Missourian
Diamond Member
You would never be able to read his tax returns anyway, and neither would 99.99999999% of the public, even if he did release them, so I don't blame him for not releasing them. As an example, just try to get a handle on just one company, a publicly traded one, via its 10K filing, and tell us how much Apple is loopholing and how much it should be be paying in taxes, then go search the Federal IRS database on 'private rulings' and account for those as well. If you can do all that, then you can claim you might know something about it, that is if you personally filled out and audited his returns yourself. Otherwise his returns, as are the vast majority of corporate returns, might as well be written in some cryptographic code for all the enlightenment they will provide.
Document
... from the SEC's EDGAR system. And if you're really good, then have a go at General Electric's ...
Good post.
![thup :thup: :thup:](/styles/smilies/thup.gif)
The whole point was to cherry pick some data that would make for excellent liberal talking points. Conversely, not releasing the return made for it's own talking point, which Nat is making use of here.
Nothing but political theater.