Tucker Carlson slams Sidney Powell

[the other mike]

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

If Powell can’t convince a Fox News host, how is she going to convince a court?

It's not her obligation to provide evidence for Tucker Carlson or you.

Or, apparently..to anyone else!

 

[the other mike]

Let's let Facebook fact-check for us.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Is Tucker a fucking asshole? The evidence is HEADED TO COURT!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Misleading title.

"What Powell was describing would amount to the single greatest crime in American history,” Carlson said.

Carlson emphasized that he “did not dismiss any” of Powell’s claims, and said he “took Sidney Powell seriously with no intention of fighting with her.” But he said he was disturbed that she didn’t produce any evidence for his show.

Oh, so Tucker wanted an exclusive and Powell (Dallas Lawyer) said "no" FOX is a fox in the hen house (pun intended).

Raise your hand if you personally know Powell's local inner circle and have spoken with them about her concerns with media types getting the info before she can present evidence in a hearing?

....



...


...






Remember, former Fed Prosecutor.....

Tucker is just pissed that he too must wait.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Is Tucker a fucking asshole? The evidence is HEADED TO COURT!

like I said, he's mad they won't give him the exclusive. He's mad they won't give up their evidence to him so he can get his ratings back up after his net work totally fucked all his views right up the ass.

His anger is pulling in in one direction. It should be pointed right at his employer.

 

[Slade3200]

She can’t provide any evidence or show that a single vote was switched.

Tucker Carlson bashes Trump attorney Sidney Powell for lack of evidence in fraud claims: ‘She never sent us any’

We invited Sidney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour,” Carlson said. “But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of requests, polite requests. Not a page. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her.”

Carlson also noted: “She never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one.”


If Trumps A Team can’t even convince Fox News of their wild theories.....

How can they convince a court?

I know libs expect conformity from their media

and they get it

but conservatives look at the facts and decide for themselves

I agree with tucker carlson most of the time but not on this

What exactly do you disagree with?

 

[Lesh]

Jesus.

A week ago Tucker was YOUR GUY

 

[Slade3200]

She's under no obligation to give them any evidence if she has it. Any good attorney wouldnt give a liberal media squat. Just keep them flailing and chasing shiny things on the periphery.

You think Tucker Carlson is liberal media?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Any good attorney wouldnt give a liberal media squat.

A good attorney would be making an argument in court rather than during press conferences.

If she has the evidence, she'll take it to the courts.

 

[Slade3200]

Not a good look for Carlson. Powell is fighting for the life of America and he is pouting because she
snubbed his program.

He is pouting because he has been promoting her narrative and is now realizing she has no evidence to back it up and it’s all about to blow up in their faces

 

[colfax_m]

If she has the evidence, she'll take it to the courts.

Maybe she should do that instead of having press conferences and talking to uncritical idiots on OAN or Newsmax?

 

[22lcidw]

She can’t provide any evidence or show that a single vote was switched.

Tucker Carlson bashes Trump attorney Sidney Powell for lack of evidence in fraud claims: ‘She never sent us any’

We invited Sidney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour,” Carlson said. “But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of requests, polite requests. Not a page. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her.”

Carlson also noted: “She never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one.”


If Trumps A Team can’t even convince Fox News of their wild theories.....

How can they convince a court?

If you wonder why people stick with Trump it is because damn near everything is anti Trump with a healthy helping of Republican admonishment with it. So I am on Microsoft Edge using the informational option. like most of our social media, near everything on is skewered Progressive Socialist. Now there are people who read this and believe it. People whose knowledge is limited or receptive to soft propaganda and worse. Neutrality does not exist. Trump needs every person he can get to be on his side because there has been so few of them. You name names of Repub sided scribes. We can get a encyclopedia full of people who have a say and an affect on the general population. And damn near all of them live good to great lives but will deny others the same.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

She's under no obligation to give them any evidence if she has it. Any good attorney wouldnt give a liberal media squat. Just keep them flailing and chasing shiny things on the periphery.

You think Tucker Carlson is liberal media?

Yep. I've never watched Fox. They're just as bad or worse than the other liberal mainstream news cnn, msnbc, abc, cbs, nbc.

 

[Slade3200]

Misleading title.

"What Powell was describing would amount to the single greatest crime in American history,” Carlson said.

Carlson emphasized that he “did not dismiss any” of Powell’s claims, and said he “took Sidney Powell seriously with no intention of fighting with her.” But he said he was disturbed that she didn’t produce any evidence for his show.

Oh, so Tucker wanted an exclusive and Powell (Dallas Lawyer) said "no" FOX is a fox in the hen house (pun intended).

Raise your hand if you personally know Powell's local inner circle and have spoken with them about her concerns with media types getting the info before she can present evidence in a hearing?

....



...


...






Remember, former Fed Prosecutor.....

Tucker is just pissed that he too must wait.

Why hasn’t she presented it yet. What’s taking so long?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

If she has the evidence, she'll take it to the courts.

Maybe she should do that instead of having press conferences and talking to uncritical idiots on OAN or Newsmax?

Those two are better than all of the liberal propaganda and fox, combined.

 

[rightwinger]

She can’t provide any evidence or show that a single vote was switched.

Tucker Carlson bashes Trump attorney Sidney Powell for lack of evidence in fraud claims: ‘She never sent us any’

We invited Sidney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour,” Carlson said. “But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of requests, polite requests. Not a page. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her.”

Carlson also noted: “She never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one.”


If Trumps A Team can’t even convince Fox News of their wild theories.....

How can they convince a court?

I know libs expect conformity from their media

and they get it

but conservatives look at the facts and decide for themselves

I agree with tucker carlson most of the time but not on this

Just demonstrates the gullibility of Conservatives and willingness to embrace any misinformation they are fed

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

"What Powell was describing would amount to the single greatest crime in American history,” Carlson said.

Carlson emphasized that he “did not dismiss any” of Powell’s claims, and said he “took Sidney Powell seriously with no intention of fighting with her.” But he said he was disturbed that she didn’t produce any evidence for his show.

If Powell can’t convince a Fox News host, how is she going to convince a court?

This is a conservative battle. They will use the law and the court system. Unlike the leftis dems who run to the media to spread their lies and ignore the law and constitution.

 

[Mac-7]

What exactly do you disagree with?

I disagree that Powell cannot provide evidence just because she declined to give tucker carlson an exclusive

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Misleading title.

"What Powell was describing would amount to the single greatest crime in American history,” Carlson said.

Carlson emphasized that he “did not dismiss any” of Powell’s claims, and said he “took Sidney Powell seriously with no intention of fighting with her.” But he said he was disturbed that she didn’t produce any evidence for his show.

Oh, so Tucker wanted an exclusive and Powell (Dallas Lawyer) said "no" FOX is a fox in the hen house (pun intended).

Raise your hand if you personally know Powell's local inner circle and have spoken with them about her concerns with media types getting the info before she can present evidence in a hearing?

....



...


...






Remember, former Fed Prosecutor.....

Tucker is just pissed that he too must wait.

Why hasn’t she presented it yet. What’s taking so long?

Remember , we were told it may take a year ot two with the fake russian ghost hunts. Remember?