Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

[Redfish]

we understand, you hate trump for beating your wonderful crooked Hillary. You hate him for reducing the unemployment rate, for reducing the number on welfare and food stamps, you hate him for enforcing our immigration laws, you hate him because he says what he thinks rather than spitting out bullshit like most politicians. You hate him because he uses twitter to communicate directly to the people without the biased media filters. You hate because he has made the USA respectable once again in international relations. But mostly you hate him because he is making America great again and in so doing showing up the flaws in the dem party and liberalism in general. But mostly you hate him because he is an American winner. MAGA.

Man, another whiny little b***h with Hillary Tourette's syndrome.

Hillary Clinton is the most corrupt human being ever to set foot in Washington DC, and that is saying a lot. Even her supporters in the media and Hollywood are now turning on her now that she has no power. I find it amusing to watch the rats leaving the sinking ship.

That's nice. Delusional and stupid, but nice.

it probably is delusional because in this country today the politically elite are not subject to the laws that apply to you and me. It is highly unlikely that any of them will ever be convicted or anything, even though we all know they are guilty.

Are you happy with some people being above the law? That is the real issue here, not which party is the most corrupt, that none of them are ever held accountable when they violate federal laws.

I'm fine with rooting them all out. I am beholden to ideas, not demagogues. It is interesting that you would ask such a question, given your penchant for saying just about anything to provide cover for the Conman in Chief.

what specifically has Trump done since January 20 that causes you to refer to him as a conman? No talking points, be specific or admit that you are just a hater for no reason.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Redfish, you do not set the conditions for anyone but yourself.

Yeah, President Reality TV Guy is a conman, just not as good as he though, as he now realizes.

 

[Redfish]

The "nation" did no such thing, beagle9. The Trumpanzis snuck in by the skin of their teeth. Trump has continually been dismal in the ratings.

The nation wants Trump gone and functioning normally. That will happen.

wrong again snake jockey, The nation wants jobs, a booming economy, enforcement of our borders and immigration laws, sane foreign policy, sane trade policy, lower taxes, more efficient government, respect for our police and military. Trump is doing all of those things.

for the record, 304 EC votes is not the skin of their teeth. Middle America rejected crooked Hillary, only you loons on the left coast and the crazy NE voted for that lying cheating criminal bitch.

 

[Redfish]

Redfish, you do not set the conditions for anyone but yourself.

Yeah, President Reality TV Guy is a conman, just not as good as he though, as he now realizes.

no specifics, eh? as I suspected, nothing but bullshit talking points.

 

[emilynghiem]

What law did he break?

Dear TroglocratsRdumb
Complaints against Trump include obstruction of Justice, accepting domestic emoluments, and accepting foreign emoluments.

By the time you investigate and prove those, we can prove similar by Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

So take your pick. Bet on which is going to get pushed through first.

The legal lobby and interests running courts and the country have more vested interest in keeping lawyers like Obama and Clinton in power over public opinion. They are more threatened by Trump.

Since he is not a lawyer he doesn't have the conflicts of interest that the Obamas and Clinton's have and their major Democrat supporters that tend to get their money and influence from the lawyers and judges paying each other's campaigns to stay in power.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The "nation" did no such thing, beagle9. The Trumpanzis snuck in by the skin of their teeth. Trump has continually been dismal in the ratings.

The nation wants Trump gone and functioning normally. That will happen.

wrong again snake jockey, The nation wants jobs, a booming economy, enforcement of our borders and immigration laws, sane foreign policy, sane trade policy, lower taxes, more efficient government, respect for our police and military. Trump is doing all of those things.

for the record, 304 EC votes is not the skin of their teeth. Middle America rejected crooked Hillary, only you loons on the left coast and the crazy NE voted for that lying cheating criminal bitch.

Trump is riding the back of an Obama economy. DACA needs to be legalized. There is no sane enforcement of our borders, there is no sane foreign policy, and the rest of the world laughs at Trump.

Trump, like Clinton, has committed obstruction of Justice, accepting domestic emoluments, and accepting foreign emoluments.

I voted for McMullin, the true conservative, while you vote for the liberal neo-fascist.

 

[Redfish]

What law did he break?

Dear TroglocratsRdumb
Complaints against Trump include obstruction of Justice, accepting domestic emoluments, and accepting foreign emoluments.

By the time you investigate and prove those, we can prove similar by Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

So take your pick. Bet on which is going to get pushed through first.

The legal lobby and interests running courts and the country have more vested interest in keeping lawyers like Obama and Clinton in power over public opinion. They are more threatened by Trump.

Since he is not a lawyer he doesn't have the conflicts of interest that the Obamas and Clinton's have and their major Democrat supporters that tend to get their money and influence from the lawyers and judges paying each other's campaigns to stay in power.

democrats have cited statutes against Trump, but there is absolutely no proof of any of their claims----------------can you say witchhunt?

now, on the Clintons, there is tons of evidence of their corruption and violations of federal law.

will any of them ever be convicted? no, because in the America of 2017 political elites are above the laws that apply to you and me. THAT is the real problem.

 

[Redfish]

The "nation" did no such thing, beagle9. The Trumpanzis snuck in by the skin of their teeth. Trump has continually been dismal in the ratings.

The nation wants Trump gone and functioning normally. That will happen.

wrong again snake jockey, The nation wants jobs, a booming economy, enforcement of our borders and immigration laws, sane foreign policy, sane trade policy, lower taxes, more efficient government, respect for our police and military. Trump is doing all of those things.

for the record, 304 EC votes is not the skin of their teeth. Middle America rejected crooked Hillary, only you loons on the left coast and the crazy NE voted for that lying cheating criminal bitch.

Trump is riding the back of an Obama economy. DACA needs to be legalized. There is no sane enforcement of our borders, there is no sane foreign policy, and the rest of the world laughs at Trump.

Trump, like Clinton, has committed obstruction of Justice, accepting domestic emoluments, and accepting foreign emoluments.

I voted for McMullin, the true conservative, while you vote for the liberal neo-fascist.

we have been down this road. you wasted your vote, great. No one cares.

We have sufficient laws on the books regarding immigration and border enforcement, we don't need more laws, just enforce the existing ones.

Why do you want to give citizenship to people here illegally? Why shouldn't they have to get in line with the people who want to come here legally?

Trump has improved relations with the arab world and China in less than a year. The economy is much improved, the market is up, unemployment is down, welfare and food stamp claims are down. What he has done is working. If congress gets off its ass and passes a tax cut bill, the economy will boom and even you will be better off.

 

[Redfish]

What law did he break?

Dear TroglocratsRdumb
Complaints against Trump include obstruction of Justice, accepting domestic emoluments, and accepting foreign emoluments.

By the time you investigate and prove those, we can prove similar by Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

So take your pick. Bet on which is going to get pushed through first.

The legal lobby and interests running courts and the country have more vested interest in keeping lawyers like Obama and Clinton in power over public opinion. They are more threatened by Trump.

Since he is not a lawyer he doesn't have the conflicts of interest that the Obamas and Clinton's have and their major Democrat supporters that tend to get their money and influence from the lawyers and judges paying each other's campaigns to stay in power.

democrats have cited statutes against Trump, but there is absolutely no proof of any of their claims----------------can you say witchhunt?

now, on the Clintons, there is tons of evidence of their corruption and violations of federal law.

will any of them ever be convicted? no, because in the America of 2017 political elites are above the laws that apply to you and me. THAT is the real problem.

wow, jakey boy knows how to click the smiley face. way to go, jakey. maybe tomorrow you can learn to tie your shoes and wipe your ass.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The "nation" did no such thing, beagle9. The Trumpanzis snuck in by the skin of their teeth. Trump has continually been dismal in the ratings.

The nation wants Trump gone and functioning normally. That will happen.

wrong again snake jockey, The nation wants jobs, a booming economy, enforcement of our borders and immigration laws, sane foreign policy, sane trade policy, lower taxes, more efficient government, respect for our police and military. Trump is doing all of those things.

for the record, 304 EC votes is not the skin of their teeth. Middle America rejected crooked Hillary, only you loons on the left coast and the crazy NE voted for that lying cheating criminal bitch.

Trump is riding the back of an Obama economy. DACA needs to be legalized. There is no sane enforcement of our borders, there is no sane foreign policy, and the rest of the world laughs at Trump.

Trump, like Clinton, has committed obstruction of Justice, accepting domestic emoluments, and accepting foreign emoluments.

I voted for McMullin, the true conservative, while you vote for the liberal neo-fascist.

we have been down this road. you wasted your vote, great. No one cares.

We have sufficient laws on the books regarding immigration and border enforcement, we don't need more laws, just enforce the existing ones.

Why do you want to give citizenship to people here illegally? Why shouldn't they have to get in line with the people who want to come here legally?

Trump has improved relations with the arab world and China in less than a year. The economy is much improved, the market is up, unemployment is down, welfare and food stamp claims are down. What he has done is working. If congress gets off its ass and passes a tax cut bill, the economy will boom and even you will be better off.

There you go again with your nativism and white supremacism. Nobody really cares what you think, redfish. DACA immigrants will remain, on a path to citizenship. The economy is that of Obama not Trump. Trump is a crook and will pay the price.

Redfish is going to be very unhappy soon.

 

[playtime]

What law did he break?

remember when i said

obstruction of justice & the emoluments clause just to get started?

well you can add witness tampering too....

A key witness in the Russia probe had a 'lengthy conversation' with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
Natasha Bertrand
Nov. 27, 2017, 12:55 PM

Former CIA Director James Woolsey dined with President Donald Trump last weekend at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida — where, a report said, they had a "lengthy conversation" at the main dining table surrounded by several of Trump's friends, associates, and political allies.

A tipster told Politico's Playbook about the conversation, which raised eyebrows given Woolsey's centrality to the special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser.
[...]
A key witness in the Russia probe had a 'lengthy conversation' with Trump at Mar-a-Lago

 

[JakeStarkey]

Witness tampering now, hmmm.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Just about every politician makes those kinds of mistakes,

... and hires foreign agents to run their campaign and be national security adviser? uh... put down the crack pipe, my man...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

what specifically has Trump done since January 20 that causes you to refer to him as a conman?

Besides a constant stream of embarrassing lies? Besides attempting to talk for 10 minutes at a time about topics he clearly knows less than nothing about? Besides talking about how "great" certain programs are and will be, despite clearly having no plan and knowing nothing about the topic?

Hmm, drawing a blank.

 

[Bush92]

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78

Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.

Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!

Indictments are a joke. Not hard to get.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78

Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.

Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!

Indictments are a joke. Not hard to get.

Federal indictments actually are hard to get. You should read up.

 

[OKTexas]

Just about every politician makes those kinds of mistakes,

... and hires foreign agents to run their campaign and be national security adviser? uh... put down the crack pipe, my man...

Don't expect a serious reply when you take things out of context.


.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78

Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.

Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!

You morons have been saying that for a year.

Get a life.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

You idiots have been trying for a while......

You didn't learn anything from the left's constant pursuite of HIllary ?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Just about every politician makes those kinds of mistakes,

... and hires foreign agents to run their campaign and be national security adviser? uh... put down the crack pipe, my man...

Don't expect a serious reply when you take things out of context.


.

It was not out of context. It was specifically the thought to which you responded. Let's review:

I said: "Specifically, he was a horrible leader completely oblivious to the actions of all of his top officials, and basically either too stupid or to incurious and insulated to understand what was going on all around him with the people he chose."

To which you replied: "Just about every politician makes those kinds of mistakes"

To which I replied: "... and hires foreign agents to run their campaign and be national security adviser?"

Maybe you confused yourself, but there is no context issue here to complain about.