- Aug 12, 2009
- 37,810
- 7,317
Actually, you're wrong.
The assertion is sourced. If you maintain the source is in error, then to be taken seriously, the onus is on you to prove the error.
In other words, the ball is in your court. If you are unable or unwilling to expose the so called lie, then (if this were a real debate)....you lose.
It's not a real debate, obviously. It's just usmb. Where people who think they're really smart (but have never actually proven they are) come to pretend like they've participated in an intellectual discussion..when really, they haven't, and in fact don't even know the first thing about how an intellectual discussion is conducted.
So as long as you know who said something, you believe it?
Nope.
But if your assertion is that the tsa person is lying, you can either prove it, or just look stupid.
I don't believe that I have "asserted" that.