Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

It's just projection so no evidence is needed. It's clear that Trump is tearing him apart by winning relentlessly. The butthurt is like not many have witnessed before.


How did the last 3 elections go for those folks that Trump backed in NJ, VA and AL????

You INSIST on being one of this forum's MAIN idiots, don't you???...............LOL
 
The server wasn't illegal, and doesn't prove intent of anything but wanting to send and receive email.
It was if it's purpose was to avoid federal records keeping laws.
.
That's a pretty big IF.


Still avoiding her clear instructions to her staff to violate the law I see. And her lying to congress multiple times and the fact that she had top secret restricted access information on a system her IT staff could access any time. Her IT staff didn't have any security clearances. The bitch is guilty as hell, admit it, you just don't care.


.
 
It's just projection so no evidence is needed. It's clear that Trump is tearing him apart by winning relentlessly. The butthurt is like not many have witnessed before.


How did the last 3 elections go for those folks that Trump backed in NJ, VA and AL????

You INSIST on being one of this forum's MAIN idiots, don't you???...............LOL
How have 1,000+ past elections, to include the 2016 Presidential election, gone for the party of sedition, criminals, & perverts?
 
Clinton refused to do that 'honorable' thing. He instead drug the nation through his House Impeachment...


Actually for you history-Challenged morons, the Senate in 1999 found Clinton NOT guilty 55 to 45.
 
Actually for you history-Challenged morons, the Senate in 1999 found Clinton NOT guilty 55 to 45.
Much like Barry did for Hillary in 2016, the Democrats in the Senate protected Slick Willy from full impeahment. He was still Impeached by the House.
 
Much like Barry did for Hillary in 2016, the Democrats in the Senate protected Slick Willy from full impeahment. He was still Impeached by the House.


Don't like Clinton????......I didn't either.......

Want to avoid present day reality???? Keep on bringing up Clinton........LOL
 
Nice to see how triggered you have become, Nat.

:p

Still no evidence
Still a witch hunt
And as the media reported, Mueller is still a f*-up

:p
 
Much like Barry did for Hillary in 2016, the Democrats in the Senate protected Slick Willy from full impeahment. He was still Impeached by the House.


Don't like Clinton????......I didn't either.......

Want to avoid present day reality???? Keep on bringing up Clinton........LOL
. Clinton is the stake in Muellers investigation in trying to convict Trump, because him and Comey have ignored the mountain of evidence against Hillary Clinton his darling Miss Ma Barker and her gang.
Talk about a circus.. Good grief.. Where can I sign up to get free money with all these Demon-crats ??
 
Still avoiding her clear instructions to her staff to violate the law I see.

.
First time I heard that twist. I'm sure if they had her giving illegal instructions to her staff, they would have charged her with it.

But Comey never mentioned any such charge.
 
Still avoiding her clear instructions to her staff to violate the law I see.

.
First time I heard that twist. I'm sure if they had her giving illegal instructions to her staff, they would have charged her with it.

But Comey never mentioned any such charge.


It was very public, just another point Comey chose to bury.

Part of the exchange is redacted, so the context of the emails is unknown, but at one point, Sullivan tells Clinton that aides "say they've had issues sending secure fax. They're working on it."

Clinton responds, "If they can't, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure."


In email, Hillary Clinton tells aide to send talking points "nonsecure" - CBS News

That is a felony.


.
 
Keep dreaming....the last two sure things for you guys...manafort and papadopolous.......one was indicted for bank fraud, the other for lying to the FBI......neither one connected the dots to Trump....so keep dreaming.......
And all 3 of his associates who have been indicted having close connections to Russia.

Who is the third person? You are so damn clueless!
Popodopoulis plead guilty. The point is 3 of his close political associates are either accused or guilty.

Who is the 3rd person? Are you competent in the English language?

Manafort, Papadopoulos, and who?

Gates.

Yeah, that's right! Another nobody with no connection to Trump.
 
[
Appeal to authority - a logical fallacy. Plenty of experts have said there's nothing illegal about what Trump said to Comey.

Except Trump said the same thing to several other people, asking them to also lean on Comey So it's the pattern of Trump trying to stop the Flynn investigation. With the Comey meeting and Comey firing being just two bricks in the legal foundation.
Trump had every right to stop the Flynn investigation. He was Comey's boss.
The president cant obstruct justice. The president can fire the FBI director, but not for purpose of stopping an investigation.

He can fire him for any damn reason he wants.
 
You're wrong there, the server was set up the day AFTER she accepted the appointment to SOS. IF it had been in place years before you might have something.
.

I hate to hand you your ass, but take this. ASS
Timeline of Clinton email server setup

The timeline is as follows:

June 2008: An Apple representative installs a private server in the basement of the Clintons' Chappaqua home - hosts the presidentclinton.com & wjcoffice.com private email domains.

Fall 2008: Clinton aide Justin Cooper – at the suggestion of Huma Abedin – contacts IT specialist Bryan Pagliano about building a new server to host a private Hillary Clinton email domain and to maintain that server (separate from the Apple server).

Fall 2008 to January 2009: Bryan Pagliano uses hardware from Clinton's presidential campaign headquarters and commercially bought equipment to construct the new server.
 

Forum List

Back
Top