Trump's Second Amendment Rhetoric Again Veers Into Threatening Territory

[Ray From Cleveland]

Wrong.

There is no such ‘plan’.

You’re as much a liar as Trump.

Liberals support Heller/McDonald, they consider current Second Amendment case law to be settled and accepted, and have no desire to allow states and local jurisdictions to enact comprehensive ‘gun bans,’ or ‘prohibit’ the sale of firearms.

Your post not only exhibits ignorance of the law and the propensity for lying common to most on the right, it also shows the hypocrisy of conservatives.

What happened to “states’ rights” and the right of local communities to decide their own issues absent interference from ‘big government.’

If it’s un-Constitutional for states to ban certain types of firearms – or firearms altogether – then it’s likewise un-Constitutional for states to seek to compel women to give birth against their will, or to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law.

Conservatives can’t have it both ways.

What happened to states rights? Went right out the window with gay marriage and Commie Care; both were forced upon states and there is nothing we can do about it.

If it's decided that there is no actual constitutional right to own or carry firearms, the states can do as they please because no matter what law they enact, it will not violate the US Constitution according to a leftist Supreme Court. There will no longer be any protection.

If you don't believe me, I'll post a list of things Democrats considered doing to gun owners in this country, but never carried through because they knew it would stop at the Supreme Court. Even our city wanted to sue gun manufacturers out of business, but could't because the cost would be enormous and they knew they would lose in the end.

 

[nat4900]

What happened to states rights?

Actually we had a very bloody CIVIL WAR to determine the limits of states' rights.

Go play with your guns......

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Never happened. If the Clinton campaign had been pushing the birther story it would have been all over the news in the spring of 2008. It wasn't. You're an idiot and a liar.

Origins of the claims

In March 2008, rumors that Obama was born in Kenya were spread on conservative websites.[26] During the Democratic Party's 2008 presidential primaries, anonymous e-mails from supporters of Hillary Clinton surfaced that questioned Obama's citizenship in an attempt to revive Clinton's faltering primary electioncampaign. These and numerous other chain e-mails during the subsequent presidential election circulated false rumors about Obama's origin, religion and birth certificate.[27][28]

Jim Geraghty of the conservative website National Review Online may have sparked further speculation on June 9, 2008, when he asked that Obama release his birth certificate.[29][30] Geraghty wrote that releasing his birth certificate could debunk several false rumors circulating on the Internet, namely: that his middle name was originally Muhammad rather than Hussein; that his mother had originally named him "Barry" rather than "Barack"; and that Barack Obama, Sr. was not his biological father, as well as the rumor that Barack Obama was not a natural-born citizen.[30][31][32]

In October 2009, anonymous e-mails circulated claiming that the Associated Press (AP) had reported Obama was "Kenyan-Born".[33] The claims were based on an AP story that had appeared five years earlier in a Kenyan publication, The Standard.[33][34] The rumor-checking website Snopes.com found that the headline and lead-in sentence describing Obama as born in Kenya and misspelling his first name had been added by the Kenyan newspaper, and did not appear in the story issued by the AP or in any other contemporary newspaper that picked up the AP story.[33][35]

Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[nat4900]

Never happened. If the Clinton campaign had been pushing the birther story it would have been all over the news in the spring of 2008. It wasn't. You're an idiot and a liar.

Origins of the claims

In March 2008, rumors that Obama was born in Kenya were spread on conservative websites.[26] During the Democratic Party's 2008 presidential primaries, anonymous e-mails from supporters of Hillary Clinton surfaced that questioned Obama's citizenship in an attempt to revive Clinton's faltering primary electioncampaign. These and numerous other chain e-mails during the subsequent presidential election circulated false rumors about Obama's origin, religion and birth certificate.[27][28]

Jim Geraghty of the conservative website National Review Online may have sparked further speculation on June 9, 2008, when he asked that Obama release his birth certificate.[29][30] Geraghty wrote that releasing his birth certificate could debunk several false rumors circulating on the Internet, namely: that his middle name was originally Muhammad rather than Hussein; that his mother had originally named him "Barry" rather than "Barack"; and that Barack Obama, Sr. was not his biological father, as well as the rumor that Barack Obama was not a natural-born citizen.[30][31][32]

In October 2009, anonymous e-mails circulated claiming that the Associated Press (AP) had reported Obama was "Kenyan-Born".[33] The claims were based on an AP story that had appeared five years earlier in a Kenyan publication, The Standard.[33][34] The rumor-checking website Snopes.com found that the headline and lead-in sentence describing Obama as born in Kenya and misspelling his first name had been added by the Kenyan newspaper, and did not appear in the story issued by the AP or in any other contemporary newspaper that picked up the AP story.[33][35]

Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you interpret THE ABOVE as irrefutable proof, then you're even dumber than first suspected.

 

[2aguy]

France has made military weapons completely illegal....and terrorists on government terrorist watch lists used them to murder 149 people in France....and military, fully automatic weapons are easy to get for both criminals and terrorists in France........so you are wrong...again..

No, actually I'm not wrong 'again" ...France unfortunately has about 5 borders with countries that don't have the same ban...... and virtually all the illegal guns that have been brought into France came from Belgium across a border where cars are seldom checked as for their passengers and baggage.

Yes....you are wrong.....France has all the gun control you want...and none of the other countries allows criminals or terrorists to buy, own or carry guns....and yet they are easy to get for criminals and terrorists......so you are wrong...gun control only works for law abiding citizens who willingly obey the laws.....France has everything, including a complete ban...and they can't control their guns either.

 

[2aguy]

Trump's correct again and displays both the glaring idiocy of the left and exposes the Dem base as useful idiots.

Hillary and her unarmed security detail should only appear in gunew free zones.

But some animals are more equal than others

Gun free zones don't prohibit armed security.

Why would you need armed security in a gun free Zone?

DUUUHH!!! You just don't get the idea of law enforcement do you?

You just don't get the idea of America, do You?

It's not that at all. You damned right wing folks have been hopelessly brainwashed by the NRA, whose interest is manufacturing endless numbers of guns, into thinking any small change in laws to prevent the criminals and mentally unstable from walking into any gun shop and buying a semi-automatic weapon, is an effort by good citizens to take away your guns. I can understand your concern. If you didn't have your AR-15 you'd have to get by with that little three inch pecker!

Germany, Britain and Australia....they show that you have no idea what you are talking about....

 

[2aguy]

To interpret Trump's statement as a threat is more than an asinine stretch - it is an outright lie. He was making the same statement that many have before and correctly pointing out that those politicians that advocate against gun ownership surround themselves with armed people to keep themselves safe. It is a clear case of true doublethink.

Same fucked up 'argument" made by nitwits.....

Clinton is NOT calling for the ban on ALL guns....that is something you got out of your rectum.......Her stance is military-style guns manufactured for the SOLE purpose of killing as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time..

get a brain and think for yourself....

Sorry...she just has to appoint one Justice to get the ball rolling....and those guns she wants banned....

8 million of them are now in private hands......they murdered 157 people in mass public shootings....in 34 years...

knives kill 1,500 people every single year...according to FBI homicide stats.....so there is no rational reason to ban these rifles....yet she still wants to....and asswipes like you think she only wants to stop with guns that rarely are used to murder people.....

you are the fool....

You don't think for yourself....you are dupe and an emotional one at that....reason does not seem to agree with you.

 

[2aguy]

And yet they don't........

8 million rifles with detachable magazines........and how many have been murdered with them....157...in 34 years.....1982-2016

knives murder 1,500 people every single year......

Excellent retort....Place that editorial on the next issue of ISIS Times....

You mean the truth, facts and reality.......

 

[Campbell]

Gun free zones don't prohibit armed security.

Why would you need armed security in a gun free Zone?

DUUUHH!!! You just don't get the idea of law enforcement do you?

You just don't get the idea of America, do You?

It's not that at all. You damned right wing folks have been hopelessly brainwashed by the NRA, whose interest is manufacturing endless numbers of guns, into thinking any small change in laws to prevent the criminals and mentally unstable from walking into any gun shop and buying a semi-automatic weapon, is an effort by good citizens to take away your guns. I can understand your concern. If you didn't have your AR-15 you'd have to get by with that little three inch pecker!

Germany, Britain and Australia....they show that you have no idea what you are talking about....

So you're OK with anyone being able to sell/buy a rocket launcher in the parking lot by a gun show? That's the kind of shit that going down these days. These crazy sons of bitches who walk into a theatre or a school and mow down dozens should not be able to buy any kind of weapon! You've got a warped sense of what should and should not be!

 

[Onyx]

So you're OK with anyone being able to sell/buy a rocket launcher in the parking lot by a gun show?

I am, and it is clear that you do not understand anything about weapons, because you just used the term "rocket launcher." Anyone of these terms would of been politically correct...

- Recoiless Rifle
- Rocket Propelled grenade
- AT launcher
- Man portable anti tank system

What if I told you that these weapons were not designed for killing other humans, and would be totally ineffective to use against anything other than a military vehicle or entrenchment?

 

[Onyx]

knives kill 1,500 people every single year...according to FBI homicide stats.....so there is no rational reason to ban these rifles....yet she still wants to....and asswipes like you think she only wants to stop with guns that rarely are used to murder people.....

They are regulating those too.

Switchblades are illegal where I live. Not sure about other places.

 

[HenryBHough]

The left's psychotic rants have reached fever pitch. Gone downright clinical - in urgent need of medical intervention.

I'd recommend a physician who helped with a similar problem in France a few years back but nobody seems to be able to find Dr. Guillotine. Maybe they haven't check the voter rolls in Chicago?

 

[Iceweasel]

The man is insane. Encouraging the assination of his competitor ( Hillary ) is just a stutter step short of Stalins tactics.


Trump's Second Amendment Rhetoric Again Veers Into Threatening Territory



Donald Trump hit Hillary Clinton on Second Amendment rights during a Miami rally Friday night, but made a controversial statement while doing so — suggesting her Secret Service detail should stop carrying guns and "see what happens to her."

"Now, you know she's very much against the Second Amendment, she wants to destroy your Second Amendment — guns, guns, guns, right? I think what we should do is, she goes around with armed bodyguards like you have never seen before," the GOP nominee said, deviating from his prepared remarks on the teleprompter. "I think that her bodyguards should drop all weapons, they should disarm, right? I think they should disarm. Immediately, what do you think? Yeah, take their guns away. She doesn't want guns. Take their – let's see what happens to her. Take their guns away, OK? It'll be very dangerous."

How does that support your claim against Trump? He made a good point, one made many times when celebs or politicians shoot off their mouths against gun ownership.

 

[Lilah]

The man is insane. Encouraging the assination of his competitor ( Hillary ) is just a stutter step short of Stalins tactics.


Trump's Second Amendment Rhetoric Again Veers Into Threatening Territory



Donald Trump hit Hillary Clinton on Second Amendment rights during a Miami rally Friday night, but made a controversial statement while doing so — suggesting her Secret Service detail should stop carrying guns and "see what happens to her."

"Now, you know she's very much against the Second Amendment, she wants to destroy your Second Amendment — guns, guns, guns, right? I think what we should do is, she goes around with armed bodyguards like you have never seen before," the GOP nominee said, deviating from his prepared remarks on the teleprompter. "I think that her bodyguards should drop all weapons, they should disarm, right? I think they should disarm. Immediately, what do you think? Yeah, take their guns away. She doesn't want guns. Take their – let's see what happens to her. Take their guns away, OK? It'll be very dangerous."

Actually he made a solid point that some on the progressive left believe removing firearms from the general society will make this country safer but what if you took the firearms away from Hillary Clinton Secret Service Detail?

She would be less safe and no Donald Trump was not making any threat against her but pointing out the reality that her Security Detail are carrying guns and make her life safer.

What trump said was clearly a threat to Clintons life. And he knows it. That's why he said it.

Does someone want to shoot her?

 

[Onyx]

A lot of people want to shoot Hillary Clinton.

And that queer faggot Trump.

 

[Contumacious]

The man is insane. Encouraging the assination of his competitor ( Hillary ) is just a stutter step short of Stalins tactics.


Trump's Second Amendment Rhetoric Again Veers Into Threatening Territory



Donald Trump hit Hillary Clinton on Second Amendment rights during a Miami rally Friday night, but made a controversial statement while doing so — suggesting her Secret Service detail should stop carrying guns and "see what happens to her."

"Now, you know she's very much against the Second Amendment, she wants to destroy your Second Amendment — guns, guns, guns, right? I think what we should do is, she goes around with armed bodyguards like you have never seen before," the GOP nominee said, deviating from his prepared remarks on the teleprompter. "I think that her bodyguards should drop all weapons, they should disarm, right? I think they should disarm. Immediately, what do you think? Yeah, take their guns away. She doesn't want guns. Take their – let's see what happens to her. Take their guns away, OK? It'll be very dangerous."

BULLSHIT YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER


MR TRUMP'S POINT IS CLEAR

IF FIREARMS ARE UNNECESSARY TO DEFEND OUR LIVES THEN KILLARY SHOULD NOT HAVE ARMED GUARDS TO DEFEND HER LIFE

YOU AND PRAVDA PURPOSELY MISREPRESENT HER POINT

AMERICANS FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR SCAM AND WILL VOTE FOR TRUMP


.

 

[conserveguy877]

Trump with the bold statement on Crooked Hillary! Makes it even better seeing rigged cnn spinning.

 

[Lilah]

A lot of people want to shoot Hillary Clinton.

And that queer faggot Trump.

She has bodyguards to protect her, the innocent people in Chicago do not.

 

[SYTFE]

Attn conservative IMBECILES: Hillary does NOT want to "destroy the 2nd Ammendment."

It is a full time job having to educate the conservatives on this forum. Collectively, the right wing members who populate this place might just be the dumbest fucking conservatives on the planet. Idiots.

 

[hazlnut]

I bet hitlery won't disarm her armed with guns protection.....

You taking that bet? 1000 dollars to St. Jude's charity....

Do you read your posts before hitting reply?