Union Twitter Account Goes Rogue After President Speaks at RNC

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Nov 2, 2017
16,229
9,301
While the Teamster's leader is hanging out with the MAGA elite, his union is less than pleased with his speech.




O’Brien’s turn at the RNC was not appreciated by everyone at the Teamsters. The union’s official Twitter account bashed him on Tuesday after he shared a piece about his speech by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.). The piece, titled “The Promise of Pro-Labor Conservatism,” begins by suggesting that American workers are getting screwed because companies are using profits to “push diversity, equity, and inclusion and the religion of the trans flag.”

“Unions gain nothing from endorsing the racist, misogynistic, and anti-trans politics of the far right, no matter how much people like Sen. Hawley attempt to tether such bigotry to a cynical pro-labor message,” the Teamsters account wrote on X, adding: “You don’t unite a diverse working class by scoffing at its diversity.”

The Teamsters’ X account also shared a post from The Nation which said, “Despite Sean O’Brien’s support for Trump at the RNC, let’s be clear: A second Trump term would not be a win for the labor movement.” The account separately shared an X post asking: “Did anyone ask Sean O’Brien if he read the part in Project 2025 about Republicans wanting to end overtime pay? Do his union members know about this?” (Project 2025 is conservative groups’ controversial policy agenda for a second Trump term.)
O’Brien wants to have it both ways, but the labor movement is skeptical, as is his own union — as evinced not only by the rogue post on X, but what its vice president at large, John Palmer, wrote last week ahead of O’Brien’s appearance at the RNC: “It is unconscionable for any Labor leader to lend an air of legitimacy to a candidate and a political party, neither of which can be said to have done, or can be expected to do, anything to improve the lives of the workers we are pledged to represent.”
 
While the Teamster's leader is hanging out with the MAGA elite, his union is less than pleased with his speech.




O’Brien’s turn at the RNC was not appreciated by everyone at the Teamsters. The union’s official Twitter account bashed him on Tuesday after he shared a piece about his speech by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.). The piece, titled “The Promise of Pro-Labor Conservatism,” begins by suggesting that American workers are getting screwed because companies are using profits to “push diversity, equity, and inclusion and the religion of the trans flag.”

“Unions gain nothing from endorsing the racist, misogynistic, and anti-trans politics of the far right, no matter how much people like Sen. Hawley attempt to tether such bigotry to a cynical pro-labor message,” the Teamsters account wrote on X, adding: “You don’t unite a diverse working class by scoffing at its diversity.”


The Teamsters’ X account also shared a post from The Nation which said, “Despite Sean O’Brien’s support for Trump at the RNC, let’s be clear: A second Trump term would not be a win for the labor movement.” The account separately shared an X post asking: “Did anyone ask Sean O’Brien if he read the part in Project 2025 about Republicans wanting to end overtime pay? Do his union members know about this?” (Project 2025 is conservative groups’ controversial policy agenda for a second Trump term.)
O’Brien wants to have it both ways, but the labor movement is skeptical, as is his own union — as evinced not only by the rogue post on X, but what its vice president at large, John Palmer, wrote last week ahead of O’Brien’s appearance at the RNC: “It is unconscionable for any Labor leader to lend an air of legitimacy to a candidate and a political party, neither of which can be said to have done, or can be expected to do, anything to improve the lives of the workers we are pledged to represent.”


Amazing…perhaps union groups shouldn’t be political. These people are speaking out against the support of Trump, but what about the union members who are Republican, who are afraid to speak out because..speaking out against Biden is “evil” and usually met with anger and sometimes retaliation.
 
Amazing…perhaps union groups shouldn’t be political. These people are speaking out against the support of Trump, but what about the union members who are Republican, who are afraid to speak out because..speaking out against Biden is “evil” and usually met with anger and sometimes retaliation.
I think the issue is simpler than that. A union is supposed to advocate for its members. Having their President support a party that advocates eliminating overtime, for example, is not really helping their members.
 
While the Teamster's leader is hanging out with the MAGA elite, his union is less than pleased with his speech.




O’Brien’s turn at the RNC was not appreciated by everyone at the Teamsters. The union’s official Twitter account bashed him on Tuesday after he shared a piece about his speech by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.). The piece, titled “The Promise of Pro-Labor Conservatism,” begins by suggesting that American workers are getting screwed because companies are using profits to “push diversity, equity, and inclusion and the religion of the trans flag.”

“Unions gain nothing from endorsing the racist, misogynistic, and anti-trans politics of the far right, no matter how much people like Sen. Hawley attempt to tether such bigotry to a cynical pro-labor message,” the Teamsters account wrote on X, adding: “You don’t unite a diverse working class by scoffing at its diversity.”

The Teamsters’ X account also shared a post from The Nation which said, “Despite Sean O’Brien’s support for Trump at the RNC, let’s be clear: A second Trump term would not be a win for the labor movement.” The account separately shared an X post asking: “Did anyone ask Sean O’Brien if he read the part in Project 2025 about Republicans wanting to end overtime pay? Do his union members know about this?” (Project 2025 is conservative groups’ controversial policy agenda for a second Trump term.)
O’Brien wants to have it both ways, but the labor movement is skeptical, as is his own union — as evinced not only by the rogue post on X, but what its vice president at large, John Palmer, wrote last week ahead of O’Brien’s appearance at the RNC: “It is unconscionable for any Labor leader to lend an air of legitimacy to a candidate and a political party, neither of which can be said to have done, or can be expected to do, anything to improve the lives of the workers we are pledged to represent.”

"Anti-trans politics of the far-right"?

Yeah, sounds like their account was hacked.
 
Oh, speaking of X, the leftists are howling because it seems many are getting canceled by their employers for posting things like "It's a shame Trump was not killed" and the like on X.
Well....that should actually get you fired.
 
I think the issue is simpler than that. A union is supposed to advocate for its members. Having their President support a party that advocates eliminating overtime, for example, is not really helping their members.
why are you OK with rich corps. using their money to get workers to work themselves to death with more working hrs??

people should work fewer hrs and be at home with their families more often,,
 
why are you OK with rich corps. using their money to get workers to work themselves to death with more working hrs??

people should work fewer hrs and be at home with their families more often,,
Not sure how you got that as my position. I think workers should work less hours and for more pay. If they do work more hours, overtime should be, as it is now, mandatory.
It should be the worker's choice. Many companies try their best to make overtime mandatory..now they want to skimp on the pay, fuck that.
I think that, as much as is possible, the shareholding class that contributes nothing should get less and the worker get more.
 
Last edited:
Not sure how you got that as my position. I think worker's should work less hours and for more pay. If they do work more hours, overtime should be, as it is now, mandatory.
It should be the worker's choice. Many companies try their best to make overtime mandatory..now they want to skimp on the pay, fuck that.
I think that, as much as is possible, the shareholding class that contributes nothing should get less and the worker get more.
you did it again,,

I do agree wall street should be shut down,,
but how then would democrats politicians do their insider trading,,
 
What the fuxxk is anti-trans politics? Must piss them off that kids are out of their lecherous reach.

It isn't a thing. It is some buzzwords a far-left Marxist hacker would promote in a tweet.

In the full corpus of Donald Trumps time in office and in his campaigning, what percentage value would be an accurate reflection of how often he has spoken about trans issues? 1/20th of 1%?

I don't even know what the value would be but suffice to say it is low on Trumps agenda priorities and that of his voters. These issues are outside the purview of the federal government let's face it.
 
why are you OK with rich corps. using their money to get workers to work themselves to death with more working hrs??

people should work fewer hrs and be at home with their families more often,,
They aren't going to ask you to work less hrs. They just don't want to pay you overtime wages while working overtime! That is SOOOOO MAGA!
MAGA
 

Forum List

Back
Top