Tucker Carlson calls for a ban on all electronic voting machines and mail-in ballots in the United Sates

[Harpy Eagle]

I'm sure you'd try too!

Don't worry, I am not going to steal your boyfriend.

 

[White 6]

I agree with Tucker. We need to use just paper like they do in France and Italy. They have their results on election day. COVID is no longer and there's no sense in using Mail-In Ballots. If not illegal ballot harvesting will take place just like last time.

Tuck is just a partisan little bitch.

 

[Care4all]

We can tighten up voting security, where it does not disenfranchise.

All electronic voting machines spits out a paper ballot, that voter drops in a drop box....? This way there is a paper copy of the citizen's vote, for recounts and not just the machine tally...

Absentee/mail in voting envelopes should have tracking numbers, for both sending envelope to the voter and voter envelope to the election polls. Ballots must be requested by voter, with few exceptions for the handful of states that have mail in voting only.

There are ways to do this, that are available out there that we can figure this out without hurting democracy and our own citizens right to vote for our own representation!

 

[Blaster]

Eliminate mail-in voting and use paper ballots. Exceptions should be made for the disabled.

 

[The Duke]

That's a lie, every independent recount proved Gore the whore lost.

.

Wow! So my memory isn't shot yet!

Recount shows Gore had won

Fresh evidence has emerged in Florida that Al Gore might have won last year's presidential election under a less contentious voting system, and if the US supreme court had not stepped in to stop the recount.

www.theguardian.com

^That's just about what I remember.

Here's the thing, though: Democrats created an environment in 2020 to where several states were set up to be like Florida was in 2000.

 

[Care4all]

Eliminate mail-in voting and use paper ballots. Exceptions should be made for the disabled.

Geez, y'all should have thought about that before you tortured and terrorized our volunteer election workers with your lies, to the point of them quitting, and ruining their lives....and few willing to volunteer anymore!

To hand count the entire Nation's vote, will take a lot of trained volunteers, larger buildings, and at least a week to hand count.....let alone time to verify. I'm ok with that, but no crying from you on election night for the votes not being counted, and not knowing a projected winner for at least a few days.

 

[The Duke]

Geez, y'all should have thought about that before you tortured and terrorized our volunteer election workers with your lies, to the point of them quitting, and ruining their lives....and few willing to volunteer anymore!

To hand count the entire Nation's vote, will take a lot of trained volunteers, larger buildings, and at least a week to hand count.....let alone time to verify. I'm ok with that, but no crying from you on election night for the votes not being counted, and not knowing a projected winner for at least a few days.

You don't find it odd how they could do it for decades and centuries even before 2020, then all of a sudden they can't?

Well, I kinda do.

 

[Care4all]

You don't find it odd how they could do it for decades and centuries even before 2020, then all of a sudden they can't?

Well, I kinda do.

No.

Do you think our population and number of voters has stayed the same over the century or that our candidates and representative positions have not increased over the years making ballots longer etc?

 

[airplanemechanic]

With in-person ID voting sure you can do a re-count since the challenge would be against the count total . The same doesn't work when you add in millions of mail-in ballots when the challenge includes not only the count but the validity of the ballot itself.

That's what people don't understand. Liberals say shit like "they did a recount and got the same number." I'm sure the fuck they did. You can recount fraudulent ballots as many times as you want to, doesn't make the ballots LEGIT. It's like recounting counterfeit money, you will get the same number over and over but it doesn't make the money real. With mail in ballots with no verification of authenticity, the 2020 election was one of the most fraudulent elections in US history.

 

[Blaster]

Geez, y'all should have thought about that before you tortured and terrorized our volunteer election workers with your lies, to the point of them quitting, and ruining their lives....and few willing to volunteer anymore!

To hand count the entire Nation's vote, will take a lot of trained volunteers, larger buildings, and at least a week to hand count.....let alone time to verify. I'm ok with that, but no crying from you on election night for the votes not being counted, and not knowing a projected winner for at least a few days.

There is no reason that voting results can't be the same day but democrats like you need more time to cheat.

 

[Care4all]

There is no reason that voting results can't be the same day but democrats like you need more time to cheat.

Sigh....

 

[Blaster]

Sigh....

A typical response from you.

 

[The Duke]

Sigh....

It was for decades of elections, gf. Even the punch card and fill the box hand counted ones.

Then all of a sudden they can't in 2020?

Yeah, bullshit. They had to count all of the legit votes then come up with enough fraudulent ones to beat that number is what it is.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Sigh....

Why the fuck did we know Clinton won the election THAT NIGHT back in 1992 but we can't find out who won the god damned election in 2020 with electronic voting machines that have more power in each one than Apollo 11 did that we sent to the fucking moon?

 

[DGS49]

This thinking typifies the difference between the Democrat view of "democracy" and the Republican view. Republicans want COMPETENT voters, for whom getting to the polls on Election Day while the polls are open with a picture ID, or obtaining and completing a legitimate Absentee Ballot are not "obstacles" to voting.

Democrats demand the inclusion of INCOMPETENT voters, who require that they be given assistance and unprecedented accommodations in order to vote. Because without the votes of these incompetents, Democrats would never win another national election...and they know it.

 

[Care4all]

Why the fuck did we know Clinton won the election THAT NIGHT back in 1992 but we can't find out who won the god damned election in 2020 with electronic voting machines that have more power in each one than Apollo 11 did that we sent to the fucking moon?

It was PREDICTED Clinton was the winner due to the way the vote counts were showing, with percentages, and estimated extrapolation. This was not a close race, Clinton won by a landslide in '92 and the winner could easily be predicted by the media pollster specialists.

NOTE! No vote count from any state is anything but an estimate until 3 weeks later, when the vote is certified.

 

[Care4all]

With in-person ID voting sure you can do a re-count since the challenge would be against the count total . The same doesn't work when you add in millions of mail-in ballots when the challenge includes not only the count but the validity of the ballot itself.

But there are security measures with checks and balances for absentee ballots as well.

First, you have to be a legal registered voter, and you have to locally request a ballot from your town office.

Some states require a signature on the request, that is checked by the office, or if the request is done on the internet, the form asks specific questions about yourself that only you, would usually know, and asks where you want your ballot mailed. This data is entered in to their system after the office worker checks your status, and envelopes with your name and address and the proper ballot for your voting precinct is printed, along with another envelope printed to mail your filled out ballot back. (if there were one address not associated with the voter where many of the ballots were mailed, the system would catch it)

Some states have tracking numbers on these envelopes, so that voters can check the status of their ballot and see that the polling place got it.

When the voting g precinct gets the registered voter's ballot back, they make note of it being returned, make certain it was originally requested individually and the office sent them one and in most cases verify the signature from their files or notifies the voter if the Sig did not match....

If the counting is done at a central counting location these precincts initial the envelope indicating they checked on the ballot being requested, and if they did the checking of signature, then they initial the envelope for that as well.... If not, the central location does the sig verifying.

This count kept by every precinct of the ballots requested and mailed, are compared to the total absentee ballots returned back. This eliminates ...and is a check... on ballot stuffing fraud. You can't have more ballots returned than ballots individually request by registered voters.

Also, there is another safety measure with the weight of the ballot paper, where the counting machines will reject the ballot not at the proper programmed weight....

There is more involved than just those things too kitty.

---------

as far as the absentee ballot, the hand paper ballot recount is compared to the machine count as well.... Since absentee ballots are scanned in to vote counting machines which gives us the first count.

 

[Blaster]

But there are security measures with checks and balances for absentee ballots as well.

First, you have to be a legal registered voter, and you have to locally request a ballot from your town office.

Some states require a signature on the request, that is checked by the office, or if the request is done on the internet, the form asks specific questions about yourself that only you, would usually know, and asks where you want your ballot mailed. This data is entered in to their system after the office worker checks your status, and envelopes with your name and address and the proper ballot for your voting precinct is printed, along with another envelope printed to mail your filled out ballot back. (if there were one address not associated with the voter where many of the ballots were mailed, the system would catch it)

Some states have tracking numbers on these envelopes, so that voters can check the status of their ballot and see that the polling place got it.

When the voting g precinct gets the registered voter's ballot back, they make note of it being returned, make certain it was originally requested individually and the office sent them one and in most cases verify the signature from their files or notifies the voter if the Sig did not match....

If the counting is done at a central counting location these precincts initial the envelope indicating they checked on the ballot being requested, and if they did the checking of signature, then they initial the envelope for that as well.... If not, the central location does the sig verifying.

This count kept by every precinct of the ballots requested and mailed, are compared to the total absentee ballots returned back. This eliminates ...and is a check... on ballot stuffing fraud. You can't have more ballots returned than ballots individually request by registered voters.

Also, there is another safety measure with the weight of the ballot paper, where the counting machines will reject the ballot not at the proper programmed weight....

There is more involved than just those things too kitty.

---------

as far as the absentee ballot, the hand paper ballot recount is compared to the machine count as well.... Since absentee ballots are scanned in to vote counting machines which gives us the first count.

You need to shorten your posts as nobody has the patience to read the entire thing.

 

[Hellokitty]

But there are security measures with checks and balances for absentee ballots as well.

First, you have to be a legal registered voter, and you have to locally request a ballot from your town office.

Some states require a signature on the request, that is checked by the office, or if the request is done on the internet, the form asks specific questions about yourself that only you, would usually know, and asks where you want your ballot mailed. This data is entered in to their system after the office worker checks your status, and envelopes with your name and address and the proper ballot for your voting precinct is printed, along with another envelope printed to mail your filled out ballot back. (if there were one address not associated with the voter where many of the ballots were mailed, the system would catch it)

Some states have tracking numbers on these envelopes, so that voters can check the status of their ballot and see that the polling place got it.

When the voting g precinct gets the registered voter's ballot back, they make note of it being returned, make certain it was originally requested individually and the office sent them one and in most cases verify the signature from their files or notifies the voter if the Sig did not match....

If the counting is done at a central counting location these precincts initial the envelope indicating they checked on the ballot being requested, and if they did the checking of signature, then they initial the envelope for that as well.... If not, the central location does the sig verifying.

This count kept by every precinct of the ballots requested and mailed, are compared to the total absentee ballots returned back. This eliminates ...and is a check... on ballot stuffing fraud. You can't have more ballots returned than ballots individually request by registered voters.

Also, there is another safety measure with the weight of the ballot paper, where the counting machines will reject the ballot not at the proper programmed weight....

There is more involved than just those things too kitty.

---------

as far as the absentee ballot, the hand paper ballot recount is compared to the machine count as well.... Since absentee ballots are scanned in to vote counting machines which gives us the first count.

Thanks for explaining a few of the many steps involved in mail-in voting which makes it easier for fraud and less secure. If the chain of custody can't be verified in just 1 of the numerous steps the ballot is no longer secured.

 

[excalibur]

The 2020 election was the most secure election in years.

LOL No.