UPDATE!--Backfire in Ohio: Mother is Pregnant by her 10 Year Old Child's Rapist!

[westwall]

I’ll believe a doctor over a lying politician.

Even a doctor that was previously sanctioned for putting politics over patients?

As THIS doctor has?

 

[otto105]

Even a doctor that was previously sanctioned for putting politics over patients?

As THIS doctor has?

Politics over patients?

When?

 

[Coyote]

I think the only one acting improperly is the AG.

Former IU dean asks Supreme Court to investigate Todd Rokita after comments about doctor

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita could face disciplinary action for statements he made regarding Indiana physician Caitlin Bernard.

www.indystar.com

 

[flacaltenn]

The provider in Indiana filled all the proper paperwork and the health service the child required.

You would use the state to force her to term, then ignore her.

I would NEVER DO THAT. And neither would the State of Ohio where this happened as I AND the Ohio AG has explained. A pregnant 10 yr old IS AN EMERGENCY and definite threat to the 10 yr old "mothers'" LIFE. THIS WHOLE SORDID AFFAIR could have fixed in OHIO.

But

1) the 1st abortion director in Ohio got the REAL story from the woman. About her 27 yr old lover who not only serially molested her 10 yr old daughter but NOW has impregnated the mother as well as the daughter.

2) THAT abortion provider took it on HER/HIMself to explain that the Ohio clinic would HAVE TO FILE with legal authorities about the rape. Women said NO -- probably told her how "GOOD my baby-daddy is" and then there was NO CHOICE other than recommend that the woman take the ABORTION OUT OF STATE to AVOID legal investigations.

3) THEN the moron Ohio clinic person -- takes to TWITTER AND posts a "sad story" about having to refer a pregnant 10 year OUT OF STATE to have an abortion' in order to SPAWN MORE FAKE abortion outrage. Her GOSSIP goes ultra viral - turns into the WORST STUPID move so far in the whole abortion blow-up.

4) THIS is where you're ignorant. KNOWING that baby momma cant' TELL THE TRUTH -- even to the INDIANA clinic -- SHE LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING SHE KNOWS about the rapist. Says it was 17 yr old boy. So Sherlock -- the PAPER FILED IN INDIANA was legally worthless. THAT clinic never DID a rape exam or SAVE VITAL legal evidence from fetal DNA.

5) RECAP -- who's potentially GUILTY of crime(s) here?

A) Definitely "he a really good man" baby daddy. IF there had been NORMAL legal filings in an OHIO abortion - law would have in the slammer until he's eligible for Medicare. Because with DNA EVIDENCE from the kid or the FETUS - he's toast.

B) PROBABLY the baby-momma for PROTECTING the "the very good man" who's now impregnated her. LIKELY will lose custody of both the kid -- maybe the unborn infant for "accessory to child molestion/rape". And if the OHIO provider is forced to testify on the CONFESSION that momma made to her -- Compared to the FALSE filing in Indiana -- she could face other charges for willfully concealing MULTIPLE FELONIES...

C) MAYBE the Ohio abortion director who HATCHED the legal work-around for whisking the 10 yr old OUT OF STATE, when HER CLINIC could have LEGALLY DONE the abortion in Ohio. If it can be proven that she COACHED the woman to lie about what was known about the rape and abuse to the clinic in Indiana.

 

[BS Filter]

Talk about dems hitching their wagon to the wrong star.

They always do. Drama queens.

 

[Leo123]

Let me get this straight: An illegal alien has a relationship with a woman and impregnates her and her 10 year old daughter. The woman claims he is innocent. Did the mother consent to the rape of her child or, if not that guy, then who raped the 10 year old?

 

[otto105]

I would NEVER DO THAT. And neither would the State of Ohio where this happened as I AND the Ohio AG has explained. A pregnant 10 yr old IS AN EMERGENCY and definite threat to the 10 yr old "mothers'" LIFE. THIS WHOLE SORDID AFFAIR could have fixed in OHIO.

But

1) the 1st abortion director in Ohio got the REAL story from the woman. About her 27 yr old lover who not only serially molested her 10 yr old daughter but NOW has impregnated the mother as well as the daughter.

2) THAT abortion provider took it on HER/HIMself to explain that the Ohio clinic would HAVE TO FILE with legal authorities about the rape. Women said NO -- probably told her how "GOOD my baby-daddy is" and then there was NO CHOICE other than recommend that the woman take the ABORTION OUT OF STATE to AVOID legal investigations.

3) THEN the moron Ohio clinic person -- takes to TWITTER AND posts a "sad story" about having to refer a pregnant 10 year OUT OF STATE to have an abortion' in order to SPAWN MORE FAKE abortion outrage. Her GOSSIP goes ultra viral - turns into the WORST STUPID move so far in the whole abortion blow-up.

4) THIS is where you're ignorant. KNOWING that baby momma cant' TELL THE TRUTH -- even to the INDIANA clinic -- SHE LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING SHE KNOWS about the rapist. Says it was 17 yr old boy. So Sherlock -- the PAPER FILED IN INDIANA was legally worthless. THAT clinic never DID a rape exam or SAVE VITAL legal evidence from fetal DNA.

5) RECAP -- who's potentially GUILTY of crime(s) here?

A) Definitely "he a really good man" baby daddy. IF there had been NORMAL legal filings in an OHIO abortion - law would have in the slammer until he's eligible for Medicare. Because with DNA EVIDENCE from the kid or the FETUS - he's toast.

B) PROBABLY the baby-momma for PROTECTING the "the very good man" who's now impregnated her. LIKELY will lose custody of both the kid -- maybe the unborn infant for "accessory to child molestion/rape". And if the OHIO provider is forced to testify on the CONFESSION that momma made to her -- Compared to the FALSE filing in Indiana -- she could face other charges for willfully concealing MULTIPLE FELONIES...

C) MAYBE the Ohio abortion director who HATCHED the legal work-around for whisking the 10 yr old OUT OF STATE, when HER CLINIC could have LEGALLY DONE the abortion in Ohio. If it can be proven that she COACHED the woman to lie about what was known about the rape and abuse to the clinic in Indiana.

No and the reason has already been explained to you.

 

[flacaltenn]

No and the reason has already been explained to you\

Sorry man. If you cant refute and pinpoint ALL of the 100s of errors in what I just wrote, you're useless.

 

[lantern2814]

I’ll believe a doctor over a lying politician.

Of course you would. But Yost never lied moron. I’ll take his word and let you continue to lie and flail around.

 

[lantern2814]

Let me get this straight: An illegal alien has a relationship with a woman and impregnates her and her 10 year old daughter. The woman claims he is innocent. Did the mother consent to the rape of her child or, if not that guy, then who raped the 10 year old?

The other question that has been brought up but the usual suspects here avoid is this: if this whole story is true, why is that child STILL IN THAT HOUSE? This whole thing has blown up in a lot of people’s faces and some doctors may be looking for a new line of work before too long.

 

[Coyote]

Of course you would. But Yost never lied moron. I’ll take his word and let you continue to lie and flail around.

Unfortunately for you, he did lie when he claimed the proper paperwork had not been done.

 

[westwall]

Unfortunately for you, he did lie when he claimed the proper paperwork had not been done.

If the proper paperwork had been done she wouldn't have fled to another State.



DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

 

[Coyote]

If the proper paperwork had been done she wouldn't have fled to another State.



DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Dumb. With the uncertainty of abortion in OH after 6 weeks, no doctor was going to risk jail.

 

[westwall]

Dumb. With the uncertainty of abortion in OH after 6 weeks, no doctor was going to risk jail.

Bullshit. She sent her to a different state because she didn't want to report her child raping boyfriend.



DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

 

[Coyote]

Bullshit. She sent her to a different state because she didn't want to report her child raping boyfriend.



DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

You are talking about the mother.

 

[MaryL]

Again mary, you can answer a simple question, right?

Yes, I'm not a liberal. Perhaps, you need to reframe your "question" in a logical coherent form. And then we can go from there.

 

[MaryL]

Totally irrelevant to this thread topic.

Made up genders are irrelevant to reality.

 

[MaryL]

The 14 year old girl was raped by an illegal alien. There's a weird kind of synchronicity here: Liberals defend both illegals or pedophiles, just condemn anti-abortion even though though that child that was raped by an illegal alien IS NOT prevented from getting an abortion in that state. Nope. Or choosing to adopt, that's also a woman's right as well. Why this contrived drama?

 

[lantern2814]

Unfortunately for you, he did lie when he claimed the proper paperwork had not been done.

Is that why they ran to another state and nothing was filed in the state where this occurred? Unfortunately for you, you’re still a liar. Keep flailing. Next lie.....

 

[Coyote]

Is that why they ran to another state and nothing was filed in the state where this occurred? Unfortunately for you, you’re still a liar. Keep flailing. Next lie.....

Noting was filed? Yet criminal charges were filed. Chew on that.