Two Powers That Demand Submission

If you stay tuned...I will shortly show the roots of the Democrat Party are slavery and socialism.....going back 8 or 9 generations.
Your time-travel is making me dizzy. Will you also go back 8 or 9 generations and talk about how the roots of the GOP are reparations and big government?
 
If they actually submitted their will to God they would also treat women as humans instead of property. Instead they submit to their made up bullshit to suppress and torture women who are treated as subhuman entities in their world.
I suspect you are judging Muslims by their worst and Christians by their best.
 
If they actually submitted their will to God they would also treat women as humans instead of property. Instead they submit to their made up bullshit to suppress and torture women who are treated as subhuman entities in their world.
I suspect you are judging Muslims by their worst and Christians by their best.


My thesis today was to prove how intimately Islamofascists and Democrats were united.

You did a better job than I.

Excellent.



BTW....
Do you know the name Nawres Hamid?
 
If they actually submitted their will to God they would also treat women as humans instead of property. Instead they submit to their made up bullshit to suppress and torture women who are treated as subhuman entities in their world.
I suspect you are judging Muslims by their worst and Christians by their best.


My thesis today was to prove how intimately Islamofascists and Democrats were united.

You did a better job than I.

Excellent.



BTW....
Do you know the name Nawres Hamid?
Your aversion to fairness is duly noted and a surprise to no one.

And yes, I know how to Google a name. He is one of those evil Muslims so he must be an Islamo-fascist. You must be very happy that he is dead.
 
If they actually submitted their will to God they would also treat women as humans instead of property. Instead they submit to their made up bullshit to suppress and torture women who are treated as subhuman entities in their world.
I suspect you are judging Muslims by their worst and Christians by their best.


My thesis today was to prove how intimately Islamofascists and Democrats were united.

You did a better job than I.

Excellent.



BTW....
Do you know the name Nawres Hamid?
Your aversion to fairness is duly noted and a surprise to no one.

And yes, I know how to Google a name. He is one of those evil Muslims so he must be an Islamo-fascist. You must be very happy that he is dead.





Can you state who Nawred Hamid was, and why he should be in the news.....and why his name isn't?


Let me start you in the right direction: don't us Google, use a more neutral source, like Duckduckgo or Gibiru....



Did you understand the question?
Can you state who Nawred Hamid was, and why he should be in the news.....and why his name isn't?
 
If they actually submitted their will to God they would also treat women as humans instead of property. Instead they submit to their made up bullshit to suppress and torture women who are treated as subhuman entities in their world.
I suspect you are judging Muslims by their worst and Christians by their best.


My thesis today was to prove how intimately Islamofascists and Democrats were united.

You did a better job than I.

Excellent.



BTW....
Do you know the name Nawres Hamid?

I know Nawres

He owns the Kwik-E- Mart down the street
Always sells me Lottery Tickets
I don’t win, but he is a nice guy
 
Which party today stands for reparations and growing government?
Ohhhhhh, you're talking about TODAY? You always accuse the Dems of being the party of slavery so I thought you were talking about the each party in an historical context. Which is it, since you can't have it both ways (only if you care about honesty of course)? Are we judging the Dems by their history or by their policies today?



"... I thought you were talking about the each party in an historical context. "

First of all, you've never 'thought' anything.....you blindly accept what your Democrat masters tell you, and then you parrot same.





Now....for 'historical context'.....

7. The two cornerstones of the Democrat Party have always been slavery and socialism…

George Fitzhugh (November 4, 1806 – July 30, 1881) was the Democrat social theorist who published racial and slavery-based sociological theories in the antebellum era.


" What society needed was slavery, not just for blacks, but for whites as well. "Slavery," "is a form, and the very best form, of socialism."

"Socialism," Proposes to do away with free competition; to afford protection and support at all times to the laboring class; to bring about, at least, a qualified community of property, and to associate labor. All these purposes, slavery fully land perfectly attains. [...] Socialism is already slavery in all save the master... Our only quarrel with Socialism is, that it will not honestly admit that it owes its recent revival to the failure of universal liberty, and is seeking to bring about slavery again in some form.”
Fitzhugh, George (1854 Sociology for the South, p. 48)




And nothing has changed in 8 or 9 generations.....still the same aims of the Democrats.

Bet you're really sorry you've never read a book, huh?
 
That’s Islam, which means ‘submission,’ and the Democrat Party, which revealed itself this week as the Democrat doppelganger of Iran.

Do you know the name Nawres Hamid?




1. In a less-than-surprising development, the Democrat Party has made clear its choice in the missile exchange- between America and Iran- missiles from Iran, which Obama funded and greenlighted-

…and the Party's choice isn’t America. …… it's the 7th century savage regime.
When America is under attack, Democrats rush to the aid of the enemy, hand-tying of the American President and hand-wring over the dead terrorists.
No one should be surprised after 8 year of what all evidence indicates as having fronted a Muslim as President….yes, that’s what analysis proves.




2. "Revisiting the link between leftism and Islamism

An enemy of the United States is dead but only the right is celebrating. Meanwhile Leftists like Rose McGowan are mourning and Marxists like Colin Kaepernick are condemning America’s actions. While Republicans celebrated the tactical military victory, Democrats in Congress like Ilhan Omar and Nancy Pelosi are, to put their reactions mildly, not. It is my hope to provide an explanation for the left’s activities following the the death of Qasem Soleimani, Iran’s top general. The leftist media has been shilling for Iran and not all of it is usual partisanship. Indeed, there is a much deeper ideological alliance at play.

"....Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Rashida Tliab are all from the Justice Democrats. The group was founded by Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks,… .The Young Turks is a media group named after the Islamist Turkish political group that performed the Armenian Holocaust. “
Revisiting the link between leftism and Islamism




3. Democrat/Muslim activist: “Linda Sarsour Asks Muslims To Form "Jihad" Against Trump, Not To Assimilate”
Linda Sarsour Asks Muslims To Form "Jihad" Against Trump, Not To Assimilate


4. The Democrat's produced as their expert on impeachment Professor Noah Feldman....a dunce who has written that Sharia is better than our Constitution. A Law Professor no less. Here are a few demands that are aspects of Sharia:

A) Killing of Apostates, those who decide to leave the religion

B) Beating of women, and stoning them to death for infractions

C) Calling Jews Pigs and Monkeys

D) Declaring war on non-Muslims either to convert them, or to have them pay a second-class citizen tax

E) Enslave and rape female war prisoners, as in Darfur

F) Fight and kill Jews as preparation for the end days

G) Kill gays




Soooo......still don't know the name Nawres Hamid?
We have so much work to do. We are a self-governing people and clearly we have not been minding the store. Thank goodness we have the leadership in the WH today that we do, but time is short and we need to keep after it.
 
Which party today stands for reparations and growing government?
Ohhhhhh, you're talking about TODAY? You always accuse the Dems of being the party of slavery so I thought you were talking about the each party in an historical context. Which is it, since you can't have it both ways (only if you care about honesty of course)? Are we judging the Dems by their history or by their policies today?



"... I thought you were talking about the each party in an historical context. "

First of all, you've never 'thought' anything.....you blindly accept what your Democrat masters tell you, and then you parrot same.





Now....for 'historical context'.....

7. The two cornerstones of the Democrat Party have always been slavery and socialism…

George Fitzhugh (November 4, 1806 – July 30, 1881) was the Democrat social theorist who published racial and slavery-based sociological theories in the antebellum era.


" What society needed was slavery, not just for blacks, but for whites as well. "Slavery," "is a form, and the very best form, of socialism."

"Socialism," Proposes to do away with free competition; to afford protection and support at all times to the laboring class; to bring about, at least, a qualified community of property, and to associate labor. All these purposes, slavery fully land perfectly attains. [...] Socialism is already slavery in all save the master... Our only quarrel with Socialism is, that it will not honestly admit that it owes its recent revival to the failure of universal liberty, and is seeking to bring about slavery again in some form.”
Fitzhugh, George (1854 Sociology for the South, p. 48)




And nothing has changed in 8 or 9 generations.....still the same aims of the Democrats.

Bet you're really sorry you've never read a book, huh?
Now....for some additional 'historical context'.....
Summary: A Republican plan to confiscate private property owned by Whites and give ownership of it to Blacks. Sounds a lot like reparations to me so I guess we can agree that a cornerstone of the GOP is giving free stuff to Blacks.
 
Which party today stands for reparations and growing government?
Ohhhhhh, you're talking about TODAY? You always accuse the Dems of being the party of slavery so I thought you were talking about the each party in an historical context. Which is it, since you can't have it both ways (only if you care about honesty of course)? Are we judging the Dems by their history or by their policies today?



"... I thought you were talking about the each party in an historical context. "

First of all, you've never 'thought' anything.....you blindly accept what your Democrat masters tell you, and then you parrot same.





Now....for 'historical context'.....

7. The two cornerstones of the Democrat Party have always been slavery and socialism…

George Fitzhugh (November 4, 1806 – July 30, 1881) was the Democrat social theorist who published racial and slavery-based sociological theories in the antebellum era.


" What society needed was slavery, not just for blacks, but for whites as well. "Slavery," "is a form, and the very best form, of socialism."

"Socialism," Proposes to do away with free competition; to afford protection and support at all times to the laboring class; to bring about, at least, a qualified community of property, and to associate labor. All these purposes, slavery fully land perfectly attains. [...] Socialism is already slavery in all save the master... Our only quarrel with Socialism is, that it will not honestly admit that it owes its recent revival to the failure of universal liberty, and is seeking to bring about slavery again in some form.”
Fitzhugh, George (1854 Sociology for the South, p. 48)




And nothing has changed in 8 or 9 generations.....still the same aims of the Democrats.

Bet you're really sorry you've never read a book, huh?
Now....for some additional 'historical context'.....
Summary: A Republican plan to confiscate private property owned by Whites and give ownership of it to Blacks. Sounds a lot like reparations to me so I guess we can agree that a cornerstone of the GOP is giving free stuff to Blacks.

"...a lot like reparations to me so I guess we can agree that a cornerstone of the GOP is giving free stuff to Blacks."

I love it when you post what is clearly the very opposite of the truth.


The order was revoked, not implemented.
https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/shermans-field-order-no-15





Now..facts: the Democrat Party is the party of reparations and of big government.

Only a fool like you would deny that.


BTW....not just for black....they want reparations for those arrested for drug crimes.


It is the party of felons, criminals, and chaos.


"New York Democrats on Eliminating Cash Bail: Not If, But How"
New York Democrats on Eliminating Cash Bail: Not If, But How



"Nearly 900 city jailbirds could be celebrating Christmas early courtesy of Gov. Andrew Cuomo and a plan to quietly free them before the state’s bail-reform law goes into effect next year, The Post has learned.

And if that weren’t enough of a gift, Mayor Bill de Blasio is promising to follow up with even more presents for the lucky accused criminals — by giving them free baseball tickets, movie passes and gift cards to encourage them to return to court, sources familiar with the program said."
https://nypost.com/2019/11/03/nearl...eed-even-before-bail-reform-law-takes-effect/



Democrats....the party of slavery, socialism, and sociopaths.

And, to include you....pathological liars.
 
Now....for some additional 'historical context'.....
Summary: A Republican plan to confiscate private property owned by Whites and give ownership of it to Blacks. Sounds a lot like reparations to me so I guess we can agree that a cornerstone of the GOP is giving free stuff to Blacks.

"...a lot like reparations to me so I guess we can agree that a cornerstone of the GOP is giving free stuff to Blacks."

I love it when you post what is clearly the very opposite of the truth.

The order was revoked, not implemented.
https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/shermans-field-order-no-15
The order for confiscation of private property and reparations for Blacks was indeed revoked. By a DEMOCRAT!
 
Now....for some additional 'historical context'.....
Summary: A Republican plan to confiscate private property owned by Whites and give ownership of it to Blacks. Sounds a lot like reparations to me so I guess we can agree that a cornerstone of the GOP is giving free stuff to Blacks.

"...a lot like reparations to me so I guess we can agree that a cornerstone of the GOP is giving free stuff to Blacks."

I love it when you post what is clearly the very opposite of the truth.

The order was revoked, not implemented.
https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/shermans-field-order-no-15
The order for confiscation of private property and reparations for Blacks was indeed revoked. By a DEMOCRAT!
...who became President when a Democrat murdered the first Republican President.



Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.
 
Now..facts: the Democrat Party is the party of reparations and of big government.

Only a fool like you would deny that.
If the Democrat Party today is the party of reparations and of big government, it is something they inherited from the GOP.

Only a fool like you would deny that.

Likewise, the GOP of today inherited the toleration of anti-government, Right-wing militias (like the old KKK) and limitation of minority voting rights from the Democrats (really the Dixiecrats).

Only a fool like you would deny that.
 
Now..facts: the Democrat Party is the party of reparations and of big government.

Only a fool like you would deny that.
If the Democrat Party today is the party of reparations and of big government, it is something they inherited from the GOP.

Only a fool like you would deny that.

Likewise, the GOP of today inherited the toleration of anti-government, Right-wing militias (like the old KKK) and limitation of minority voting rights from the Democrats (really the Dixiecrats).

Only a fool like you would deny that.



Let's leave the determination up to readers of our posts....
 
Now..facts: the Democrat Party is the party of reparations and of big government.

Only a fool like you would deny that.
If the Democrat Party today is the party of reparations and of big government, it is something they inherited from the GOP.

Only a fool like you would deny that.

Likewise, the GOP of today inherited the toleration of anti-government, Right-wing militias (like the old KKK) and limitation of minority voting rights from the Democrats (really the Dixiecrats).

Only a fool like you would deny that.



You seem not to have gotten around to this:


Can you state who Nawred Hamid was, and why he should be in the news.....and why his name isn't?


Let me start you in the right direction: don't us Google, use a more neutral source, like Duckduckgo or Gibiru....



Did you understand the question?
Can you state who Nawred Hamid was, and why he should be in the news.....and why his name isn't?
 
If they actually submitted their will to God they would also treat women as humans instead of property. Instead they submit to their made up bullshit to suppress and torture women who are treated as subhuman entities in their world.
I suspect you are judging Muslims by their worst and Christians by their best.
No other religion has vowed to kill infidels. Even the worst of Christians knows that killing people for their beliefs is wrong in God's eyes. Christianity does not bring forth so many killers and terrorist willing to kill innocent people in martyr schemes either, Hindi don't do this, Jews don't do it generally and neither do Buddhist. That lies with Islamic peeps. If you can point out a nation where it is mainly Christians that allow for the standard abuse of women show it to me.
 
Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.
So Booth was a liberal? Absurd, just like if you argued he was apolitical. He left plenty of letters citing his political leanings. Link or lie?
 
8. Socialism and Islamofascism combined….the Democrat carrots and peas.
It's what sunk Democrat Bernie Sanders' pal, Jeremy Corbyn.


That’s where we find the how smoothly Democrats bond with Islamofascists…an example is the EU.


“The answer ought to be found in Europe. The EU has seen the alliance of Islamist and socialists progress further. Islam has been trying to invade Europe since before the political left-wing was ever a thing. Through mass immigration, the cultural identities of European nations have been under attack and gradually eroded. Only in the last month has the UK solidified its desire for independence and national identity, but let’s note that the UK does not really have a right=wing, nor do most European nations. Assimilation is almost nonexistent in European immigration practices as it compares to America. Such gradual eroding of American culture is possible here, though the likes of CAIR will play a minor role with the country’s massive illegal immigration burden being the much larger flame.” Revisiting the link between leftism and Islamism


Illegal immigration, yet another anti-America aspect of the Democrat Party.
The Muslim former President, Hussein, actually told illegals to vote...

When you vote, you’re a citizen yourself


Cavuoto:
Obama encouraging illegal immigrants to vote?
 
Historic review: every presidential assassin in the history of the nation has been a liberal- or has not been associated with a political outlook- none were right-wingers.
So Booth was a liberal? Absurd, just like if you argued he was apolitical. He left plenty of letters citing his political leanings. Link or lie?

"So Booth was a liberal? Absurd, ..."

Watch me smash yet another verbal pie in your ugly kisser:

John Wilkes Booth was opposed to President Lincoln’s Republican war policies. His letter to is family explained he was furious with Lincoln for having brought war to the South!
THE MURDERER OF MR. LINCOLN.; Extraordinary Letter of John Wilkes Booth Proof that He Meditated His Crime Months Ago His Excuses for the Contemplated Act His Participation in the Execution of John Brown. Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction. Fires. The Seventh Ward Fire Note from Chief Engineer Decker.



Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, “…an angry Copperhead, a.k.a., ‘peace democrat,’ (when that meant pro-slavery, of course.) John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia
John Wilkes Booth




"In the 1860s, the Copperheads comprised a vocal faction of Democrats in the Northern United States of the Union who opposed the American Civil War, wanting an immediate peace settlement with the Confederates. Republicans started calling anti-war Democrats "Copperheads", likening them to the venomous snake."
Copperhead (politics) - Wikipedia




Did you forget that I'm never wrong?????


Bet you really wish you had ever read a book, huh?
 
Can you state who Nawred Hamid was, and why he should be in the news.....and why his name isn't?
Thanks for the search tip. Duckduckgo led me to this:

If Donald Trump had his way, Nawres Hamid would never have been allowed into America. Hamid was the U.S. military contractor killed on a military base in Iraq on December 27.

No group has taken responsibility for the attack. Indications are ISIS, which is said to “operate a small insurgency” in the area, may have carried out the deadly rocket attack. Despite the lack of evidence, Trump blamed Iraq’s next-door neighbor. “Iran killed an American contractor, wounding many. We strongly responded, and always will,” Trump said days later.
No clue why you don't think he is in the news, I had no trouble finding him?
 

Forum List

Back
Top