Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- Thread starter
- #1,221
Why?
to cover up voter fraud?
to cover up voter fraud?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Bradley effect theorizes that the inaccurate polls were skewed by the phenomenon of social desirability bias.[7][8] Specifically, some white voters give inaccurate polling responses for fear that, by stating their true preference, they will open themselves to criticism of racial motivation. Members of the public may feel under pressure to provide an answer that is deemed to be more publicly acceptable, or 'politically correct'. The reluctance to give accurate polling answers has sometimes extended to post-election exit polls as well. The race of the pollster conducting the interview may factor in to voters' answers.
The son of a taxi driver, Royko wrote from a common man's perspective, specializing in City Hall corruption, a wistful love of the Chicago Cubs and a gritty lifting up of the multicultural neighborhoods from which he came.
One election year before the Illinois primary, Royko, angry with television stations calling winners before people finished voting, suggested readers do one simple thing when asked questions by pollsters: lie.
Screw up the whole television prediction game. For example, if on Saturday a pollster asks who you plan to support as you head into a Democratic caucus site, you say Obama if you like Clinton and Clinton if you like Obama.
Tired of election-day exit polls that "project" winners, Chicago columnist Mike Royko urged his readers to lie to anyone asking how they had voted in the Illinois presidential primary. It would, he wrote, be "a good lie, a worthwhile lie, a lie that will put bounce in your step and a giggle in your voice and make you feel wonderful."
Why?
to cover up voter fraud?
Did you ever think that people lie in an exit poll?
I have.
Why is it our country cant get exit polling right?
Is everyone else just better at exit polling than us?
Or is it that we are becoming the laughing stock of the world due to the massive cheating in elections that the republican party has done since 1988?
What fraud?
I am so sick of the way you people rationalize lying
Exit polls are the major way to detect fraud
By lying you are distroying our ability to detect election fraud.
If you wanted to catch election fraud you dont lie to pollsters
If it were republicans lying in the polls then the result would be the opposite of what you see here
Try to follow.
100 voters, 49 Dems and 51 Republicans, vote in a precinct.
All 100 stop and talk to the idiot liberal conducting the exit poll.
49 Dems say, I vote for the Dem, Bushchimpy McHitler!
41 Republicans say they voted for the Republican.
10 Republicans lie and say they also voted for the Dem, Bushchimpy McHitler!
Exit poll results, Dem 59 votes, Republican 41 votes.
Actual result, Republican 51 votes, Dem 49 votes.
OMG! The fraud is terrible in this district. Get the Justice Department to investigate.
I blame Cheney!!!
tod you dont have a shred of integrity do you?
Exit polls are the standard barrer for keeping elections clean.
Some one has told you it would be a great idea to lie in them, why?
To hide the fraud
It seems that TNM has never heard of the Bradley Effect.
The Bradley effect theorizes that the inaccurate polls were skewed by the phenomenon of social desirability bias.[7][8] Specifically, some white voters give inaccurate polling responses for fear that, by stating their true preference, they will open themselves to criticism of racial motivation. Members of the public may feel under pressure to provide an answer that is deemed to be more publicly acceptable, or 'politically correct'. The reluctance to give accurate polling answers has sometimes extended to post-election exit polls as well. The race of the pollster conducting the interview may factor in to voters' answers.
Bradley effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Or the Royko Effect.
The son of a taxi driver, Royko wrote from a common man's perspective, specializing in City Hall corruption, a wistful love of the Chicago Cubs and a gritty lifting up of the multicultural neighborhoods from which he came.
One election year before the Illinois primary, Royko, angry with television stations calling winners before people finished voting, suggested readers do one simple thing when asked questions by pollsters: lie.
Screw up the whole television prediction game. For example, if on Saturday a pollster asks who you plan to support as you head into a Democratic caucus site, you say Obama if you like Clinton and Clinton if you like Obama.
Networks botch exit polls again - Opinion - ReviewJournal.com
Tired of election-day exit polls that "project" winners, Chicago columnist Mike Royko urged his readers to lie to anyone asking how they had voted in the Illinois presidential primary. It would, he wrote, be "a good lie, a worthwhile lie, a lie that will put bounce in your step and a giggle in your voice and make you feel wonderful."
Picks and Pans Review: How Many People Think This Was a Good Idea? : People.com
Exit polls are the major way to detect fraud
By lying you are distroying our ability to detect election fraud.
If you wanted to catch election fraud you dont lie to pollsters