Anathema
Crotchety Olde Man
He would not rule it out.
Nor should he have. The job of POTUS is to protect and defend this nation against ALL enemies, FOREIGN or DEOMESTIC. If that requires registration, tracking, or internment, so be it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He would not rule it out.
Wow. You are actually the living embodiment of the parody I have been making of left and right tards!Liberals have hinted and hedged at a complete GUN Registry system in the US because 'guns Kill People' or whatever - they're dangerous.
At the same time, while not all Muslims are terrorists it seems almost all terrorists are Muslim...and are dangerous.
So, just throwing this out there, neutrally, for discussion....if we have to register all guns because they and their owners are potentially dangerous then why not register Muslims, who are also potentially dangerous?
Sieg Heil!He would not rule it out.
Nor should he have. The job of POTUS is to protect and defend this nation against ALL enemies, FOREIGN or DEOMESTIC. If that requires registration, tracking, or internment, so be it.
Sieg Heil!
Wow. You are actually the living embodiment of the parody I have been making of left and right tards!
LIBTARD: Guns just killed some more people. We must ban them.
RUBE: Cars kill a lot more people than guns. So I guess we should ban them, too, right? Right? Right?
FOX NEWS: Some more Muslims just killed some more people. Every time any Muslim anywhere kills someone, we will be right here to tell you all about it, with doom music.
RUBE: WE MUST BAN MUSLIMS!!!
Sounds to me like you should be a libertarian...Wow. You are actually the living embodiment of the parody I have been making of left and right tards!Liberals have hinted and hedged at a complete GUN Registry system in the US because 'guns Kill People' or whatever - they're dangerous.
At the same time, while not all Muslims are terrorists it seems almost all terrorists are Muslim...and are dangerous.
So, just throwing this out there, neutrally, for discussion....if we have to register all guns because they and their owners are potentially dangerous then why not register Muslims, who are also potentially dangerous?
LIBTARD: Guns just killed some more people. We must ban them.
RUBE: Cars kill a lot more people than guns. So I guess we should ban them, too, right? Right? Right?
FOX NEWS: Some more Muslims just killed some more people. Every time any Muslim anywhere kills someone, we will be right here to tell you all about it, with doom music.
RUBE: WE MUST BAN MUSLIMS!!!
Trump actually said it twice, the first time was a sit down interview with Yahoo the day before.Still, he said no such thing... Your cherry picking“We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely,” Trump said when presented with the idea.
You should take your own advice rather than parrot your MessiahRushie.Listen to what he said, not what the POS reporter said trump said...
I've never "ruled out" registering Muslims either. Nor have I "ruled out" painting my house orange. Nor sticking a pencil through my hand.He was asked leading questions, and did not rule out registering Muslims or making them carry special identification.
Instead of kicking the reporter in the nuts for even suggesting such a thing, he did not rule it out.
Did he specifically say that?? I don't think so, The medias little gotcha questions are getting a little tired don't you think??Trump actually said it twice, the first time was a sit down interview with Yahoo the day before.Still, he said no such thing... Your cherry picking“We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely,” Trump said when presented with the idea.
Trump crosses new line, endorses database for Muslim Americans
Did he specifically say that?? I don't think so, The medias little gotcha questions are getting a little tired don't you think??Trump actually said it twice, the first time was a sit down interview with Yahoo the day before.Still, he said no such thing... Your cherry picking“We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely,” Trump said when presented with the idea.
Trump crosses new line, endorses database for Muslim Americans
You obviously didn't watch the video where the recording of the Yahoo sit down interview was played. What you call a "gotcha" question was an attempt for Trump to clarify his previous database statement.Did he specifically say that?? I don't think so, The medias little gotcha questions are getting a little tired don't you think??Trump actually said it twice, the first time was a sit down interview with Yahoo the day before.Still, he said no such thing... Your cherry picking“We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely,” Trump said when presented with the idea.
Trump crosses new line, endorses database for Muslim Americans
You have it ass backwards. The Yahoo sit down interview was the day before, the follow up at the campaign event the next day was a NBC reporter.Did he specifically say that?? I don't think so, The medias little gotcha questions are getting a little tired don't you think??Trump actually said it twice, the first time was a sit down interview with Yahoo the day before.Still, he said no such thing... Your cherry picking“We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely,” Trump said when presented with the idea.
Trump crosses new line, endorses database for Muslim Americans
It's astounding how many believe Trump did say it, even after it's been pointed out it was taken out of context and Yahoo's "reporter" interjected his/her own venom. Then left turds wonder why we think they are gullible sheep