Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,397
- 2,180
Soon more states will announce their new rates and those too will be below current ones.
The ACA will be shown to be a limited success, but a success none the less.
Despite the factual data to the contrary, this is your position?
OK....Sounds good.
Just remember, cheaper invariably translates to lower quality.
There will no doubt be some types of coverage available at very low rates. But the coverage will be minimal.
ACA's Bronze plan, the one most likely to be chosen by young healthy people and those on low budgets whose income falls just above any threshold for subsidy or those who get the subsidy and simply do not wish to pay for better coverage, still leaves the insured with 40% of the bill. The Silver plan gets it to 70% leaving the remainder in the lap of the insured.
If this is what you folks call a breakthrough in health insurance coverage, you are drinking the Kool-Aid.
More than half of individual market plans sold today have actuarial values below the bronze threshold.
Percentage Of Individual Policies, By Actuarial Value And Plan Type, 2010
![]()
Group plans, on the other hand, virtually never offer anything below bronze-level coverage.
Percentage Of Group Policies, By Actuarial Value And Plan Type, 2010
![]()
What the ACA will do is move that distribution of generosities for individual plans to look a little more like the distribution for group plans, though not quite all the way. I expect a graph like that for exchange plans in a few years would show a peak in the silver plan range, as those will probably be the most popular.
Yes I did. It's a similar question to "Why would you have fire insurance if your house is not on fire". It doesn't help you in any way unless you actually need it.
It is my understanding that this new Obamacare law makes purchasing insurance possible even if you are already sick (comparable to your house being on fire). I don't know how quickly one can do this though.
Open enrollment will initially be available from October 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014. After that, there open enrollment will only be available from October 15 through December 7 of each year. So if you choose not to purchase insurance, then you get sick, you will not just be able to go out and buy insurance. There will be a waiting period which could be over a full year, as the plans will not go into effect until Jan 1.
This brings me to another question; what happens if you have insurance through an employer and lose your job? Will you be able to purchase a private plan through the exchange immediately? I would assume that you would since you had insurance, but I don't know the answer to this. Greenbeard, a little help on this one please?
It'll work just like open enrollments for group plans work under HIPAA now. Even though you can generally only switch or join coverage during the annual open enrollment period, certain changes/life events trigger brief special open enrollment periods. So if you lose existing coverage (maybe you change jobs to one that doesn't offer health benefits) and need to transition to buying in the exchange, you'll have 60 days to buy a new plan.
But obviously getting sick, having a heart attack, getting hit by a bus, etc. don't count as qualifying events. So if you're trying to game the system by waiting for sickness or injury to buy coverage, you'll still have to wait for October to get coverage (and for January for that coverage to actually kick in). And all expenses incurred during that wait belong to you.
so we will still have folks using the ER as their doctor. I cant wait to see how many folks enroll in October. The Obama care supporters is in for a wake up call.