Twitter bans ads that contradict science on climate change

[DigitalDrifter]

Science according to who? This is exactly why someone like Elon Musk needs to take over. The free expression of thoughts needs to be throughout our society, including Twitter.

ASSOCIATED PRESS
Twitter says it will no longer allow advertisers on its site who deny the scientific consensus on climate change, echoing a policy already in place at Google

“Ads shouldn’t detract from important conversations about the climate crisis,” the company said in a statement outlining its new policy Friday.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[Polishprince]

Modern "science" is more dogmatic that religion is nowadays.

 

[daveman]

Any science that does not welcome debate is not science. It's ideology.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Hopefully Musk will take over, and then what WILL be allowed, is the free expression of thought. Something the left side of the aisle has curiously gotten away from over the last twenty years!
I'm old enough to remember that the American left once valued freedom of speech above anything else! Sadly, that is not true today!

 

[toobfreak]

Science according to who? This is exactly why someone like Elon Musk needs to take over. The free expression of thoughts needs to be throughout our society, including Twitter.

What doers Twitter know about science?
And how do you have a discussion about climate on a discussion board if the discussion board bans anyone who disagrees with their opinion?
And what does Twitter do if it is other SCIENTISTS who don't agree with the Left's "Settled Science?"

These and many more issues to be resolved as: The Elon Musk fear turns.

 

[Polishprince]

Libs are actually being goofy in the head here.

The average Joe who notices that the ads are banned will think "What is twitter trying to hide". It actually gives the opposition voice more credence as people think that it has something to it else it wouldn't be banned.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Climate Change Endtimers are a crazy cult.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

The Sacred Governmental Church of scientific consensus has deemed any dissent on subjects they approve blasphemy.

*****SMILE*****

 

[johngaltshrugged]

When factual contradictions aren't banned, progressive dogma & narratives fall apart quickly. Their support implodes faster than CNN+ as their lies are exposed to the truth

 

[FA_Q2]

Libs are actually being goofy in the head here.

The average Joe who notices that the ads are banned will think "What is twitter trying to hide". It actually gives the opposition voice more credence as people think that it has something to it else it wouldn't be banned.

THIS right here is the problem.

Banning does not erase the problem, it does not remove the narrative and it does not stop it's dissemination. The best place for it is out in the open where it can be challenged.

 

[daveman]

THIS right here is the problem.

Banning does not erase the problem, it does not remove the narrative and it does not stop it's dissemination. The best place for it is out in the open where it can be challenged.

 

[Muhammed]

I'm old enough to remember that the American left once valued freedom of speech above anything else!

That only applied to porno movies.

 

[Dekster]

Science according to who? This is exactly why someone like Elon Musk needs to take over. The free expression of thoughts needs to be throughout our society, including Twitter.

MSN

www.msn.com

Fear not, Earth Day is only 1 of the 365 days. They will soon forget.

 

[BackAgain]

Sometimes you have to wonder: what do the AGW Faithers even mean when they use the term “settled science”?

Do they mean one could not properly challenge the notion that the Earth “is” flat?

Do they mean one could not properly challenge the notion that the Earth is the center of the universe and all the heavenly bodies revolve around us?

Just because a scientific claim is considered “settled,” does that mean it isn’t allowed to be questioned? Similar to the claim that there is a “consensus.” Oh. So it must be “settled” then?

 

[FA_Q2]

That only applied to porno movies.

No. It was a core concept within the left, they defended the right of free speech for ANYONE. Even those that were abhorrent.

ACLU-EM Defends KKK's Right to Free Speech | American Civil Liberties Union

www.aclu.org

A case, if I am not mistaken, fought by a JEWISH lawyer.

Today, they have embraced authoritarianism:

Once a Bastion of Free Speech, the A.C.L.U. Faces an Identity Crisis (Published 2021)

An organization that has defended the First Amendment rights of Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan is split by an internal debate over whether supporting progressive causes is more important.

www.nytimes.com

 

[munkle]

To ban anything contradicts the very spirit of science, which is to question. If Twitter were around 1,000 years ago we would still believe the sun goes around the Earth.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Science according to who? This is exactly why someone like Elon Musk needs to take over. The free expression of thoughts needs to be throughout our society, including Twitter.

MSN

www.msn.com

Did they deplatform Al Gore yet?

 

[daveman]

Did they deplatform Al Gore yet?

What?! Deplatform the High Priest? How else will he be able to preach his messages of world socialism to the peasants?

 

[Devils_Advocate]

And yet I can get all the porn and gay porn I want off of Twitter…

Amazing!!!

 

[justoffal]

Science according to who? This is exactly why someone like Elon Musk needs to take over. The free expression of thoughts needs to be throughout our society, including Twitter.

MSN

www.msn.com

Not for long...