martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,046
- 34,363
- 2,300
Little Rock was violating a federal law. Maybe that's why?Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.
So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?
Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.
Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.
Strawman.
Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.
So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?
So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?
just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.
True enough but there is no indication the local's aren't up to snuff and usually, the governors requests help.
yeah, i doubt the locals wanted the feds there back in the day.
And why was the issue in Little Rock a national issue and the rioting in Minneapolis a local one?
How does violating federal law make something automatically an national issue?