Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Her crimes have been mentioned.The only felony statute they found was 18 USC 793(f)
Maybe you can list the other statutes violated.
I'll wait.
In numerous previous threads ever law broken was cited and linked - feel free to look through my posts to find them.
Your 'Gorin distraction' is BS.
As I said - feel free to search my posts for what you ask for, posted dozens of times in the past.Her crimes have been mentioned.The only felony statute they found was 18 USC 793(f)
Maybe you can list the other statutes violated.
I'll wait.
In numerous previous threads ever law broken was cited and linked - feel free to look through my posts to find them.
Your 'Gorin distraction' is BS.
I said statues, so I can look up the requirements for prosecution, and what kind of crime they are. So far it looks like the only felony, required intent, and the others are just violations of regulations, not laws.
But i'll give you a chance to list out the statutes you think Clinton violated.
I'll wait.
Why do snowflakes have to lie all the time?Tell me again why we're talking about Clinton at a time when people around Trump are being indicted for treason against this country. Are you Trumpers dumb as the islamic state members or am I seeing double? WTF?
Her crimes have been mentioned.
In numerous previous threads ever law broken was cited and linked - feel free to look through my posts to find them.
Your 'Gorin distraction' is BS.
So far you only mentioned administrative violations and non-crimes.As I said - feel free to search my posts for what you ask for, posted dozens of times in the past.
. They are looking at precedent, and Clinton is a great one to refer to, and especially after Comey let her go due to powerful influences that he shouldn't have had when doing so. Hey, after that train wreck and fiasco, Trump is a free man whether the Demon-crats like it or not.Tell me again why we're talking about Clinton at a time when people around Trump are being indicted for treason against this country. Are you Trumpers dumb as the islamic state members or am I seeing double? WTF?
Aside from the THOUSANDS of violations of the FOIA and Federal Records Act, Obstruction, 'Gross Negligence', illegal mis-handling of classified, illegal storage of classified, illegal destruction of classified, ibstruction, and illegal non-compliance with a federal subpoena...So far you only mentioned administrative violations and non-crimes.As I said - feel free to search my posts for what you ask for, posted dozens of times in the past.
I dont know what you meant by "obstruction" so i'll just ignore it.
The bitch instructed staff to remove headers and send unclassified, you don't get more willful than that. You got any more targets you want holes shot in?
.
You keep jumping the shark. Now you're arguing Clintons staff were the one's guilty of 18 USC 793(f) and NOT Hillary.
Tell me again why we're talking about Clinton at a time when people around Trump are being indicted for treason against this country. Are you Trumpers dumb as the islamic state members or am I seeing double? WTF?
They're administrate violations. or 18 usc 793 requiring intent.There is enough evidence of crimes perpetrated by her to put her away for life, even if they gave her 6 months for each criminal count.
So far you only mentioned administrative violations and non-crimes.As I said - feel free to search my posts for what you ask for, posted dozens of times in the past.
I dont know what you meant by "obstruction" so i'll just ignore it.
The server wasn't illegal, and doesn't prove intent of anything but wanting to send and receive email.Her instructions proved intent, her false exculpatory statements go to intent, her setting up the server to avoid legal requirements prove intent, there's more intent than you can shake a stick at, your denial just makes you look like a typical pathetic regressive.
.
Destroying materials under subpoena is obstruction, Comey plainly stated in congressional testimony that she destroyed and didn't turn in thousands of work related emails that were under congressional subpoena.
.
The server wasn't illegal, and doesn't prove intent of anything but wanting to send and receive email.Her instructions proved intent, her false exculpatory statements go to intent, her setting up the server to avoid legal requirements prove intent, there's more intent than you can shake a stick at, your denial just makes you look like a typical pathetic regressive.
.
That's a pretty big IF.It was if it's purpose was to avoid federal records keeping laws.The server wasn't illegal, and doesn't prove intent of anything but wanting to send and receive email.
.
Destroying materials under subpoena is obstruction, Comey plainly stated in congressional testimony that she destroyed and didn't turn in thousands of work related emails that were under congressional subpoena.
.
I thought it was a backupl copy that was erased. And it wasn't under subpeona.
The server wasn't illegal, and doesn't prove intent of anything but wanting to send and receive email.Her instructions proved intent, her false exculpatory statements go to intent, her setting up the server to avoid legal requirements prove intent, there's more intent than you can shake a stick at, your denial just makes you look like a typical pathetic regressive.
.
It was if it's purpose was to avoid federal records keeping laws. The way she used it and destroyed evidence on it proves it was for that purpose.
And why do you keep trying to avoid the FACT that she gave explicit instructions to remove a classified header and send classified material on a non-secure system. The fact that they were finally able to send the information secure doesn't negate the FACT that she committed a felony just by issuing the instructions.
.
