Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolutely NOT, especially since she supposedly had one child for political convenience and use abortions to ensure no more rug rats spoiled her future political plans.a good answer would have straightened out the questioner and dismissed the premise.
hillary would have knocked that question right out of the park.
enlightened leadership, GOP should get some.
of course NYcarbineer isn't interested in that ^ cuz nasty divisiveness suits his anti GOP agenda.
Hillary isn't anti-abortion.
You stick with that story.
According to you, the 'descent answer' to the question of whether someone who breaks the law should be punished' is 'No'.i bet kasich would have been wise enough to give a decent answer.
So you REALLY want to eliminate the woman from the equation, claim that if a woman breaks the law only her 'accomplice' - the doctor - should be held accountable? And I am the dumbass?!...and yet, before Roe vs. Wade, the person doing the abortion was guilty of breaking the law, not that pregnant woman, which puts Trump into a category of a complete dumbass.
And I thought it was only Obama whose idea of 'enforcing the rule of law' was F*ed-up! Turns ot it's the majority of liberals!
Don't enforce the laws you disagree with, and don't hold those who break the law accountable under most circumstances...
Of course that's right. But pointing it out just illustrates that Trump has never actually been anti-choice or pro-life. He's never actually thought through what an absolute ban on abortion would result in, or even bothered to recall what society was like when we tried to have such. All he's doing is channeling the AWG rant and telling the Trumpeters what they want to hear. But, the message is of class, religion, fear, economic loss ..... When it comes to things like what to actually do in the ME, or reproductive rights, or picking judges ... he flounders like a drowning victim.FLASHBACK: Obama tries to force hospitals run by religious institutions to hand out contraceptives and perform abortions as part of Obamacare. In order to take the focus off of the fact that attempting to do so was a violation of the Constitution he and his clown posse started the faux argument that the GOP wanted to prevent all women from having access to contraceptives, which was an incredibly stupid claim to make but one which ignorant/gullible/partisan liberals ate up.Now that Trump has made yet another strike against women in his ongoing marginalization of them, I am sure that we will have to endure a couple of days of condescending comments, such as, "I love women!. They are beautiful!"
Now you have Trump answering the question of whether he believes someone breaking the law should be punished for doing so. By answering 'yes' he thinks someone who breaks the law should be punished' Liberals seek to demonize Trump for his answer because it involves a hypothetical law that they do not like because it is about abortion.
Some things never change.
...and yet, before Roe vs. Wade, the person doing the abortion was guilty of breaking the law, not that pregnant woman, which puts Trump into a category of a complete dumbass. In fact, the only times I have ever heard of a woman being brought before the law for an abortion were a few cases when she self-aborted.
He did answer the question after repeated prodings by Chris. But again, the answer wasn't really wrong it just sounded bad, very unpolitical. IF abortions were illegal then yes, there should be a penalty. That's what illegal means. So he should have ducked it or made it clear. I never saw him as a religious conservative type though and can't imagine it's even on his radar.The GOP is made of a great deal of people and are all over the map regarding abortion. But it's not what presidents do so you won't find one that passed any. Who cares? Only people that care about accuracy. And I didn't say the question was unfair, Matthews is a known item so he got what he deserved.Is endings abortion apart of the GOP platform or not? Who cares when the last President dictated abortion law!? He wants to end abortion but when pressed for details he flubbed. It wasn't an unfair question at all. Considering Trump's many changes of heart concerning the topic it is more than fair.Who was the last president that dictated abortion law?Mathews asking Trump about abortion is unfair in what way?
Donald got what he deserved, yes I believe your right, he just hung himself. He is not a man of integrity and for him to turn this on to Matthews religion , once again he did what he is good at, not answering the questions.
What matters, Jill, are 'Words'.you know truth never matters to rightwingnut trolls.
Remember, only a Democrat can Misspeak, apologize for it and then move on from it. but my gawd, let a Republican do it...
Well, if one were to do something illegal, why wouldn't they be punished?
trump understands that shameless pandering wins emo votes. constitutional principles be damned.
that's not leadership, folks... it's demagoguery.
Because Liberals might not agree with that existing law and thus insist that it simply be ignored.Well, if one were to do something illegal, why wouldn't they be punished?
Quadruple the cells at Angola, and send those aborting women out in to the fields to chop cotton and sugar cane.
Well, if one were to do something illegal, why wouldn't they be punished?
Quadruple the cells at Angola, and send those aborting women out in to the fields to chop cotton and sugar cane.
The answer to the hypothetical question that will never happen - as Matthews knows - was just a 'gotcha' question for liberals to use to attack Trump...mission accomplished.Well, if one were to do something illegal, why wouldn't they be punished?
Quadruple the cells at Angola, and send those aborting women out in to the fields to chop cotton and sugar cane.
But, abortion isn't illegal, nor will it be. So what is your point?
Note: "If it were banned in America"......ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
