Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

[bripat9643]

Comey stated:

1. Hillary broke the law...
- The Dir of the FBI admitted Hillary broke the law

2. '...but she was too stupid to know she was doing it.

As I said Comey is a lawyer, he read Gorin V USA 1941, requiring "intent" to prosecute under 18 USC 793(f)

Gorin V USA 1941 has nothing to do with the law Hillary broke, moron. Gorin was a Soviet spy who couldn't legally have a classified document.

 

[easyt65]

Comey stated:

1. Hillary broke the law...
- The Dir of the FBI admitted Hillary broke the law

2. '...but she was too stupid to know she was doing it.

As I said Comey is a lawyer, he read Gorin V USA 1941, requiring "intent" to prosecute under 18 USC 793(f)

Comey was not a 'lawyer' but was the Director of the FBI responsible for discovering criminal activity, which was found in spades...undeniably. He was neither tasked nor had the authority to act as 'Judge' and/or 'Jury'.

Comey discovered far more evidence against Hillary than has even been suggested against Trump, far more than enough needed to indict.

 

[bripat9643]

Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:

All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.

Cases include Gorin V USA 1941

Comey lied.

 

[OKTexas]

Gross negligence in not in the least vague.

.

"relating to the national defense" is vague. Such that it requires intent of the actions that violate it.

To prosecute 18 USC 793(f) Gorin v. United States (1941) added the requirement of intent.

Argue with the supreme court.

Stop quoting me out of context and the court didn't find national defense vague. I also proved intent, if you need further intent you can add all the false exculpatory statements the bitch made to congress, something dumb ass Comey didn't even consider and admitted it.


.

 

[beagle9]

case law

noun

1. the law as established by the outcome of former cases.

Case Law - Legal Dictionary | Law.com
case law. n. reported decisions of appeals courts and other courts which make new interpretations of the law and, therefore, can be cited as precedents.

. Case law is only a guide for precedent, otherwise only for examples given right ? It doesn't have to be followed to a conclusion right ?? The law is the law, but case law might help to guide a judge dealing with a confusing case or to help him decide a confusing case ?

 

[easyt65]

Gorin V USA 1941 has nothing to do with the law Hillary broke, moron. Gorin was a Soviet spy who couldn't legally have a classified document.

THOUSANDS of UNDENIABLE violations of both the FOIA and Federal Records Act.

Your 'Gorin' BS is an attempt to distract from the inescapable evidence of Hillary crimes.

 

[Crixus]

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78

Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.

Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!

Oh? What they waiting for?

 

[radical right]

Comey said Hillary broke the law but 'was too stupid to know she was doing it'. Although not true / relevanr, Comey made the perfect argument for criminal incompetence.

Comey also read the case law. Gorin V USA 1941 requires "intent" aka Mens Rea in order to prosecute 18 USC 793(f)

 

[OKTexas]

Funny, you didn't hold that opinion when your dear leader was in charge, you called it prosecutorial desecration.


.

I wasn't old enough to vote until 2010, and didn't vote in 2012. I didn't start posting until 2017. Why make shit up?

Nice deflection, now tell us what your opinion was. Did you praise your dear leader for his politicization of law enforcement or not?


.

 

[easyt65]

Comey also read the case law. Gorin V USA 1941 requires "intent" aka Mens Rea in order to prosecute 18 USC 793(f)

Again, your 'Gorin' BS is nothing more than a distraction from Hillary's crimes she committed.

 

[OKTexas]

Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:

All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.

Cases include Gorin V USA 1941

The bitch instructed staff to remove headers and send unclassified, you don't get more willful than that. You got any more targets you want holes shot in?


.

 

[radical right]

Stop quoting me out of context and the court didn't find national defense vague.


.

In Gorin v. United States (1941), the Supreme Court heard a challenge to a conviction of a Navy intelligence official who sold classified material to the Soviet Union on Japanese intelligence operations in the United States. In that case, the defendant was charged with selling information “relating to the national defense” to a foreign power. The defendant argued on appeal that the phrase “relating to the national defense” was unconstitutionally vague, so much so that the defendant was deprived of the ability to predetermine whether his actions were a crime.

Gorin v USA let the phrase stand, but added the requirement of intent, instead of just gross negligence for the law to be constitutional

 

[easyt65]

Comey said there was insufficient evidence to show Clinton had malicious intent. Comey reasoned:

All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information, or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct, or indications of disloyalty to the United States… We do not see those things here.

Cases include Gorin V USA 1941

The bitch instructed staff to remove headers and send unclassified, you don't get more willful than that. You got any more targets you want holes shot in?
.

Game, set, match.

 

[easyt65]

Stop quoting me out of context and the court didn't find national defense vague.


.

In Gorin v. United States (1941), the Supreme Court heard a challenge to a conviction of a Navy intelligence official who sold classified material to the Soviet Union on Japanese intelligence operations in the United States. In that case, the defendant was charged with selling information “relating to the national defense” to a foreign power. The defendant argued on appeal that the phrase “relating to the national defense” was unconstitutionally vague, so much so that the defendant was deprived of the ability to predetermine whether his actions were a crime.

Gorin v USA let the phrase stand, but added the requirement of intent, instead of just gross negligence for the law to be constitutional

Again with the 'Gorin distraction'...

 

[radical right]

The bitch instructed staff to remove headers and send unclassified, you don't get more willful than that. You got any more targets you want holes shot in?


.

You keep jumping the shark. Now you're arguing Clintons staff were the one's guilty of 18 USC 793(f) and NOT Hillary.

 

[radical right]

[
Game, set, match.

easyt65, a-hole, match

 

[easyt65]

THOUSANDS of violations of the FOIA and the Federal Records Act...

Illegal mishandling of classified

'Gross Negligence'

Illegal storage of classified

THOUSANDS of counts of Illegal destruction of classified

Obstruction

Illegal non-compliance of a federal subpoena

...for starters.

F* your useless 'Gorin distraction'.

 

[whitehall]

Maybe the geriatric former prosecutors imagine they indicted Nixon but it didn't happen. Only crazy angry lefties would "depend" on the opinions of these political relics.

 

[radical right]

THOUSANDS of violations of the FOIA and the Federal Records Act...

Illegal mishandling of classified

'Gross Negligence'

Illegal storage of classified

THOUSANDS of counts of Illegal destruction of classified

Obstruction

Illegal non-compliance of a federal subpoena

...for starters.

F* your useless 'Gorin distraction'.

The only felony statute they found was 18 USC 793(f)

Maybe you can list the other statutes violated.

I'll wait.

 

[easyt65]

THOUSANDS of violations of the FOIA and the Federal Records Act...

Illegal mishandling of classified

'Gross Negligence'

Illegal storage of classified

THOUSANDS of counts of Illegal destruction of classified

Obstruction

Illegal non-compliance of a federal subpoena

...for starters.

F* your useless 'Gorin distraction'.

The only felony statute they found was 18 USC 793(f)

Maybe you can list the other statutes violated.

I'll wait.

Her crimes have been mentioned.

In numerous previous threads ever law broken was cited and linked - feel free to look through my posts to find them.

Your 'Gorin distraction' is BS.