Unemployment rate drops to 3.8%

[Theowl32]

Hi you dumb illiterate, ignorant fucking racist.

What did the economy do AFTER Pelosi and the democrats won the HOUSE AND SENATE in 2007.

Go ahead you dumb illiterate fuck. Tell us. While a pathetic ignorant fuck like you giggles at that, please tell me...

Who signed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act which exempted credit default swaps from regulation you loser.

While you are ignoring the facts with that, tell us who rewrote the Community Reinvestment Act which put pressure on banks to lend to low income neighborhoods you pathetic fucking loser.

Now back to the Pelosi and the democrats taking over congress from 2007 to 2010. What did the economy do during that time you stupid ass demented ignorant ass.

Go ahead and tell us what the economy has done since republicans started winning congress back from 2010 till now you piece of shit.

Then keep telling us how your black messiah made the economy recover so I can laugh my rich ass off at your stupid pathetic hypocritical ass.

Moron

When one party takes a majority in congress, it doesnt have an immediate effect, especially when the opposing party holds the executive branch. Only after legislation takes affect, does any impact occur, and that requires the president signing off on legislation.

2nd, the CRA causing the mortgate meltdown is a myth: read the causes of mortgage crisis.

You have no fucking clue. Go ahead and tell us who rewrote the Community Reinvestment Act which put pressure on banks to lend to low income neighborhoods. You ignoring that means everything to me.

Who signed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act which exempted credit default swaps from regulation? Why did you ignore that? Go ahead and deny how that impacted the bubble.

I did not even bring up Dodd and Frank with Fannie and Freddie nor did I mention how the democrat congess ignored all 18 warnings of the bubble in 2008.

The economy took a dive 8 years after clinton signed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act. The housing bubble was created when the loser clinton rewrote the Community Reinvestment Act in 1995.

YOU ARE A BRAINWASHED MORON!

 

[koshergrl]

more bad news for our friends on the left

Payrolls rise by better than expected 223,000 in May, jobless rate drops to 3.8%

The U.S. economy continued to add jobs at a solid clip in May, with nonfarm payrolls up 223,000 while the unemployment rate was 3.8 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Economists had been expecting payroll growth of 188,000 and the jobless to hold steady at 3.9 percent.

The unemployment rate was last this low in April 2000.

The odd thing here is that 3 to 4 percent of the USA can not work for some reason. Thus to continue with economic expansion workers must be imported somehow

No, that is just..no. Go back to school.

Though probably your schooling is the issue to begin with.

Sorry kid not all people can work. The last time unemployment was very low the labor unions said to let Mexican workers in. There are plenty of handicapped either physical or mental everywhere.

Completely irrelevant to anything and everything.

 

[koshergrl]

Wth is this fucking crap lol..

Apparently obama's army is busy creating fake documentation to help move the commie takeover forward.

We need some pogroms only instead of targeting an ethnicity, like the commies do, we'll target commies.

 

[Kosh]

more bad news for our friends on the left

Payrolls rise by better than expected 223,000 in May, jobless rate drops to 3.8%

The U.S. economy continued to add jobs at a solid clip in May, with nonfarm payrolls up 223,000 while the unemployment rate was 3.8 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Economists had been expecting payroll growth of 188,000 and the jobless to hold steady at 3.9 percent.

The unemployment rate was last this low in April 2000.

How are fake numbers good for America?

You far left drones pushed them for Obama and thought that would get Hilary elected!

 

[KissMy]

Sorry kid not all people can work. The last time unemployment was very low the labor unions said to let Mexican workers in. There are plenty of handicapped either physical or mental everywhere.

Unemployment Rate is Fake as a measure of full employment or how many people are still unemployed. Trump has a long way to go to get to Clinton employment levels. UE is a Jobs direction indicator. Trump Leaked Employment Numbers EARLY!!!

 

[buckeye45_73]

more bad news for our friends on the left
the unemployment rate was 3.8 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Donnie Dirt Bag himself says that number is FAKE!
He says the real number is the "not in labor force" total which increased by 170,000 causing the LFPR to drop another .1%
Donnie Dirt Bag's unemployment percent is due to loss of available workers.

JAN. 11, 2017 press conference
TRUMP: There will be a major border tax on these companies that are leaving and getting away with murder. And if our politicians had what it takes, they would have done this years ago. And you’d have millions more workers right now in the United States that are — 96 million really wanting a job and they can’t get. You know that story. The real number — that’s the real number.

Wait you guys are now using that number? that's hilarious...you ignored it for Obama's entire term.

And you are now ignoring it for Donnie Dirt Bag. It is Tramp's OWN standard that HE established himself.

No we aren't, I'm not afraid of that number. you guys were afraid of it for 8 years.
Here it is per May
The ‘real’ unemployment rate reached a 17-year low. Here’s why that’s a big deal.

 

[Theowl32]

more bad news for our friends on the left

Payrolls rise by better than expected 223,000 in May, jobless rate drops to 3.8%

The U.S. economy continued to add jobs at a solid clip in May, with nonfarm payrolls up 223,000 while the unemployment rate was 3.8 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Economists had been expecting payroll growth of 188,000 and the jobless to hold steady at 3.9 percent.

The unemployment rate was last this low in April 2000.

The odd thing here is that 3 to 4 percent of the USA can not work for some reason. Thus to continue with economic expansion workers must be imported somehow

No, that is just..no. Go back to school.

Though probably your schooling is the issue to begin with.

Sorry kid not all people can work. The last time unemployment was very low the labor unions said to let Mexican workers in. There are plenty of handicapped either physical or mental everywhere.

Unemployment rate is Fake as a measure of full employment or how many people are still unemployed. Trump has a long way to go to get to Clinton employment levels.

You stupid ass butthurt brainwashed loser.

Hey loser. Who controlled the House and Senate for the last 6 years of clintons presidency, who did not have a cold war to be concerned about because of republicans and had the internet explode thanks to capitalism.

You stupid ass.

 

[Faun]

A guy lost his career and takes two part time jobs to get money coming in so Obozo counts that as two jobs created.

Nope that is a Limbaugh Lie! Only the job that they worked the most hours is counted as a job created.

/----/ Limbaugh lie? I never heard him say that. Here is my source: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Utter bullshit.

Here's the study your fake news article references by the collaboration of Lawrence F. Katz of Harvard and Alan B. Krueger of Princeton...

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lkatz/files/katz_krueger_cws_resubmit_clean.pdf

You see if you can find the bullshit claim that, "nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract," anywhere in there. I could not.

You can even forget the ignorance of idiotically trying to compare "temporary help agency workers, on-call workers, contract workers, and independent contractors or freelancers" with "part time workers".

 

[Faun]

A guy lost his career and takes two part time jobs to get money coming in so Obozo counts that as two jobs created.

Nope that is a Limbaugh Lie! Only the job that they worked the most hours is counted as a job created.

/----/ Limbaugh lie? I never heard him say that. Here is my source: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

"A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions."

The actual study says no such thing.

And the study is about temporary jobs, not part time jobs.

 

[Cellblock2429]

A guy lost his career and takes two part time jobs to get money coming in so Obozo counts that as two jobs created.

Nope that is a Limbaugh Lie! Only the job that they worked the most hours is counted as a job created.

/----/ Limbaugh lie? I never heard him say that. Here is my source: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Utter bullshit.

Here's the study your fake news article references by the collaboration of Lawrence F. Katz of Harvard and Alan B. Krueger of Princeton...

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lkatz/files/katz_krueger_cws_resubmit_clean.pdf

You see if you can find the bullshit claim that, "nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract," anywhere in there. I could not.

You can even forget the ignorance of idiotically trying to compare "temporary help agency workers, on-call workers, contract workers, and independent contractors or freelancers" with "part time workers".

/----/ From page 8: A striking implication of these estimates is that 95 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015 appears to have occurred in alternative work arrangements. Total employment according to the CPS increased by 9.0 million (6.4 percent) over the decade, from 140.4 million in February 2005 to 149.4 in November 2015.13 The increase in the share of workers in alternative work arrangements from 10.7 percent in 2005 to 15.8 percent in 2015 implies that the number of workers employed in alternative arrangement increased by 8.6 million (57.2 percent), from 15.0 million in February 2005 to 23.6 million in November 2015. Thus, these figures imply that employment in traditional jobs (standard employment arrangements) rose by only 0.4 million (0.4 percent) from 125.4 million in February 2005 to 125.8 million in November 2015.

 

[Rosy]

more bad news for our friends on the left

Payrolls rise by better than expected 223,000 in May, jobless rate drops to 3.8%

The U.S. economy continued to add jobs at a solid clip in May, with nonfarm payrolls up 223,000 while the unemployment rate was 3.8 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Economists had been expecting payroll growth of 188,000 and the jobless to hold steady at 3.9 percent.

The unemployment rate was last this low in April 2000.

The odd thing here is that 3 to 4 percent of the USA can not work for some reason. Thus to continue with economic expansion workers must be imported somehow

No, that is just..no. Go back to school.

Though probably your schooling is the issue to begin with.

Sorry kid not all people can work. The last time unemployment was very low the labor unions said to let Mexican workers in. There are plenty of handicapped either physical or mental everywhere.

Completely irrelevant to anything and everything.

Wrong kid, as if the unemployment rate is under 4 percent, the actual unemployment rate is zero percent since about 4 percent are unemployable. Thus for factory jobs to expand, workers must be imported.

Simple economics, but way over your head

 

[Cellblock2429]

A guy lost his career and takes two part time jobs to get money coming in so Obozo counts that as two jobs created.

Nope that is a Limbaugh Lie! Only the job that they worked the most hours is counted as a job created.

/----/ Limbaugh lie? I never heard him say that. Here is my source: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

"A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions."

The actual study says no such thing.

And the study is about temporary jobs, not part time jobs.

/----/ Page 8: A striking implication of these estimates is that 95 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015 appears to have occurred in alternative work arrangements. Total employment according to the CPS increased by 9.0 million (6.4 percent) over the decade, from 140.4 million in February 2005 to 149.4 in November 2015.13 The increase in the share of workers in alternative work arrangements from 10.7 percent in 2005 to 15.8 percent in 2015 implies that the number of workers employed in alternative arrangement increased by 8.6 million (57.2 percent), from 15.0 million in February 2005 to 23.6 million in November 2015. Thus, these figures imply that employment in traditional jobs (standard employment arrangements) rose by only 0.4 million (0.4 percent) from 125.4 million in February 2005 to 125.8 million in November 2015.

 

[Faun]

/----/ Limbaugh lie? I never heard him say that. Here is my source: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

I posted the REAL numbers directly from the source with a link to the BLS. Your link gave no link to the source of the fake numbers and did not even NAME the source of the numbers they fabricated.

I know you prefer a FACTLESS source that supports your lies rather than actual numbers directly from the BLS that tell the truth when the truth contradicts your lies.

There were 8,807,000 FT jobs created and 986,000 PT jobs for a total of 9,793,000 jobs. That means 89.9% of the nearly 10 million jobs created were FT.

Prove the numbers from the BLS wrong with real numbers from a named source.

Since you are probably too STUPID to figure out how to use the other link I provided, I am posting links to each type of job separately.

Full time jobs:
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Part time jobs:
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

/----/ The link was posted in #87. Geeeze your reading and comprehension skills are worse than I thought. Now show me what numbers were made up by Harvard and Princeton who are not known for being COnservative Trump supporters.
Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

Of course since YOU can't read, you project it on me.
Please post the exact quote from your link where they cite the SOURCE of their fake numbers. They obviously didn't come from the BLS!!! I've proven that!!!!!
They simply say "a new study" but give no source of the numbers the fake study used.

The study is not fake.

investing.com's spin on the study is what's fake.

Meant to deceive brain-dead rightards who are easily duped and will obediently spread the bullshit in their fake article.

 

[Cellblock2429]

more bad news for our friends on the left

Payrolls rise by better than expected 223,000 in May, jobless rate drops to 3.8%

The U.S. economy continued to add jobs at a solid clip in May, with nonfarm payrolls up 223,000 while the unemployment rate was 3.8 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday.

Economists had been expecting payroll growth of 188,000 and the jobless to hold steady at 3.9 percent.

The unemployment rate was last this low in April 2000.

The odd thing here is that 3 to 4 percent of the USA can not work for some reason. Thus to continue with economic expansion workers must be imported somehow

No, that is just..no. Go back to school.

Though probably your schooling is the issue to begin with.

Sorry kid not all people can work. The last time unemployment was very low the labor unions said to let Mexican workers in. There are plenty of handicapped either physical or mental everywhere.

Completely irrelevant to anything and everything.

Wrong kid, as if the unemployment rate is under 4 percent, the actual unemployment rate is zero percent since about 4 percent are unemployable. Thus for factory jobs to expand, workers must be imported.

Simple economics, but way over your head

/----/ Wrong Tinkerbell. The UE rate can fall below 4%. Your post about those who can not work are not included in the UE rate. : Unemployment is below 4% for the first time since 2000
Robert Frick, chief economist with Navy Federal Credit Union, believes unemployment will keep falling as businesses offer more attractive wages and benefits to entice Americans who have stopped looking for work.

"There's still hundreds of thousands of more people who will enter the workforce," he said. "I think we can get down to 3.5%."

Unemployment fell as low as 3.8% in April 2000, in the waning days of the technology boom. The last time it was lower than that was 1969.

 

[Rosy]

The odd thing here is that 3 to 4 percent of the USA can not work for some reason. Thus to continue with economic expansion workers must be imported somehow

No, that is just..no. Go back to school.

Though probably your schooling is the issue to begin with.

Sorry kid not all people can work. The last time unemployment was very low the labor unions said to let Mexican workers in. There are plenty of handicapped either physical or mental everywhere.

Completely irrelevant to anything and everything.

Wrong kid, as if the unemployment rate is under 4 percent, the actual unemployment rate is zero percent since about 4 percent are unemployable. Thus for factory jobs to expand, workers must be imported.

Simple economics, but way over your head

/----/ Wrong Tinkerbell. The UE rate can fall below 4%. Your post about those who can not work are not included in the UE rate. : Unemployment is below 4% for the first time since 2000
Robert Frick, chief economist with Navy Federal Credit Union, believes unemployment will keep falling as businesses offer more attractive wages and benefits to entice Americans who have stopped looking for work.

"There's still hundreds of thousands of more people who will enter the workforce," he said. "I think we can get down to 3.5%."

Unemployment fell as low as 3.8% in April 2000, in the waning days of the technology boom. The last time it was lower than that was 1969.

There is no way to define those who can not work, thus they are included in the unemployment stats.

 

[Faun]

Nope that is a Limbaugh Lie! Only the job that they worked the most hours is counted as a job created.

/----/ Limbaugh lie? I never heard him say that. Here is my source: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

"A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions."

The actual study says no such thing.

And the study is about temporary jobs, not part time jobs.

/----/ Page 8: A striking implication of these estimates is that 95 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015 appears to have occurred in alternative work arrangements. Total employment according to the CPS increased by 9.0 million (6.4 percent) over the decade, from 140.4 million in February 2005 to 149.4 in November 2015.13 The increase in the share of workers in alternative work arrangements from 10.7 percent in 2005 to 15.8 percent in 2015 implies that the number of workers employed in alternative arrangement increased by 8.6 million (57.2 percent), from 15.0 million in February 2005 to 23.6 million in November 2015. Thus, these figures imply that employment in traditional jobs (standard employment arrangements) rose by only 0.4 million (0.4 percent) from 125.4 million in February 2005 to 125.8 million in November 2015.

Holyfuckingshit!!

You're even more rightarded than you appeared earlier. I knew you couldn't find it because it's not in there. investing.com made it up. You'll note, the actual study says nothing about Obama towards that 95%.

Why...?

Because.....

Barrack Hussein Obama... Serving as the 44th president president from 2009 to 2017.

From the study ... A striking implication of these estimates is that 95 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015

Roughly 1/3 of that study was of the Bush years. You know, when Obama wasn't president. And only went until 2015, leaving out more than a year of Obama's presidency.

So yeah, if you saddle the numbers with Bush's pathetic performance on jobs (worst since Herbert Hoover) and you exclude about 15% of Obama's actual time in office, and you don't actually want to discuss part time workers (even though that's what's being discussed) than sure, an abject moron can idiotically claim, "A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions."

 

[Rosy]

/----/ Limbaugh lie? I never heard him say that. Here is my source: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

"A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions."

The actual study says no such thing.

And the study is about temporary jobs, not part time jobs.

/----/ Page 8: A striking implication of these estimates is that 95 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015 appears to have occurred in alternative work arrangements. Total employment according to the CPS increased by 9.0 million (6.4 percent) over the decade, from 140.4 million in February 2005 to 149.4 in November 2015.13 The increase in the share of workers in alternative work arrangements from 10.7 percent in 2005 to 15.8 percent in 2015 implies that the number of workers employed in alternative arrangement increased by 8.6 million (57.2 percent), from 15.0 million in February 2005 to 23.6 million in November 2015. Thus, these figures imply that employment in traditional jobs (standard employment arrangements) rose by only 0.4 million (0.4 percent) from 125.4 million in February 2005 to 125.8 million in November 2015.

Holyfuckingshit!!

You're even more rightarded than you appeared earlier. I knew you couldn't find it because it's not in there. investing.com made it up. You'll note, the actual study says nothing about Obama towards that 95%.

Why...?

Because.....

Barrack Hussein Obama... Serving as the 44th president president from 2009 to 2017.

From the study ... A striking implication of these estimates is that 95 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015

Roughly 1/3 of that study was of the Bush years. You know, when Obama wasn't president. And only went until 2015, leaving out more than a year of Obama's presidency.

So yeah, if you saddle the numbers with Bush's pathetic performance on jobs (worst since Herbert Hoover) and you exclude about 15% of Obama's actual time in office, and you don't actually want to discuss part time workers (even though that's what's being discussed) than sure, an abject moron can idiotically claim, "A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions."

Wrong kid, the only thing Obooba did was hand out 900 billion dollars in stimulus. Thus any appeared improvement was government sponsored, or communism. Trump is creating real jobs as companies expand

Yawning

 

[Kosh]

A guy lost his career and takes two part time jobs to get money coming in so Obozo counts that as two jobs created.

Nope that is a Limbaugh Lie! Only the job that they worked the most hours is counted as a job created.

/----/ Limbaugh lie? I never heard him say that. Here is my source: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Utter bullshit.

Here's the study your fake news article references by the collaboration of Lawrence F. Katz of Harvard and Alan B. Krueger of Princeton...

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lkatz/files/katz_krueger_cws_resubmit_clean.pdf

You see if you can find the bullshit claim that, "nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract," anywhere in there. I could not.

You can even forget the ignorance of idiotically trying to compare "temporary help agency workers, on-call workers, contract workers, and independent contractors or freelancers" with "part time workers".

So in other words you have nothing to refute facts, just the same old far left religious dogma that you peddled under Obama.

 

[Faun]

Hi you dumb illiterate, ignorant fucking racist.

What did the economy do AFTER Pelosi and the democrats won the HOUSE AND SENATE in 2007.

Go ahead you dumb illiterate fuck. Tell us. While a pathetic ignorant fuck like you giggles at that, please tell me...

Who signed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act which exempted credit default swaps from regulation you loser.

While you are ignoring the facts with that, tell us who rewrote the Community Reinvestment Act which put pressure on banks to lend to low income neighborhoods you pathetic fucking loser.

Now back to the Pelosi and the democrats taking over congress from 2007 to 2010. What did the economy do during that time you stupid ass demented ignorant ass.

Go ahead and tell us what the economy has done since republicans started winning congress back from 2010 till now you piece of shit.

Then keep telling us how your black messiah made the economy recover so I can laugh my rich ass off at your stupid pathetic hypocritical ass.

Moron

"What did the economy do AFTER Pelosi and the democrats won the HOUSE AND SENATE in 2007."

LOL

What did Pelosi and Congressional Democrats do "in 2007" to cause the crash?? You freaks are truly fucking nuts.

 

[Faun]

Well here are the REAL numbers from the BLS.

Full time jobs Jan 2009, 115,818,000 and Jan 2017, 124,625,000

Part time jobs Jan 2009, 26,377,000 and Jan 2017, 27,363,000.

Looks like about 85% of jobs created under Obama were FULL TIME!!!
Your source, Like ALL CON$ervoFascist sources, are LIARS!!!

Table A-9. Selected employment indicators

/----/ I understand that reading comprehension for Public School educated Libtards is not a priority but the link clearly shows the report is from Harvard and Princeton University. Investing.com merely reported it. Please don't be sad and run off to your safe place. Next time you'll know better. Now ask Mommy for a cookie.
Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

"A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions."

The actual study says no such thing.

And the study is about temporary jobs, not part time jobs.

/----/ Page 8: A striking implication of these estimates is that 95 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015 appears to have occurred in alternative work arrangements. Total employment according to the CPS increased by 9.0 million (6.4 percent) over the decade, from 140.4 million in February 2005 to 149.4 in November 2015.13 The increase in the share of workers in alternative work arrangements from 10.7 percent in 2005 to 15.8 percent in 2015 implies that the number of workers employed in alternative arrangement increased by 8.6 million (57.2 percent), from 15.0 million in February 2005 to 23.6 million in November 2015. Thus, these figures imply that employment in traditional jobs (standard employment arrangements) rose by only 0.4 million (0.4 percent) from 125.4 million in February 2005 to 125.8 million in November 2015.

Holyfuckingshit!!

You're even more rightarded than you appeared earlier. I knew you couldn't find it because it's not in there. investing.com made it up. You'll note, the actual study says nothing about Obama towards that 95%.

Why...?

Because.....

Barrack Hussein Obama... Serving as the 44th president president from 2009 to 2017.

From the study ... A striking implication of these estimates is that 95 percent of the net employment growth in the U.S. economy from 2005 to 2015

Roughly 1/3 of that study was of the Bush years. You know, when Obama wasn't president. And only went until 2015, leaving out more than a year of Obama's presidency.

So yeah, if you saddle the numbers with Bush's pathetic performance on jobs (worst since Herbert Hoover) and you exclude about 15% of Obama's actual time in office, and you don't actually want to discuss part time workers (even though that's what's being discussed) than sure, an abject moron can idiotically claim, "A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions."

Wrong kid, the only thing Obooba did was hand out 900 billion dollars in stimulus. Thus any appeared improvement was government sponsored, or communism. Trump is creating real jobs as companies expand

Yawning

LOLOL

Wrong? Moi?

The study was from 2005-2015.

Obama was president from 2009-2017.

On which of those am I wrong?