Tsarnaev family collected over $100,000 in welfare benfits!!!

[Yurt]

obama had nothing to do with them getting welfare

dumb thread

 

[bodecea]

Both sides should simply forget Obama for a minute and look at the article.
Comment on the fact that The Tsarnaev family, including the suspected terrorists and their parents, benefited from more than $100,000 in taxpayer-funded assistance — a bonanza ranging from cash and food stamps to Section 8 housing from 2002 to 2012, instead of blaming Obama.

We support this immigrant trash family for 10 years and they repay us by murdering and maiming us. Id stop all welfare, govt aid to any and every one who isnt a US citizen. Screw 'em to hell.

In America the crimes of the son are also the crimes of the parents.

Apparently. And the crimes of the cousins and the grandparents and the aunts and uncles.

 

[antiquity]

From 2001 to 2006 Bush and the repubs had plenty of time to put and end to that kind of nonsense.

There was nothing to take care of, since Welfare Reform Act took care of the problem back during Clinton Administration.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

$2,500 per year per person. (That's barely two months of a mortgage payment for me.)


A cash bonanza?


There are bigger issues to worry about like the fact that the assholes (the children) blew up people.


>>>>

The ammount is irrelevant. The fact that they got ANY is the issue imo

So no one should get government assistance because they might potentially in the future, possibility or maybe commit a crime?

How do we go about predicting the future actions of someone a decade from now?



>>>>

How did you draw that conclusion from my post?

I dont think immigrants of any kind should be eligible for taxpayer dollars in any fashion. Period

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

From 2001 to 2006 Bush and the repubs had plenty of time to put and end to that kind of nonsense.

Wasn't it the Clinton Administration who put a five limit on welfare, yes I believe it was. So since the five years limit wasn't up until after the Democrats took control of congress and Obama Administration has rescinded the five year limit, I guess its all on Obama head now.

Because a rule passed under Clinton failed to stop it, that means Bush & Romney were under no obligation to do anything at all? That makes no fucking sense

 

[antiquity]

obamie had from 2009 to 2013 same amount of time. he ain't done shit.

Actually he did...Obama rescinded the Clinton Reform Act which put a five year ban on collecting Welfare.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

obama had nothing to do with them getting welfare

dumb thread

It's a ShootSpeeders thread, what did you expect?

 

[antiquity]

This country should have stopped all immigration from muslim countrys after 9/11............

These atrocities have been welcomed by our clueless political civil servants

Then they'll just immigrate from non-muslim countries. Duh.

Maybe we should disallow the immigration of white children with autism while we're at it.

We should if they are illegals.

 

[antiquity]

$2,500 per year per person. (That's barely two months of a mortgage payment for me.
A cash bonanza?

There are bigger issues to worry about like the fact that the assholes (the children) blew up people.

But if they were only collecting $2500 a month in welfare benefits how did they manage to have car, afford a six month trip to Russia and gather all the bombs and guns? Who paid for the parents to travel to Russia? Something doesn't add up.

Sounds to me they had help from some outside financier.

 

[antiquity]

Then they'll just immigrate from non-muslim countries. Duh.

Maybe we should disallow the immigration of white children with autism while we're at it.

Their skin color is of no importance, coming from a backwards muslim country is..........

And what broadbrush action would you have recommended after the Oklahoma City bombing?

Oklahoma City bombing wasn't a terrorist act as much as a revenge bombing against the federal government for the attack on Waco.

 

[antiquity]

how many attacks have been prevented under the Obama watch?

I can think of one he never prevented, the attack by a Muslim extremist at Fort Hood and I do believe there were plenty of warning about the man that wasn't taken seriously by the Obama Administration.

 

[bodecea]

Their skin color is of no importance, coming from a backwards muslim country is..........

And what broadbrush action would you have recommended after the Oklahoma City bombing?

Oklahoma City bombing wasn't a terrorist act as much as a revenge bombing against the federal government for the attack on Waco.

Aren't all terrorist acts acts of revenge for something?

 

[bodecea]

how many attacks have been prevented under the Obama watch?

I can think of one he never prevented, the attack by a Muslim extremist at Fort Hood and I do believe there were plenty of warning about the man that wasn't taken seriously by the Obama Administration.

At least by the Army.

 

[antiquity]

Wasn't it the Clinton Administration who put a five limit on welfare, yes I believe it was. So since the five years limit wasn't up until after the Democrats took control of congress and Obama Administration has rescinded the five year limit, I guess its all on Obama head now.

Because a rule passed under Clinton failed to stop it, that means Bush & Romney were under no obligation to do anything at all? That makes no fucking sense

What was there to stop, the Welfare Reform Act was in place during the entire Bush Administration. It wasn't until Obama rescinded the Reform Act that a problem has arisen.

 

[jknowgood]

And what broadbrush action would you have recommended after the Oklahoma City bombing?

Oklahoma City bombing wasn't a terrorist act as much as a revenge bombing against the federal government for the attack on Waco.

Aren't all terrorist acts acts of revenge for something?

Yeah like the fort hood bomber? In which obama called work place violence.

 

[antiquity]

And what broadbrush action would you have recommended after the Oklahoma City bombing?

Oklahoma City bombing wasn't a terrorist act as much as a revenge bombing against the federal government for the attack on Waco.

Aren't all terrorist acts acts of revenge for something?

Maybe, but not all revenge acts are terrorist acts.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

And what broadbrush action would you have recommended after the Oklahoma City bombing?

Oklahoma City bombing wasn't a terrorist act as much as a revenge bombing against the federal government for the attack on Waco.

Aren't all terrorist acts acts of revenge for something?

I can't see any difference between the two either.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

he and the vast majority of Amercicans like helping their fellow man.

your sociopathic party is the one who wants children to go hungry

HAHAHA. Silly liberals try to drag "the children" into every issue they are losing.

PS - you forgot to call me a racist.

 

[WorldWatcher]

$2,500 per year per person. (That's barely two months of a mortgage payment for me.
A cash bonanza?

There are bigger issues to worry about like the fact that the assholes (the children) blew up people.

But if they were only collecting $2500 a month in welfare benefits how did they manage to have car, afford a six month trip to Russia and gather all the bombs and guns? Who paid for the parents to travel to Russia? Something doesn't add up.

Sounds to me they had help from some outside financier.

The OP claims $100,000 for the period 2002-2012 for the two children and the parents. That's four people.


That's 100,000 divided by 10, which is 10,000.

Then take 10,000 divided by 4, which is $2,500.

That is $2,500 per person per year, not per month.



So ya, you can pretty much bet there was another source of income (whether legal or illegal I don't know.)


>>>>

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

Oklahoma City bombing wasn't a terrorist act as much as a revenge bombing against the federal government for the attack on Waco.

If that was true, OKC would have been justified. But more likely it was yet another false flag attack by our own govt and mcveigh was the patsy. Who benefited from OKC? The govt.