U.S. soon to recover all the jobs lost in the financial crisis

[Mr. H.]

Here's the only graphic that matters, Sal Pal.

 

[Kimura]

lol
Go ahead and try to sell that one

I think those millions out of work might laugh in your face

While Bush doubled the number of unemployed from 6 million to 12 million, they have been reduced under Obama to 9.7 million now.

yeah, in government jobs
how many for his insurance scam?
he can't create enough new government agencies fast enough for his liking

It doesn't matter whether it's private sector or public sector job creation. Cash registers don't discriminate.

 

[OnePercenter]

-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2013 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.

-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-off’s/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees.

-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2013 price structure.

-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years.

-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.

I really hope that's parody, because it would be very scary if you thought those were good ideas

Part of my posting was deleted so I'll re-post:

-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2013 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.

-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-off’s/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees.

-Companies with 300 employees or less, employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.

-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2013 price structure. Remove the FICA limit.

-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years.

-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.

There IS an inherent problem. Let's see if you are smart enough to find it.

 

[Rozman]

What a stupid fucking thread.

The economy requires 200,000 new jobs EACH MONTH just to keep up with the net increase in "working" population. 179,000 new jobs in May is not "job growth"; it is stagnation.

To say that we will shortly have as many jobs as we did before the economic implosion - many years ago - and to believe that that is good news...

Jesus. What an idjit.

How about this?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/07/u...pier.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes

 

[Vigilante]

What a stupid fucking thread.

The economy requires 200,000 new jobs EACH MONTH just to keep up with the net increase in "working" population. 179,000 new jobs in May is not "job growth"; it is stagnation.

To say that we will shortly have as many jobs as we did before the economic implosion - many years ago - and to believe that that is good news...

Jesus. What an idjit.

How about this?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/07/u...pier.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes

Never just give a liturd a link, they refuse to look at it since they know it BITCH SLAPS their position.... Put the link up with a PERTENANT small bit of info...they still won't look, but it does enhance your argument!...Such as..

Yes, the number of jobs on United States employers’ payrolls has risen back to its pre-recession levels. But in the six and a half years that have passed, the nation’s population has risen a good deal; the civilian noninstitutional population has risen since January 2008, to 247.4 million from 232.6 million. So we now have about the same number of jobs as we did then, but about 15 million more people who might wish to hold them.

See how easy that is to stick it to them!

 

[Rozman]

What a stupid fucking thread.

The economy requires 200,000 new jobs EACH MONTH just to keep up with the net increase in "working" population. 179,000 new jobs in May is not "job growth"; it is stagnation.

To say that we will shortly have as many jobs as we did before the economic implosion - many years ago - and to believe that that is good news...

Jesus. What an idjit.

How about this?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/07/u...pier.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes

Never just give a liturd a link, they refuse to look at it since they know it BITCH SLAPS their position.... Put the link up with a PERTENANT small bit of info...they still won't look, but it does enhance your argument!...Such as..

Yes, the number of jobs on United States employers’ payrolls has risen back to its pre-recession levels. But in the six and a half years that have passed, the nation’s population has risen a good deal; the civilian noninstitutional population has risen since January 2008, to 247.4 million from 232.6 million. So we now have about the same number of jobs as we did then, but about 15 million more people who might wish to hold them.

See how easy that is to stick it to them!

I put this up along with the link in an earlier post...I was lazy on this one...

Yes, the number of jobs on United States employers’ payrolls has risen back to its pre-recession levels. But in the six and a half years that have passed, the nation’s population has risen a good deal; the civilian noninstitutional population has risen since January 2008, to 247.4 million from 232.6 million. So we now have about the same number of jobs as we did then, but about 15 million more people who might wish to hold them.