden and son meeting with Ukrainian leaders

The proof is in the pudding

 

[easyt65]

No, I avoid most of my posts / threads because they are 95% "we got them now" post and threads.

How do you know what '95%' of my threads are if you avoid 'MOST' of them?!

Bwuhahahahahaha......facts and math are NOT your strong suit.....

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No, I avoid most of my posts / threads because they are 95% "we got them now" post and threads.

How do you know what '95%' of my threads are if you avoid 'MOST' of them?!

Bwuhahahahahaha......facts and math are NOT your strong suit.....

I did not use to avoid them, I used to go into them to laugh at you. But that has gotten boring so now I just avoid them.

not to mention that most of your thread titles give away the "we got him now" theme.

 

[easyt65]

I did not use to avoid them, I used to go into them to laugh at you. But that has gotten boring so now I just avoid them. not to mention that most of your thread titles give away the "we got him now" theme.

Like with most facts / substantiated things I post, you completely ran away from my question, snowflake:

How do you know what '95%' of my threads are if you avoid 'MOST' of them?!

Exaggeration, false narratives, false claims, false accusations...I just love it when you expose / shoot YOURSELF in the foot for everyone to see.

 

[iceberg]

I did not use to avoid them, I used to go into them to laugh at you. But that has gotten boring so now I just avoid them. not to mention that most of your thread titles give away the "we got him now" theme.

Like with most facts / substantiated things I post, you completely ran away from my question, snowflake:

How do you know what '95%' of my threads are if you avoid 'MOST' of them?!

Exaggeration, false narratives, false claims, false accusations...I just love it when you expose / shoot YOURSELF in the foot for everyone to see.

Well just glad you never exaggerate.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I did not use to avoid them, I used to go into them to laugh at you. But that has gotten boring so now I just avoid them. not to mention that most of your thread titles give away the "we got him now" theme.

Like with most facts / substantiated things I post, you completely ran away from my question, snowflake:

How do you know what '95%' of my threads are if you avoid 'MOST' of them?!

Exaggeration, false narratives, false claims, false accusations...I just love it when you expose / shoot YOURSELF in the foot for everyone to see.

One does not need to watch a porn flick to know it will have sex and nudity in it.

The same holds true for your threads, the titles tell everyone all that is needed to be known about the content

 

[easyt65]

Well just glad you never exaggerate.

Falsely accusing someone of posting 95% of anything while claiming they avoid MOST of what you post is not exaggeration - it is stupidity / inability to do math.

 

[easyt65]

One does not need to watch a porn flick to know it will have sex and nudity in it.

I love watching you squirm, trying to recover from that embarrassing FAIL.



(It will be forgotten much faster if you just drop it and quickly walk away from it instead of reminding people of it over and over and over again. Just sayin'...)
.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

One does not need to watch a porn flick to know it will have sex and nudity in it.

I love watching you squirm, trying to recover from that embarrassing FAIL.



(It will be forgotten much faster if you just drop it and quickly walk away from it instead of reminding people of it over and over and over again. Just sayin'...)
.

you might notice nobody is agreeing with you...