Unlicensed Gun Owner Accidentally Shoots Himself In Penis

[cnm]

All semiautomatic pistols,in pistol caliber, use blowback as the reloading force.

But the Hi Point is a straight blowback that does not fire from a locked breech. Ffs.
I see you didn't look it up.

American cops, so sure they know everything about firearms because they're 'trained'.

 

[cnm]

He is correct.

He is ignoring that if it is not accidental it must be intentional.

Wrong negligence is neither intentional nor accidental

If an act is not intentional it is not planned, therefore accidental.

Wrong it is not one or the other and negligence is neither

Yes it is, no it isn't.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

‘Unlicensed Gun Owner Accidentally Shoots Himself In Penis’

One would assume he didn’t do so on purpose.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

HuffPost is now part of Oath

An unlicensed gun owner in Indiana is recovering in a hospital after accidentally shooting himself in the penis.

Mark Anthony Jones, 46, told police in Marion that he was taking a morning walk when the Hi-Point 9mm handgun he was carrying in his waistband “began to slip,” according to The Smoking Gun.

This made me chuckle. At least he didnt manage to hurt the innocent. And maybe it will prevent him from breeding.

Of course, in the gun owning community this is known as a ‘negligent discharge’ – as there are no ‘accidents’ when it comes to the handling of firearms.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“…Hi-Point 9mm handgun…”

And that would be the problem, right there – you get what you pay for.

 

[cnm]

Of course, in the gun owning community this is known as a ‘negligent discharge’ – as there are no ‘accidents’ when it comes to the handling of firearms.

In which case all accidents are the result of negligent behaviour.

'Negligent discharge' is a military term for a punishable offence, maybe with the nomenclature adopted by police as a result of military recruits to the police force, it has no bearing in reality.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He is correct.

He is ignoring that if it is not accidental it must be intentional.

Wrong negligence is neither intentional nor accidental

If an act is not intentional it is not planned, therefore accidental.

Wrong it is not one or the other and negligence is neither

Yes it is, no it isn't.

You are wrong and uninformed go study junior

 

[Soupnazi630]

Of course, in the gun owning community this is known as a ‘negligent discharge’ – as there are no ‘accidents’ when it comes to the handling of firearms.

In which case all accidents are the result of negligent behaviour.

'Negligent discharge' is a military term for a punishable offence, maybe with the nomenclature adopted by police as a result of military recruits to the police force, it has no bearing in reality.

Wrong

Accidents are unavoidable and no one's fault

Negligence is carelessness which is a deliberate choice.

This is why it is not one or the other and they are different
This is also why you are a fool who has been proven wrong but cannot admit it because you are a childish petulant brat.

The idea does reflect reality it is you ignoring reality.

Your wrong boy and you know it.

 

[WillMunny]

I don't need to be the real-life Sigmund Freud or the fictional Hannibal Lecter to have Tommy all figured out: the reason he keeps obsessively trolling & provoking everyone over the tiniest American matters that don't concern the UK in any way, shape or form, is because he WANTS one of us "bloody yanks" to stick one of our red-white-and-blue yankee-doodle-American dicks up his rectum! He clearly needs it to purge out his frantically, childishly American-paranoid demons..... with a good old American orgasm, mwhahaha!