U.S. Armed Forces Are Defenders of Liberty, Not Tools of Oppression

[harmonica]

Just fine and dandy. Your comrades ISIS are all dead and the people of Mosul are liberated.

Or does Soros have you believing the US military is occupying Iraq as a colony?

Just fine and dandy. Your comrades ISIS are all dead and the people of Mosul are liberated.

Or does Soros have you believing the US military is occupying Iraq as a colony?

Even $oro$ understands why both major partie$ support eternal war.
When are you planning to catch on?

Mission was accomplished, ignoramus. Saddam was in a prison cell, the purpose of the mission, ignoramus.

Fifteen Saudi hijackers attack on 911, and you're still blaming Saddam?

Life Among the Rubble: Mosul 18 Months after “Liberation”

"Daesh (a.k.a., Islamic State) was largely the by-product of US-British savagery in Iraq. Having left the nation politically and infrastructurally decimated by decades of unprecedented sanctions, military occupation, and divide-and-conquer strategizing, the more extreme Islamic elements in Iraq—backed by foreign powers for their own geostrategic interests—sprouted from fertile ground.

"The US Army’s Strategic Studies Institute launched an unusually scathing attack on the Bush II administration’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 and how it and the succeeding Obama administration handled the occupation.

"Ignoring moral questions and focusing solely on tactics, as well as blaming the US-backed politician Ahmed Chalabi, the report (worth quoting at length) says that the growth of the Islamic State Organization (ISO):"

the ''''''invasion''' in 2003 was directly caused by Saddam who:
started not one but TWO wars
gassed his own people
violated the cease fire
etc --just like hitler's craziness
..if Saddam had not attacked Kuwait, there would never have been an ''''invasion''---and it wasn't an invasion--it was a continuation of PG1

the ''''''invasion''' in 2003 was directly caused by Saddam who:
started not one but TWO wars
gassed his own people
violated the cease fire
etc --just like hitler's craziness
..if Saddam had not attacked Kuwait, there would never have been an ''''invasion''---and it wasn't an invasion--it was a continuation of PG1

Saddam posed no threat to his neighbors in 2003 compared to the racist state of Israel, for example.

Saddam would never have come to power in Iraq without CIA help, and he would not have invaded Kuwait with HW's duplicitous OK.

There is only one nation on this planet that has MURDERED millions of innocent human beings on the opposite side of the globe from its homeland since 1945.

Which one is it?

"IN CONCLUSION

"Instead of being decapitated and immolated by Daesh, thousands of inhabitants of Mosul were blown to pieces and incinerated by US-British bombs. UN International Organization for Migration’s recent report notes that, at its peak, nearly one million residents fled the city.

"By now, 350,000 or so remain 'internally displaced persons' (IDPs). 'Many IDPs are unable to return because their houses have been destroyed, either by [Daesh] or during the battle, and renting or buying new property is prohibitively expensive.'

"They are some of the millions of refugees generated by the US-British imperial war machine. Mosul is a small part of a much larger tragedy: one of US global hegemony in the age of Full Spectrum Dominance."

Life Among the Rubble: Mosul 18 Months after “Liberation”

hahahahahhahahaha---if a nation violates a CEASE FIRE agreement, what do you think that means?? hahahah
1. he started 2 wars
2. he is violating a cease fire meaning he's saying FU to the world--AGAIN
3. he produced and USED WMA before---DUH!!! and you are going to let him do whatever he wants??? very DUMB very DUMB
4. Israel never started wars--they always defended themselves from attacks
ahahahahahahahahhahaha

 

[harmonica]

Just fine and dandy. Your comrades ISIS are all dead and the people of Mosul are liberated.

Or does Soros have you believing the US military is occupying Iraq as a colony?

Just fine and dandy. Your comrades ISIS are all dead and the people of Mosul are liberated.

Or does Soros have you believing the US military is occupying Iraq as a colony?

Even $oro$ understands why both major partie$ support eternal war.
When are you planning to catch on?

Mission was accomplished, ignoramus. Saddam was in a prison cell, the purpose of the mission, ignoramus.

Fifteen Saudi hijackers attack on 911, and you're still blaming Saddam?

Life Among the Rubble: Mosul 18 Months after “Liberation”

"Daesh (a.k.a., Islamic State) was largely the by-product of US-British savagery in Iraq. Having left the nation politically and infrastructurally decimated by decades of unprecedented sanctions, military occupation, and divide-and-conquer strategizing, the more extreme Islamic elements in Iraq—backed by foreign powers for their own geostrategic interests—sprouted from fertile ground.

"The US Army’s Strategic Studies Institute launched an unusually scathing attack on the Bush II administration’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 and how it and the succeeding Obama administration handled the occupation.

"Ignoring moral questions and focusing solely on tactics, as well as blaming the US-backed politician Ahmed Chalabi, the report (worth quoting at length) says that the growth of the Islamic State Organization (ISO):"

the ''''''invasion''' in 2003 was directly caused by Saddam who:
started not one but TWO wars
gassed his own people
violated the cease fire
etc --just like hitler's craziness
..if Saddam had not attacked Kuwait, there would never have been an ''''invasion''---and it wasn't an invasion--it was a continuation of PG1

the ''''''invasion''' in 2003 was directly caused by Saddam who:
started not one but TWO wars
gassed his own people
violated the cease fire
etc --just like hitler's craziness
..if Saddam had not attacked Kuwait, there would never have been an ''''invasion''---and it wasn't an invasion--it was a continuation of PG1

Saddam posed no threat to his neighbors in 2003 compared to the racist state of Israel, for example.

Saddam would never have come to power in Iraq without CIA help, and he would not have invaded Kuwait with HW's duplicitous OK.

There is only one nation on this planet that has MURDERED millions of innocent human beings on the opposite side of the globe from its homeland since 1945.

Which one is it?

"IN CONCLUSION

"Instead of being decapitated and immolated by Daesh, thousands of inhabitants of Mosul were blown to pieces and incinerated by US-British bombs. UN International Organization for Migration’s recent report notes that, at its peak, nearly one million residents fled the city.

"By now, 350,000 or so remain 'internally displaced persons' (IDPs). 'Many IDPs are unable to return because their houses have been destroyed, either by [Daesh] or during the battle, and renting or buying new property is prohibitively expensive.'

"They are some of the millions of refugees generated by the US-British imperial war machine. Mosul is a small part of a much larger tragedy: one of US global hegemony in the age of Full Spectrum Dominance."

Life Among the Rubble: Mosul 18 Months after “Liberation”

yes--sadddam would've got power with or without the CIA
please get out of Unreality World

 

[longknife]

It must be a slow news day when the anti-America trolls come out to play.