The Truth About Project 2025 | The Culture War with Tim Pool

[Marener]

youre talking in circles,,

It’s the same question i always asked that you avoided. Who claimed Obama had immunity?

 

[Rawley]

if the dad doesnt pay for the child hes punished,,

Not by the federal Gvt.

but if the mother doesnt pay for the child the government takes from others and gives it to the mother,,

that doesnt sound like a good system to me,,

better than kids going hungry or sick. They should not be punished because their parents are fuckups.

 

[progressive hunter]

It’s the same question i always asked that you avoided. Who claimed Obama had immunity?

the act proved it,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Not by the federal Gvt.

better than kids going hungry or sick. They should not be punished because their parents are fuckups.

how is putting the father on jail or suspending the fathers DL helping the kid,,

and why doesnt the mother go to jail when she cant pay??

its a horrible system thats cause millions of children to suffer,,

 

[Lesh]

Tim Pool is incredibly dishonest. They do indeed want to wipe large swaths of civil servants and put in their own loyalists.

Thats the purpose of the Schedule F order.

Which Trump enacted in the waning days of his term only to have Biden rescind it… nasty dictator that he is

 

[Marener]

the act proved it,,

Only if we were to accept your belief it was “clearly illegal”, which is just your opinion.

 

[22lcidw]

Obama never claimed he had criminal immunity and spent a lot of time making sure his actions were legal within the bounds of his duties as commander in chief executing a war abroad that was authorized by Congress which does include a military attack on an American citizen who was participating in the war on the side of the enemy.

No one prosecuted him for it because no one thought it was illegal. Not because they didn’t think they couldn’t.

Show me where anyone claimed that Obama or Bush couldn’t be prosecuted.

Obama was insulated with many layers of safety nets. From the Prog controlled media/entertainers/prog elites/prog corporate entities/prog politicians/DEI/affirmative action/quotas/political correctness/public school education/college education/employment rules/agricultural titans/energy titans/industrial titans/tech titans/ financial titans/economic titans'/royalty/private banker owners of fiat currencies of many nations/a percentage of citizens who were brainwashed by the Prog propaganda and more. It's tough to have any other ideas when this is going on 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Much of it goes against human common sense.

 

[progressive hunter]

Only if we were to accept your belief it was “clearly illegal”, which is just your opinion.

so youre saying its legal for a POTUS to have an american killed without due process??

 

[Marener]

so youre saying its legal for a POTUS to have an american killed without due process??

Who said it’s illegal?

 

[progressive hunter]

Which Trump enacted in the waning days of his term only to have Biden rescind it… nasty dictator that he is

yes biden is a nasty dictator,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Who said it’s illegal?

the constitution,,

you do know what that is dont you??

 

[Marener]

the constitution,,

you do know what that is dont you??

WHO said that what Obama did was illegal?

Read the question before you respond.

 

[Lesh]

yes biden is a nasty dictator,,

Really? Then why would he rescind an order that would let him fire anyone he deemed disloyal to him?

 

[progressive hunter]

WHO said that what Obama did was illegal?

Read the question before you respond.

the constitution says its illegal,,

and you trying to deflect shows you know POTUS has immunity,,

 

[BackAgain]

Project 2025 is a document and we read it.

Alas. You don’t UNDERSTAND it. (And really, that’s the most important point.)

So we know exactly what it is.

No. You don’t.

We don’t need to listen to political hacks trying to walk it back.

YOU could USE some assistance even though your ignorance caused your confusion.

They wrote it all down for us.

Again: “reading” a document doesn’t imply that you comprehend what you read.

 

[Mac1958]

you prove that daily,,

Here we go again...

 

[progressive hunter]

Here we go again...

you just cant help but make a fool of yourself can you,,

 

[Marener]

the constitution says its illegal,,

and you trying to deflect shows you know POTUS has immunity,,

Do you not understand that I’m asking for a person and not for your interpretation of the constitution. Thats what WHO means.

WHO said that what Obama did was illegal?

 

[Marener]

Alas. You don’t UNDERSTAND it. (And really, that’s the most important point.)

No. You don’t.

YOU could USE some assistance even though your ignorance caused your confusion.

Again: “reading” a document doesn’t imply that you comprehend what you read.

Deny. Deny. Deny.

 

[progressive hunter]

Do you not understand that I’m asking for a person and not for your interpretation of the constitution. Thats what WHO means.

WHO said that what Obama did was illegal?

we are a nation of laws not people,,

and the law/constitution is clear the government cant murder someone without due process