Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The labor statistics, sure ...Dispute these numbers if you can. . . .
Private employers added 212,00 jobs, moving the total of private-sector jobs created in 2011 to 1.9 million. Governments, particularly at the local level, cut jobs 12,000 last month holding overall job growth for the year to 1.6 million.
U.S. adds 200,000 jobs in Dec.; unemployment drops to 8.5% - The Washington Post
Did I hear someone say no private sector jobs were being created?
BLS disagrees with you. They show the private sector began growing 22 months ago and have posted gains every month since...If 48 months out of 96 is shitty then what do you call 3 out of 36? Barfalacious? Shitocious?
Whatever, Obama's record is far worse than Bush's. And Bush probably would have done better had the Dems not taken control of Congress in '06.
I'm not sure what you're babbling about. If you're talking about Obama, private sector jobs have been growing every month for the past two or so years.
His first year sucked. But he inherited an economy already in free fall. The economy doesn't turn on a dime.
I like how you blame Congress when the Republicans have the White House, and the president when the Republicans control the House. What's it like to have no intellectual integrity, at all?
We ddint have positive private sector hiring until about 3 months ago.
Umm, no, from 2007. 2006, the year the housing bubble started to burst, Republicans still controlled the Congress.Dems controlled congress from 06 on. Obama isn't solely to blame. He outsourced a lot of policy to Pelosi and Reid.
I'm not sure what you're babbling about. If you're talking about Obama, private sector jobs have been growing every month for the past two or so years.
His first year sucked. But he inherited an economy already in free fall. The economy doesn't turn on a dime.
I like how you blame Congress when the Republicans have the White House, and the president when the Republicans control the House. What's it like to have no intellectual integrity, at all?
We ddint have positive private sector hiring until about 3 months ago.
Dems controlled congress from 06 on. Obama isn't solely to blame. He outsourced a lot of policy to Pelosi and Reid.
Private employment has risen each month over the past 23 months.
Data is from here.
Table B-1. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail [In thousands]
We ddint have positive private sector hiring until about 3 months ago.
Dems controlled congress from 06 on. Obama isn't solely to blame. He outsourced a lot of policy to Pelosi and Reid.
Private employment has risen each month over the past 23 months.
Data is from here.
Table B-1. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail [In thousands]
I would suggest you do your own math....
Like I have stated previously - -350 + 100 is NEGATIVE 250...
When you only count the positives and not the negatives one could come up with a dishonest graph like that and only ignorant sheep would accept the said graph...
Say what? It dropped by 50,000 -- and that is in large part to people retiring, not so much people forced out of the labor force.Private employers added 212,00 jobs, moving the total of private-sector jobs created in 2011 to 1.9 million. Governments, particularly at the local level, cut jobs — 12,000 last month — holding overall job growth for the year to 1.6 million.
U.S. adds 200,000 jobs in Dec.; unemployment drops to 8.5% - The Washington Post
Did I hear someone say no private sector jobs were being created?
And our workforce dropped significantly...........
Where do you get your numbers from?The unemployment rate is extremely deceptive......
Those who outlived their unemployment benefits or don't qualify for them in the first place aren't counted... Those who have never held a job but are able to work (welfare fucks) aren't counted.
The equation used to measure the unemployment rate is extremely flawed....
Not to mention our fucking lying media only reports how many jobs are created and hardly EVER mentions how many jobs were lost.....
-350 jobs + 100 jobs is STILL -250 jobs... But Obamabots will sit there and brag about +100 jobs when 250 jobs were lost, or that the workforce shrunk...
Of course only a progressive would be dumb enough not to investigate the shit the media spews - NO they put total faith in the media. They read an article and know everything about the subject all of a sudden...
Say what? It dropped by 50,000 -- and that is in large part to people retiring, not so much people forced out of the labor force.Private employers added 212,00 jobs, moving the total of private-sector jobs created in 2011 to 1.9 million. Governments, particularly at the local level, cut jobs — 12,000 last month — holding overall job growth for the year to 1.6 million.
U.S. adds 200,000 jobs in Dec.; unemployment drops to 8.5% - The Washington Post
Did I hear someone say no private sector jobs were being created?
And our workforce dropped significantly...........
Where do you get your numbers from?The unemployment rate is extremely deceptive......
Those who outlived their unemployment benefits or don't qualify for them in the first place aren't counted... Those who have never held a job but are able to work (welfare fucks) aren't counted.
The equation used to measure the unemployment rate is extremely flawed....
Not to mention our fucking lying media only reports how many jobs are created and hardly EVER mentions how many jobs were lost.....
-350 jobs + 100 jobs is STILL -250 jobs... But Obamabots will sit there and brag about +100 jobs when 250 jobs were lost, or that the workforce shrunk...
Of course only a progressive would be dumb enough not to investigate the shit the media spews - NO they put total faith in the media. They read an article and know everything about the subject all of a sudden...
In December, unemployment fell by 226,000
BLS: Unemployment Level
Discouraged workers fell by 151,000
BLS: Discouraged
Labor force fell by 50,000 jobs
BLS: Labor Force
176,000 jobs were gained
BLS: Employment Level
Show where the BLS indicates greater job losses than job gains? Because I just showed Decembers numbers and that doesn't match the numbers you claim to have acquired from the BLS.Say what? It dropped by 50,000 -- and that is in large part to people retiring, not so much people forced out of the labor force.And our workforce dropped significantly...........
Where do you get your numbers from?The unemployment rate is extremely deceptive......
Those who outlived their unemployment benefits or don't qualify for them in the first place aren't counted... Those who have never held a job but are able to work (welfare fucks) aren't counted.
The equation used to measure the unemployment rate is extremely flawed....
Not to mention our fucking lying media only reports how many jobs are created and hardly EVER mentions how many jobs were lost.....
-350 jobs + 100 jobs is STILL -250 jobs... But Obamabots will sit there and brag about +100 jobs when 250 jobs were lost, or that the workforce shrunk...
Of course only a progressive would be dumb enough not to investigate the shit the media spews - NO they put total faith in the media. They read an article and know everything about the subject all of a sudden...
In December, unemployment fell by 226,000
BLS: Unemployment Level
Discouraged workers fell by 151,000
BLS: Discouraged
Labor force fell by 50,000 jobs
BLS: Labor Force
176,000 jobs were gained
BLS: Employment Level
The department of labor statistics..............
(which is always wrong)
Private employers added 212,00 jobs, moving the total of private-sector jobs created in 2011 to 1.9 million. Governments, particularly at the local level, cut jobs 12,000 last month holding overall job growth for the year to 1.6 million.
U.S. adds 200,000 jobs in Dec.; unemployment drops to 8.5% - The Washington Post
Did I hear someone say no private sector jobs were being created?
Completely Bogus Crap.
200k Jobs added is ok, but not nearly enough. The only reason the Unemployment number is falling is because Millions of People are reaching 99 weeks every week and simply falling of the rolls. Still others are deciding to retire Early, or stop looking and just live off savings or what ever. Then there are the Millions who are under employed in Part time Jobs.
The Real number is about 16%.
But you are right about one thing, if Obama can get that Bogus cooked number under 8% before the Election he will likely win. Because enough people don't pay close enough attention to understand just how dishonest that Number, and this President really is.
Private employers added 212,00 jobs, moving the total of private-sector jobs created in 2011 to 1.9 million. Governments, particularly at the local level, cut jobs 12,000 last month holding overall job growth for the year to 1.6 million.
U.S. adds 200,000 jobs in Dec.; unemployment drops to 8.5% - The Washington Post
Did I hear someone say no private sector jobs were being created?
Completely Bogus Crap.
200k Jobs added is ok, but not nearly enough. The only reason the Unemployment number is falling is because Millions of People are reaching 99 weeks every week and simply falling of the rolls. Still others are deciding to retire Early, or stop looking and just live off savings or what ever. Then there are the Millions who are under employed in Part time Jobs.
The Real number is about 16%.
But you are right about one thing, if Obama can get that Bogus cooked number under 8% before the Election he will likely win. Because enough people don't pay close enough attention to understand just how dishonest that Number, and this President really is.
The number of people getting unemployment benefits IS NOT THE SAME as the number of people who are unemployed. I've seen this pointed out over and over again, yet you people keep repeating it. Why?
Show where the BLS indicates greater job losses than job gains? Because I just showed Decembers numbers and that doesn't match the numbers you claim to have acquired from the BLS.Say what? It dropped by 50,000 -- and that is in large part to people retiring, not so much people forced out of the labor force.
Where do you get your numbers from?
In December, unemployment fell by 226,000
BLS: Unemployment Level
Discouraged workers fell by 151,000
BLS: Discouraged
Labor force fell by 50,000 jobs
BLS: Labor Force
176,000 jobs were gained
BLS: Employment Level
The department of labor statistics..............
(which is always wrong)
The Labor Dept maintains anything below 5% is considered " effective full employment".He might. He might not.
But your case is hard to make given that as recently as 2007 the unemployment rate was about 5%, and had been that for nearly a decade.
I see that bigotry has made you stupid, as it always does.
It was 4.2% when Bush took office, got up to 6.3%, and down to 5.5%. After that wild ride, people still re-elected Bush.
This time, it was 7.8 when Obama took office, hit a high of 10% and is now down to 8.5%. It could be below 7.5% by November, and if so, Obama can claim success. Doesn't deserve to, the bigger problems aren't being addressed and he's drinking the same Free Trade Koolaid that the rest of the establishment is drinking.
Obama's not running against 2007, he's running against the situation he found in 2009 when he took office. I think his performance has been limp, but not enough to vote for degenerate like Romney.
You realize even 6% is historically pretty good. And that was high mark of Bush's tenure.
So obviously job growth was fine under Bush and all the screaming about off-shoring is coming from people with very short memories.
But I never understood the fixation with factory jobs. WHo the hell wants to work in a factory?
Walmart employees actually have pretty good benefits. Better than most private sector companies.You realize even 6% is historically pretty good. And that was high mark of Bush's tenure.
So obviously job growth was fine under Bush and all the screaming about off-shoring is coming from people with very short memories.
Actualy, the high point was 7.8 when he left. and the economy was bleeding jobs at that point.
And, yes, the offshoring is a problem. Replacing good paying union jobs with benefits with jobs at Wal Mart without benefits isn't an improvement, it's a step back.
But I never understood the fixation with factory jobs. WHo the hell wants to work in a factory?
I work in a factory, and I rather enjoy it. Mind you, I'm in the office, but I go down to the line pretty often to make sure things are going well.
If you don't understand why we need manufacturing capability, then I can only conclude you are some kind of high-functioning retard or something.
Because the BLS unemployment stats DO NOT include those people who are not working and have either given up or have exhausted their unemployment benefits. As far as the BLS is concerned those people no longer exist for purposes of coming up with a percentage of unemployed people..Private employers added 212,00 jobs, moving the total of private-sector jobs created in 2011 to 1.9 million. Governments, particularly at the local level, cut jobs 12,000 last month holding overall job growth for the year to 1.6 million.
U.S. adds 200,000 jobs in Dec.; unemployment drops to 8.5% - The Washington Post
Did I hear someone say no private sector jobs were being created?
Completely Bogus Crap.
200k Jobs added is ok, but not nearly enough. The only reason the Unemployment number is falling is because Millions of People are reaching 99 weeks every week and simply falling of the rolls. Still others are deciding to retire Early, or stop looking and just live off savings or what ever. Then there are the Millions who are under employed in Part time Jobs.
The Real number is about 16%.
But you are right about one thing, if Obama can get that Bogus cooked number under 8% before the Election he will likely win. Because enough people don't pay close enough attention to understand just how dishonest that Number, and this President really is.
The number of people getting unemployment benefits IS NOT THE SAME as the number of people who are unemployed. I've seen this pointed out over and over again, yet you people keep repeating it. Why?
Even with the positive report, stubborn problems remain. Some 5.6 million Americans 42.5 percent of the unemployed have been jobless for more than six months, a figure that was unchanged in December.
Also, minority joblessness remained at catastrophic levels: The black unemployment rate was 15.8 percent in December, and the jobless rate for Hispanics was 11 percent.
Nah, you're just a fucking liar. The numbers you posted don't appear on the BLS website. I already posted the numbers from their site, along with links to their site, and their numbers don't match yours. Truth be told, that's the real reason you won't post them.Show where the BLS indicates greater job losses than job gains? Because I just showed Decembers numbers and that doesn't match the numbers you claim to have acquired from the BLS.
The department of labor statistics..............
(which is always wrong)
I'm not going to go dig for you.......
You go dig for yourself...
I'm not your fucking teacher...
If you paid me I would give you a fantastic presentation..
If you're fucking interested then you can do the math....
You wont even know where to start.....
Here I'll be charitable..
Unemployment Rate = Number of Unemployed / Total Labor Force
In 2010 the country vigorously rejected Obamanomics and the Democratic rule and restored the House to a Republican majority. The GOP blocked any further plans of the Left. This lead to a drop in unemployment as companies were more confident they would not be facing any more big costs.
