jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,155
- 29,121
- 2,180
Nice you even admit, that Trump was directly involved in the development of material, not that he was personally going to make them like him. It is a knowledge transfer and expectations are, one can achieve something if one makes the effort using materials. Again, no guarantee.so the question is did the business file all the proper paperwork to exist? It's very simple. What a paying person does with what they get for their money is basically on them. Was there an expectation that was taken out of context by those people? It seems yes. There is never a guarantee of success. To think there is, is really naive. And that, and that alone will be why no money will be awarded to those suing. they will have to prove the place was at fault. Well that is very difficult in this scenario due to no guarantee of success.A business trying to separate its customers from their money. What a scandal!
Not.
Exactly
And Trump University is a business that was misleadingly advertised and offered a product they didn't deliver. They also targeted those least able to afford their product and used a hard sell to convince them that they would soon be making millions
There is no expectation that you are being outright lied to
People paid the money because they were told that Trump was directly involved in the development of course material, personally chose the instructors and that the instructors were experts in their field
Trump University was an outright fraud
That material is of value, some people did use it and become successful, did you know that? That alone is again a piece of a defense.
Dude these people have no legs on this. Sorry, the AG in NY is a political hack I heard him this morning on a replay of an interview with George Stephanopoulos. He seemed like a real tool.