Trumps "immunity" defence is punctured by the first question

[BackAgain]

The Commander In Chief has the authority to order military units to attack enemies. The President can do so without approval of Congress. And as such has the authority to decide who's a treat to national security.

There you go "outer boundaries"

Just like saying that lying about what the DOJ is telling you so you can insist the election was stolen from you. Ignoring the findings of over sixty judges, and claiming the VP can ignore the certified election results because he unilaterally decides he doesn't believe the results. Is simply an expression of a President's duty to ensure a free and fair election.


Motivated reasoning is a powerful thing. And if you don't care about the credibility of the argument by stating "outer boundaries" of presidential duty you can basically justify most anything.

Facile faux analysis.

Striking an enemy is not akin to murdering an American political opponent.

Your fail is massive. And you’re a joke.

 

[Godboy]

What laws did he break ?

Trump? None that i can see.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump? None that i can see.

That's cultism for ya!

 

[rightwinger]

The proof is the fact that Obama did it. There is no dispute of that.

Obama openly admits he attacked terrorists.
If you think that is a crime, you are welcome to take it to a Grand Jury

All Trumps charges went to a Grand Jury and he was indicted on 91 Charges

 

[Godboy]

Obama openly admits he attacked terrorists.
If you think that is a crime, you are welcome to take it to a Grand Jury

All Trumps charges went to a Grand Jury and he was indicted on 91 Charges

When has an American terrorist ever been droned? We didnt drone the Boston bombers. We didnt drone the Unibomber. Americans have rights.

 

[rightwinger]

When has an American terrorist ever been droned? We didnt drone the Boston bombers. We didnt drone the Unibomber. Americans have rights.

Again, if Obama was guilty of a crime…take him to a Grand Jury and indict him

Obama is not above the law and neither is Trump

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I will be defending the Capital not storming it violently, moron.

Sure you will skipper.

 

[Lastamender]

Again, if Obama was guilty of a crime…take him to a Grand Jury and indict him

Obama is not above the law and neither is Trump

The Senate has to find him guilty first. He has presidential immunity. See how that works?

 

[Lastamender]

Obama openly admits he attacked terrorists.
If you think that is a crime, you are welcome to take it to a Grand Jury

All Trumps charges went to a Grand Jury and he was indicted on 91 Charges

When he was found not guilty by the Senate. You cannot turn the Constitution upside down to go after one man who was president.

 

[rightwinger]

When he was found not guilty by the Senate. You cannot turn the Constitution upside down to go after one man who was president.

Trump was not found not guilty
A majority of Senators including Republicans voted to convict.
Just not 2/3…that is not an acquittal

 

[Lastamender]

Trump was not found not guilty
A majority of Senators including Republicans voted to convict.
Just not 2/3…that is not an acquittal

It is also a not guilty verdict. You lose hack.

 

[Godboy]

Again, if Obama was guilty of a crime…take him to a Grand Jury and indict him

Obama is not above the law and neither is Trump

You will FOR sure see Trumps DOJ go after his predessessors.

 

[BlindBoo]

When has an American terrorist ever been droned? We didnt drone the Boston bombers. We didnt drone the Unibomber. Americans have rights.

An American who joined a terrorist organization that flew jetliners full of passengers in to symbols of Western Power? Jetliners and buildings filled with innocent people from all over the world! Give Obama a medal for that grease spot!

 

[Lastamender]

An American who joined a terrorist organization that flew jetliners full of passengers in to symbols of the Wests Power? Jetliners and buildings filled with innocent people from all over the world! Give Obama a medal for that grease spot!

Why not? He got the Nobel Prize for nothing.

 

[MagicMike]

Trump got 11,000,000 more votes in 2020 than in 2016
Biden got 81,000,000 votes in 2020

Biden got 30,000,000 more votes than typically vote in a presidential election due to mail-in election fraud. QED

Fake news!
Remember, just because Trump says it that doesn't necessarily mean you have to make a fool of yourself by repeating it without doing your own fact checking.
#1 there has never been any credible proof of any widespread election fraud in 2020.
#2 mail-in ballots are just as secure as the other methods of voting.

 

[Lastamender]

Fake news!
Remember, just because Trump says it that doesn't necessarily mean you have to make a fool of yourself by repeating it without doing your own fact checking.
#1 there has never been any credible proof of any widespread election fraud in 2020.
#2 mail-in ballots are just as secure as the other methods of voting.

There is all kinds of credible evidence that you assholes deny. If mail in ballots are secure why did 89% of democracies outlaw them.

1. Ballot Integrity Procedures and Laws are part of every modern democracy to ensure election integrity.
2. 89% of European democracies banned absentee voting to resident citizens, while 100% require Photo ID for any form of voting to prevent targeted fraud.
3. 37 states in the US altered their absentee/mail-in ballots Ballot Integrity Procedures for 2020 Presidential Election.

Evidence Stats on the 2020 Election | Here Is The Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

 

[rightwinger]

You will FOR sure see Trumps DOJ go after his predessessors.

I never questioned whether Trump would engage in petty retaliation with no evidence.
Republicans are doing it now with Biden

 

[forkup]

Facile faux analysis.

Striking an enemy is not akin to murdering an American political opponent.

Your fail is massive. And you’re a joke.

Neither is claiming a VP can unilaterally decide to ignore the certified election result. Ignore court rulings in favor of your own opinion. And asking your supporters to pressure Congress to not certify. (Note I'm purposefully going with the most benign explanation of what he asked them to do.) Akin to a simple expression of his duty to safeguard the election.

Yet that's what his lawyers claim he did, to tie it "within the outer boundaries of Presidential Power." There's a reason for that bolded bit. Meaning he claims his claims should be given the widest possible benefit of doubt when determining what's in the scope of the President's powers.

But hey I'm glad you consider the argument as a "Facile faux analysis." It's kind of the point I'm making.

Seems to me the "joke's" on you.

 

[MagicMike]

You will FOR sure see Trumps DOJ go after his predessessors.

He AIN'T gonna have no DOJ Skipp.
He's gonna have a stainless steel sink that's built into the top of his toilet and a big, black cellmate named Rosie.

 

[rightwinger]

Meaning he claims his claims should given the widest possible benefit of doubt when determining what's in the scope of the President's powers.

Trumps lawyers are claiming he was acting within the duties of Presidential Powers

Trump banging a Porn Star and paying for her silence with business funds is not a Presidential act

Taking Top Secret documents and refusing to return them when you are no longer President is not a Presidential act

Elections have been Constitutionally awarded to States to administer. It is not up to a President to interfere with them or substitute fake electors.

I don’t know…can a sitting President send a mob to attack the Capitol and claim it was his job?