U.S. Supreme Court Trump Ruling Today at 10 AM....Live feeds up.....Update: Reversed 9-0

[Nostra]

A political body deciding who can and cannot run for office?

That's just plain idiotic!

Kinda like a political body dominated by one party trying to remove a President of the other party from office?

 

[Missourian]

Spicy take...

 

[Nostra]

I for one welcome the ruling. Trump has the least chance of winning of any Biden opponent. Plus that part of the amendment is poorly written. Framers had no idea a sitting president would refuse to give up power but still be acceptable to a large enough group to run. The whole system is based on peaceful transition of power.

Face facts for once in your pathetic life, you got your ass handed to you……UNANIMOUSLY.

 

[Lastamender]

9-0

 

[Nostra]

Trump is making a fool out of the entire justice system!

Fortunately, Trump and his MAGA idiots will get slaughtered in the 2024 election.

Then the words 'Judicial reform' will have teeth.

Cry more.

 

[Nostra]

I see your point, but we are a Republic, not a pure Democracy. We are a nation of laws (or at least I thought we were).

SCOTUS should have done their job. This decision may be the key point in ending America.

Cry even more.

 

[progressive hunter]

Can you point to the section of the ruling where they said FPOTUS#45 didn't engage in insurrection?

Maybe I missed it.

WW

he was found not guilty in a trial,,

case closed,,

 

[Nostra]

I'm counting on 81+ million pissed off American voters that saw those MAGA idiots try to steal the 2020 election from us.

Additionally, reversing Roe v. Wade, not to mention Republicans against Trump, adds up to a huge Dem sweep.

But I think that we can all anticipate the MAGA idiots doing everything they can to disrupt and steal the 2024 election. That's the only hope they have.

Your tears are hilarious.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Can you point to the section of the ruling where they said FPOTUS#45 didn't engage in insurrection?

Maybe I missed it.

WW

The Law Suit wasn't about "insurrection" it was about CO's attempt to remove a candidate from the ballot. They can't do it. It's a Rump win in that SCOTUS says CO can't interfere in the Election.

 

[Nostra]

State courts & SoS's decide all the time.

This is the first that SCOTUS has been asked for a ruling...

THEY FAILED!

Poor baby.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Interesting.

I don’t remember ever having an exchange with you. Not as “Harpy Eagle” anyway.

What other screen names might I know you by?

You are a bright boy, I am sure you can figure it out.

 

[Nostra]

You guys support the justice system when you get a result you like.

You say the system is rigged when you don’t.

Irony.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The Law Suit wasn't about "insurrection" it was about CO's attempt to remove a candidate from the ballot. They can't do it. It's a Rump win in that SCOTUS says CO can't interfere in the Election.

You know it was about CO's attempt to remove a candidate from the ballot for insurrection.

WW

 

[Nostra]

I'm sure all you trumptarded think it's a win when the Colorado Supreme Court is the actual loser.

Every state that tried to kick Trump off the ballot lost, Simp.

A unanimous Trump win,

 

[Rawley]

Why?

It has no real bearing on the ruling of the court today which was a procedural ruling on States disqualifying candidates for federal office without Congressional legislation on what procedure to follow.

WW

Because you were arguing that Congress had passed legislation finding Trump to be an insurrectionist. 100% applicable

 

[Nostra]

#1 So you admit a majority of both Chambers of Congress found that FPOTUS#45 engaged in insurrection.

#2 I'm not a leftist, I'm a never-Trumper right of center moderate. Tomorrow I'll be voting for Nikki as part of Super Tuesday.

WW

Not guilty.

 

[JustAGuy1]

In Major Blow To Democracy, Supreme Court Rules Voters Can Vote For Favorite Candidate

 

[JustAGuy1]

You know it was about CO's attempt to remove a candidate from the ballot for insurrection.

WW

Uhhhhh, I just said that.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Because you were arguing that Congress had passed legislation finding Trump to be an insurrectionist. 100% applicable

I never argued that Congress passed legislation finding Trump to be an insurrectionist.

I said two things:

• A majority of both chambers agreed that FPOTUS#45 engaged in insurrection as part of impeachment 2.0. This isn't saying legislation was passed as impeachment isn't legislation.
• That Congress called the J6 riot an "insurrectionist mob" when it passed Public Law 117-32. I never claimed that this law identified FPOTUS#45 as engaging in insurrection, but that the riot was insurrectionist.

So please comment on what I said and not what you claim I said and then argue against that.

WW

 

[citygator]

Face facts for once in your pathetic life, you got your ass handed to you……UNANIMOUSLY.

I dont live in any of those states. I dont have a single post on here saying that Trump shouldn’t be on the ballot. I have always said Trump on the ballot is about the best we can expect with a mediocre campaigner like Biden. Just Trump being on the ballot helps out the Dems.

The fact that you need to ascribe a view I dont have to me shows the weakness in your debate skills.

He is an insurrectionist though.