sure, imagine a culture a million years advanced of humansSpeculating out loud is good for the discussion too!
what would their purpose be in visiting us?
~S~
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sure, imagine a culture a million years advanced of humansSpeculating out loud is good for the discussion too!
Sure, we know they've had billions of years to evolve. Maybe there was intelligent life in 'our' universe a few billion years ago?sure, imagine a culture a million years advanced of humans
what would their purpose be in visiting us?
~S~
It would be interesting I think to have you evaluated maybe to determine how you are so convinced the rest of us are 'inventing in the mind'. What makes you so skeptical that what we think is so questionable?You're welcome to leave the discussion or debate at any time.
You don't understand what I said about inventing them in the mind.
Too bad you're not interested enough to find out what mental health professional say.
I can imagine curiosity being a trait of highly developed sentient beings. Even our dog and cat and bird and horses and wild animals can be curious and prompted to inspect things. Certainly us humans are curious about our origins, the prehistoric critters and beings who preceded us, want to learn about them.sure, imagine a culture a million years advanced of humans
what would their purpose be in visiting us?
~S~
You said you weren't going to debate anymore and i was looking forward to you leaving. Oh well?It would be interesting I think to have you evaluated maybe to determine how you are so convinced the rest of us are 'inventing in the mind'. What makes you so skeptical that what we think is so questionable?
Um. I wasn't and am not debating. I am having a conversation here. I was just curious at why you presumed that I or others are somehow mentally confused or messed up because we are curious and even speculative about visitations from other worlds.You said you weren't going to debate anymore and i was looking forward to you leaving. Oh well?
I'm not so convinced you're inventing something. You may have other reasons to believe. But I do know that mental health professionals have explanations for why people don't want to think we are alone.
If you're going to debate and discuss again, refer to my evidence I've presented in links. Don't just assume on account of your anger driving you.
Find somebody else. You nearly always burn your bridges with your extremist attitude.Um. I wasn't and am not debating. I am having a conversation here. I was just curious at why you presumed that I or others are somehow mentally confused or messed up because we are curious and even speculative about visitations from other worlds.
I debate things when there are presumed contradicting facts from which we can draw logical conclusions. I have conversations about interesting topics that logic and reason suggest as possibilities.
But hey, if I bother you and you want me to leave, you I believe you can mute me here? I suggest you do that.
Maybe to a highly advanced culture compared to us, studying us would be like us having opportunity to study live dinosaurs or 'cavemen
Why would be my Q.Would one of the believers present the best case for extraterrestrials or their spacecraft?
"Rare" is an interesting word to use for "never". Not one shred of evidence exists.If we are being visited, the technology to travel light years is in the same category as cloaking, and not inconceivably, teleportation. Such a civilization would be fully capable of visiting and interacting with us undetected. If they made a habit of it, it's likely that they would occasionally get busted. It would be rare - as it has been.
this just in>it's likely that they would occasionally get busted
I do take 2nd. hand, 3rd. hand, and 50th. hand information for what it's worth.
Nothing you've presented appears to be your own eye witness account of extraterrestrials.
If interest continues on this topic I might get around to presenting De Grasse Tyson's opinions. They're not in the affirmative.
That is not a scientific argument, in light of how little of the universe has been explored.The scientific argument for the non-existence of extraterrestrial life is that we have no evidence of it.
Other than myself here, I suspect few --- if any --- are prepared to hold themselves up to guaranteed minor ridicule and often repeated jibes for having a belief in ETs .And so to conclude this thread on a positive note: The pro side on extraterrestrials visiting earth are not showing much commitment and that's surprising!
Yes, I think that some fear ridicule. They come to realize that their pro beliefs have to be kept in pro circles. Evidence to the contrary makes some uncomfortable.Other than myself here, I suspect few --- if any --- are prepared to hold themselves up to guaranteed minor ridicule and often repeated jibes for having a belief in ETs .
No, science doesn't make any negative arguments.~~~~~~
The scientific argument for the non-existence of extraterrestrial life is that we have no evidence of it.
Those are science, as you carelessly started withYet, science (and particularly mathematics, physics and chemistry) shows a strong probability that it does exist.
Closing of one's mind to the evidence and possibility of extraterrestrial life is akin to the ancients denying that the earth is round.
] Yet, science
Because there is no good evidence.It would be interesting I think to have you evaluated maybe to determine how you are so convinced the rest of us are 'inventing in the mind'. What makes you so skeptical that what we think is so questionable?
At one time there was no 'good evidence' for many many MANY things that turned out to be realities. They became realities because of one or more open minds that believed in possibilities more than in what a person has actually experienced. Likewise many things once believed have been disproven by people with sufficient open minds, curiosity, and/or courage to test beliefs, theories, concepts.Because there is no good evidence.