U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

[bodecea]

Pretty funny, Comrade.

 

[Alex.]

 

[emilynghiem]

Fake news deserves a fake news response:

Unnamed officials familiar with the Trump transition team, who spoke on the conditions of anonymity, have denied this story.​

So you're making stuff up now?

Unnamed officials familiar with the classified report, have doubts. that's all I can say. Why don't you believe these unnamed sources? they are familiar with the report!

Soooo you believe "unnamed officials"

Well I have it from my sources, high up in some unnamed organization, and these people are clearly unnamed sources, that in fact the Russians are aliens and it was the aliens who done it. There, must be true, as it came from unnamed sources that are MORE unnamed than your unnamed sources.

That is why this story, who cite UNNAMED SOURCES!!!!!! is FAKE NEWS.

Good for you. You're catching on.

Not necessarily. Sometimes sources have to be unnamed in order to protect the person who doesn't want to be identified for a variety of reasons.

The point here is that you have to look at things and make judgements.

You can decided that an unnamed source is true. You can decided it's fake. You can decide to sit on the fence.

Dear frigidweirdo
But the people who were the original sources of the emails, we know by NAME!
Why isn't the focus there but on arguing about people who aren't named and CAN'T be verified!

Isn't that part of the deflection game?

Is that the strategy of liberal politics?
Argue about GLOBAL WARMING which brings up such conflicts this distracts from
REAL environmental protections and restoration. It all relies on a power struggle in the media.

And DOESN'T focus on CLEANING UP ACTUAL DAMAGES AND DESTRUCTION
TO ENVIRONMENT AND ENDANGERED WILDLIFE.

Because THOSE effects could be proven to be either getting worse or improving.

So is the strategy to pick some angle that CAN'T be proven
but is based on BULLYING one side's BELIEFS over those who believe differently?

So there is no way to prove anyone right or wrong,
so people can play this control game indefinitely?

Is that the game here? To just exploit issues in the media as "political fodder" for
"political points" instead of focusing on real sources of problems and solutions?

 

[westwall]

So, by making such a jibe as yours, does this mean it wasn't Russia?

You're a anti-government traitor.

But a pro USA patriot. See how that works.

If you're OK with Russia interfering in our election, but don't care because it was your candidate that won, you are far from patriotic and a pig.

How did they interfere? By exposing the corrupt Democrat Party for the despicable swine they were? There was no hacking of voting machines so you're just pissed off that the shrilary was exposed as a scumbag. What does that make you?

 

[Lewdog]

U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

In some cases, one official said, the material followed what was called “a circuitous route” from the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, to WikiLeaks in an apparent attempt to make the origins of the material harder to trace, a common practice used by all intelligence agencies, including U.S. ones.

These handoffs, the officials said, enabled WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to say the Russian government or state agencies were not the source of the material published on his website.


U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

Time for Trump to wake up and stop playing the dog and pony show.

Matthew
And how does any of this change the fact
where the SOURCE of the ORIGINAL CONTENT of the leaked emails came from?

Had anyone ALTERED the content, you might have an argument this manipulated the
election campaign beyond the fault of the people exposed.

Why is all the focus on the source of the leak
and not on the SOURCE OF THE CONTENT!!!

Or the fact that the Reuters story above says that BY OCTOBER -- it became clear to (apparently US Intel) -- but the FBI INFORMED the DNC that they were being probed almost SIX MONTHS before that !!!!!

It's awfully hard to recreate a chain of custody for the purloined data if the crime happened that long ago. Unless -- we've got wires into every nook and cranny of Russia and can play back 4 or 7 month old intel intercepts.

That's just it... CrowdStrike said they were called and started tracking the malware for months to see where it was sending the data. They knew it was there and didn't stop it, just so they could track it. They worked to get more information and not just jump the gun.

 

[frigidweirdo]

So you're making stuff up now?

Unnamed officials familiar with the classified report, have doubts. that's all I can say. Why don't you believe these unnamed sources? they are familiar with the report!

Soooo you believe "unnamed officials"

Well I have it from my sources, high up in some unnamed organization, and these people are clearly unnamed sources, that in fact the Russians are aliens and it was the aliens who done it. There, must be true, as it came from unnamed sources that are MORE unnamed than your unnamed sources.

That is why this story, who cite UNNAMED SOURCES!!!!!! is FAKE NEWS.

Good for you. You're catching on.

Not necessarily. Sometimes sources have to be unnamed in order to protect the person who doesn't want to be identified for a variety of reasons.

The point here is that you have to look at things and make judgements.

You can decided that an unnamed source is true. You can decided it's fake. You can decide to sit on the fence.

Dear frigidweirdo
But the people who were the original sources of the emails, we know by NAME!
Why isn't the focus there but on arguing about people who aren't named and CAN'T be verified!

Isn't that part of the deflection game?

Is that the strategy of liberal politics?
Argue about GLOBAL WARMING which brings up such conflicts this distracts.
And don't focus on CLEANING UP ACTUAL DAMAGES AND DESTRUCTION
TO ENVIRONMENT AND ENDANGERED WILDLIFE.

Because THOSE effects could be proven to be either getting worse or improving.

So is the strategy to pick some angle that CAN'T be proven
but is based on BULLYING one side's BELIEFS over those who believe differently?
So there is no way to prove anyone right or wrong,
so people can play this control game indefinitely?

Because there's a big difference between a foreign power interfering in the election process of the USA and some info that has come up but doesn't seem to mean much.

Deflection? Surely people who want to ignore interference in elections simply because their candidate won are deflecting.

The biggest problem, and the one that doesn't get spoken about much, is that there are two parties who control everything and everything is about their little games. The system needs to change otherwise the US is going to go downhill quicker than ever.

 

[Alex.]

So you're making stuff up now?

Unnamed officials familiar with the classified report, have doubts. that's all I can say. Why don't you believe these unnamed sources? they are familiar with the report!

Soooo you believe "unnamed officials"

Well I have it from my sources, high up in some unnamed organization, and these people are clearly unnamed sources, that in fact the Russians are aliens and it was the aliens who done it. There, must be true, as it came from unnamed sources that are MORE unnamed than your unnamed sources.

That is why this story, who cite UNNAMED SOURCES!!!!!! is FAKE NEWS.

Good for you. You're catching on.

Not necessarily. Sometimes sources have to be unnamed in order to protect the person who doesn't want to be identified for a variety of reasons.

The point here is that you have to look at things and make judgements.

You can decided that an unnamed source is true. You can decided it's fake. You can decide to sit on the fence.

Dear frigidweirdo
But the people who were the original sources of the emails, we know by NAME!
Why isn't the focus there but on arguing about people who aren't named and CAN'T be verified!

Isn't that part of the deflection game?

Is that the strategy of liberal politics?
Argue about GLOBAL WARMING which brings up such conflicts this distracts from
REAL environmental protections and restoration. It all relies on a power struggle in the media.

And DOESN'T focus on CLEANING UP ACTUAL DAMAGES AND DESTRUCTION
TO ENVIRONMENT AND ENDANGERED WILDLIFE.

Because THOSE effects could be proven to be either getting worse or improving.

So is the strategy to pick some angle that CAN'T be proven
but is based on BULLYING one side's BELIEFS over those who believe differently?

So there is no way to prove anyone right or wrong,
so people can play this control game indefinitely?

Is that the game here? To just exploit issues in the media as "political fodder" for
"political points" instead of focusing on real sources of problems and solutions?

Why cite facts to Weirdo he does not pay attention to those things.

 

[BULLDOG]

So, by making such a jibe as yours, does this mean it wasn't Russia?

You're a anti-government traitor.

But a pro USA patriot. See how that works.

If you're OK with Russia interfering in our election, but don't care because it was your candidate that won, you are far from patriotic and a pig.

How did they interfere? By exposing the corrupt Democrat Party for the despicable swine they were? There was no hacking of voting machines so you're just pissed off that the shrilary was exposed as a scumbag. What does that make you?

The right was thrilled with every bit of information that was released. Are you going to try to pretend that information had no effect on the election? If so, you're either stupid, or want to be seen as stupid.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Unnamed officials familiar with the classified report, have doubts. that's all I can say. Why don't you believe these unnamed sources? they are familiar with the report!

Soooo you believe "unnamed officials"

Well I have it from my sources, high up in some unnamed organization, and these people are clearly unnamed sources, that in fact the Russians are aliens and it was the aliens who done it. There, must be true, as it came from unnamed sources that are MORE unnamed than your unnamed sources.

That is why this story, who cite UNNAMED SOURCES!!!!!! is FAKE NEWS.

Good for you. You're catching on.

Not necessarily. Sometimes sources have to be unnamed in order to protect the person who doesn't want to be identified for a variety of reasons.

The point here is that you have to look at things and make judgements.

You can decided that an unnamed source is true. You can decided it's fake. You can decide to sit on the fence.

Dear frigidweirdo
But the people who were the original sources of the emails, we know by NAME!
Why isn't the focus there but on arguing about people who aren't named and CAN'T be verified!

Isn't that part of the deflection game?

Is that the strategy of liberal politics?
Argue about GLOBAL WARMING which brings up such conflicts this distracts from
REAL environmental protections and restoration. It all relies on a power struggle in the media.

And DOESN'T focus on CLEANING UP ACTUAL DAMAGES AND DESTRUCTION
TO ENVIRONMENT AND ENDANGERED WILDLIFE.

Because THOSE effects could be proven to be either getting worse or improving.

So is the strategy to pick some angle that CAN'T be proven
but is based on BULLYING one side's BELIEFS over those who believe differently?

So there is no way to prove anyone right or wrong,
so people can play this control game indefinitely?

Is that the game here? To just exploit issues in the media as "political fodder" for
"political points" instead of focusing on real sources of problems and solutions?

Why cite facts to Weirdo he does not pay attention to those things.

Oh, you think you know me huh?

 

[Lewdog]

You're a anti-government traitor.

But a pro USA patriot. See how that works.

If you're OK with Russia interfering in our election, but don't care because it was your candidate that won, you are far from patriotic and a pig.

How did they interfere? By exposing the corrupt Democrat Party for the despicable swine they were? There was no hacking of voting machines so you're just pissed off that the shrilary was exposed as a scumbag. What does that make you?

The right was thrilled with every bit of information that was released. Are you going to try to pretend that information had no effect on the election? If so, you're either stupid, or want to be seen as stupid.

Trump supporters couldn't get enough of the shit when it was happening, but now the stuff didn't make a difference.

 

[Eloy]

U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

In some cases, one official said, the material followed what was called “a circuitous route” from the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, to WikiLeaks in an apparent attempt to make the origins of the material harder to trace, a common practice used by all intelligence agencies, including U.S. ones.

These handoffs, the officials said, enabled WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to say the Russian government or state agencies were not the source of the material published on his website.


U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

Time for Trump to wake up and stop playing the dog and pony show.

Donald Trump and his supporters do not want to admit that the Russian government sabotaged Hillary Clinton's campaign because doing so delegitimizes Trump's presidency before it has even begun.

 

[Zander]

The Poor LWNJ's.....they wish the emails weren't true.......

They want us to forget the content of the emails.

 

[westwall]

You're a anti-government traitor.

But a pro USA patriot. See how that works.

If you're OK with Russia interfering in our election, but don't care because it was your candidate that won, you are far from patriotic and a pig.

How did they interfere? By exposing the corrupt Democrat Party for the despicable swine they were? There was no hacking of voting machines so you're just pissed off that the shrilary was exposed as a scumbag. What does that make you?

The right was thrilled with every bit of information that was released. Are you going to try to pretend that information had no effect on the election? If so, you're either stupid, or want to be seen as stupid.

Why don't you take it up with your candidate who was so fucking arrogant and stupid that she decided to use an unsecured server so she could avoid the FOIA laws of this country. Take it up with a aid of hers who was so stupid that he fell for a phishing scheme that my 10 year old daughter wouldn't fall for. The one thing that the release of the emails showed was that she was even less qualified to lead this country than the trumpster was.

 

[Alex.]

Soooo you believe "unnamed officials"

Well I have it from my sources, high up in some unnamed organization, and these people are clearly unnamed sources, that in fact the Russians are aliens and it was the aliens who done it. There, must be true, as it came from unnamed sources that are MORE unnamed than your unnamed sources.

That is why this story, who cite UNNAMED SOURCES!!!!!! is FAKE NEWS.

Good for you. You're catching on.

Not necessarily. Sometimes sources have to be unnamed in order to protect the person who doesn't want to be identified for a variety of reasons.

The point here is that you have to look at things and make judgements.

You can decided that an unnamed source is true. You can decided it's fake. You can decide to sit on the fence.

Dear frigidweirdo
But the people who were the original sources of the emails, we know by NAME!
Why isn't the focus there but on arguing about people who aren't named and CAN'T be verified!

Isn't that part of the deflection game?

Is that the strategy of liberal politics?
Argue about GLOBAL WARMING which brings up such conflicts this distracts from
REAL environmental protections and restoration. It all relies on a power struggle in the media.

And DOESN'T focus on CLEANING UP ACTUAL DAMAGES AND DESTRUCTION
TO ENVIRONMENT AND ENDANGERED WILDLIFE.

Because THOSE effects could be proven to be either getting worse or improving.

So is the strategy to pick some angle that CAN'T be proven
but is based on BULLYING one side's BELIEFS over those who believe differently?

So there is no way to prove anyone right or wrong,
so people can play this control game indefinitely?

Is that the game here? To just exploit issues in the media as "political fodder" for
"political points" instead of focusing on real sources of problems and solutions?

Why cite facts to Weirdo he does not pay attention to those things.

Oh, you think you know me huh?

Know you? You want a date doofus?

What I know is your type: a sniveling sycophant who will give everyone's freedoms and assets away in an effort to make himself feel superior over those who actually contribute to society.

 

[flacaltenn]

U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

In some cases, one official said, the material followed what was called “a circuitous route” from the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, to WikiLeaks in an apparent attempt to make the origins of the material harder to trace, a common practice used by all intelligence agencies, including U.S. ones.

These handoffs, the officials said, enabled WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to say the Russian government or state agencies were not the source of the material published on his website.


U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

Time for Trump to wake up and stop playing the dog and pony show.

Matthew
And how does any of this change the fact
where the SOURCE of the ORIGINAL CONTENT of the leaked emails came from?

Had anyone ALTERED the content, you might have an argument this manipulated the
election campaign beyond the fault of the people exposed.

Why is all the focus on the source of the leak
and not on the SOURCE OF THE CONTENT!!!

Or the fact that the Reuters story above says that BY OCTOBER -- it became clear to (apparently US Intel) -- but the FBI INFORMED the DNC that they were being probed almost SIX MONTHS before that !!!!!

It's awfully hard to recreate a chain of custody for the purloined data if the crime happened that long ago. Unless -- we've got wires into every nook and cranny of Russia and can play back 4 or 7 month old intel intercepts.

You're grabbing at straws there junior.

The hell I am. How do you reconstruct a "circuitous route" of custody from the GRU to Wikileaks 6 months AFTER the deeds? If congresscritters were SMART enough to ask that question (or the Giant Cheeto) , this little charade would be over by now..

Now if they assigned ASSETS to follow this trail back THEN -- why did the US not take measures to stop the release. There was a last minute effort to shut Assange up about 2 weeks before the election, but prior to that -- NOTHING..

And that conflicts with the initial assessment by the private agency that worked with FBI. Which laid the finger on CozyBear and FancyBear OUTSIDE the GRU as the most likely suspects.

 

[skye]

Boogie , Russians ,Sunshine LOL

 

[BULLDOG]

You're a anti-government traitor.

But a pro USA patriot. See how that works.

If you're OK with Russia interfering in our election, but don't care because it was your candidate that won, you are far from patriotic and a pig.

How did they interfere? By exposing the corrupt Democrat Party for the despicable swine they were? There was no hacking of voting machines so you're just pissed off that the shrilary was exposed as a scumbag. What does that make you?

The right was thrilled with every bit of information that was released. Are you going to try to pretend that information had no effect on the election? If so, you're either stupid, or want to be seen as stupid.

Why don't you take it up with your candidate who was so fucking arrogant and stupid that she decided to use an unsecured server so she could avoid the FOIA laws of this country. Take it up with a aid of hers who was so stupid that he fell for a phishing scheme that my 10 year old daughter wouldn't fall for. The one thing that the release of the emails showed was that she was even less qualified to lead this country than the trumpster was.

You're floundering there kid. We're talking about Russia interfering in our elections, and your willingness to ignore that because your orange clown won. Why are you running from the subject of our conversation? Coward?

 

[Lewdog]

You're a anti-government traitor.

But a pro USA patriot. See how that works.

If you're OK with Russia interfering in our election, but don't care because it was your candidate that won, you are far from patriotic and a pig.

How did they interfere? By exposing the corrupt Democrat Party for the despicable swine they were? There was no hacking of voting machines so you're just pissed off that the shrilary was exposed as a scumbag. What does that make you?

The right was thrilled with every bit of information that was released. Are you going to try to pretend that information had no effect on the election? If so, you're either stupid, or want to be seen as stupid.

Why don't you take it up with your candidate who was so fucking arrogant and stupid that she decided to use an unsecured server so she could avoid the FOIA laws of this country. Take it up with a aid of hers who was so stupid that he fell for a phishing scheme that my 10 year old daughter wouldn't fall for. The one thing that the release of the emails showed was that she was even less qualified to lead this country than the trumpster was.

I don't like what Clinton did one bit... but by your reasoning, you would blame a woman for getting raped because she was walking alone late at night. I'm sorry, but that's not how the world works.

 

[flacaltenn]

U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

In some cases, one official said, the material followed what was called “a circuitous route” from the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, to WikiLeaks in an apparent attempt to make the origins of the material harder to trace, a common practice used by all intelligence agencies, including U.S. ones.

These handoffs, the officials said, enabled WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to say the Russian government or state agencies were not the source of the material published on his website.


U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

Time for Trump to wake up and stop playing the dog and pony show.

Matthew
And how does any of this change the fact
where the SOURCE of the ORIGINAL CONTENT of the leaked emails came from?

Had anyone ALTERED the content, you might have an argument this manipulated the
election campaign beyond the fault of the people exposed.

Why is all the focus on the source of the leak
and not on the SOURCE OF THE CONTENT!!!

Or the fact that the Reuters story above says that BY OCTOBER -- it became clear to (apparently US Intel) -- but the FBI INFORMED the DNC that they were being probed almost SIX MONTHS before that !!!!!

It's awfully hard to recreate a chain of custody for the purloined data if the crime happened that long ago. Unless -- we've got wires into every nook and cranny of Russia and can play back 4 or 7 month old intel intercepts.

That's just it... CrowdStrike said they were called and started tracking the malware for months to see where it was sending the data. They knew it was there and didn't stop it, just so they could track it. They worked to get more information and not just jump the gun.

CrowdStrike was the group who said it DID not originate in the GRU.. Maybe those 2 bears were outside contractors.. But NO Intel Agency is gonna burn it's valuable sources and methods. And if Cozy and Fancy's fingerprints were the ones on it -- the GRU would NEVER compromise them as assets.

More likely Cozy and Fancy smells lots of Yankee Dollars for that information and found their OWN buyers.
Which would piss off the Russians like Snowden pissed off Clapper. Made a outright LIAR out of the clown didn't he?

 

[Lewdog]

U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

In some cases, one official said, the material followed what was called “a circuitous route” from the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, to WikiLeaks in an apparent attempt to make the origins of the material harder to trace, a common practice used by all intelligence agencies, including U.S. ones.

These handoffs, the officials said, enabled WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to say the Russian government or state agencies were not the source of the material published on his website.


U.S. intel report identifies Russians who gave emails to WikiLeaks -officials

Time for Trump to wake up and stop playing the dog and pony show.

Matthew
And how does any of this change the fact
where the SOURCE of the ORIGINAL CONTENT of the leaked emails came from?

Had anyone ALTERED the content, you might have an argument this manipulated the
election campaign beyond the fault of the people exposed.

Why is all the focus on the source of the leak
and not on the SOURCE OF THE CONTENT!!!

Or the fact that the Reuters story above says that BY OCTOBER -- it became clear to (apparently US Intel) -- but the FBI INFORMED the DNC that they were being probed almost SIX MONTHS before that !!!!!

It's awfully hard to recreate a chain of custody for the purloined data if the crime happened that long ago. Unless -- we've got wires into every nook and cranny of Russia and can play back 4 or 7 month old intel intercepts.

You're grabbing at straws there junior.

The hell I am. How do you reconstruct a "circuitous route" of custody from the GRU to Wikileaks 6 months AFTER the deeds? If congresscritters were SMART enough to ask that question (or the Giant Cheeto) , this little charade would be over by now..

Now if they assigned ASSETS to follow this trail back THEN -- why did the US not take measures to stop the release. There was a last minute effort to shut Assange up about 2 weeks before the election, but prior to that -- NOTHING..

And that conflicts with the initial assessment by the private agency that worked with FBI. Which laid the finger on CozyBear and FancyBear OUTSIDE the GRU as the most likely suspects.

How do you know they didn't track them at the time it happened? What did you expect them to do to stop it? Assassinate the delivery guy? Cause war during the election?