Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
THERE ARE NO PROTECTIONS FOR DOCTORS! None!
You keep referencing science and doctors as if ignorant Republicans give a shit about those things. You think professionals are going to risk their careers and freedom on whether a Republican respects the opinions of doctors? Just look how much they respect the opinion of doctors who acknowledge transgendered individuals and would prescribe hormone treatments or blockers.
Looks like a bunch if statements from the abortionists lawyer.Kind of seems this AG is talking out of his ass and grifting dumb mother fuckers on the right who would believe almost anything.
The doctor's report to state health officials on July 2 -- two days after the procedure -- indicates the pregnancy was the result of the patient being "abused."
After CNN got the documents Bernard filed with the health department, Rokita's office added: "As we stated, we are gathering evidence from multiple sources and agencies related to these allegations. Our legal review of it remains open."
CNN has asked the Indiana State Department of Child Services whether Bernard also filed a report with that office and also reached out to Ohio's attorney general.
Bernard's attorney said the doctor "took every appropriate and proper action in accordance with the law and both her medical and ethical training as a physician."
"She followed all relevant policies, procedures, and regulations in this case, just as she does every day to provide the best possible care for her patients," attorney Kathleen DeLaney said in a statement. "She has not violated any law, including patient privacy laws, and she has not been disciplined by her employer.
On Friday, DeLaney sent a cease and desist letter to the attorney general asking him to stop "making false and misleading statements about alleged misconduct by Dr. Bernard in her profession, which constitute defamation per se."
"We want (the attorney general) to stop the smear and then we want him to stop this dangerous rhetoric that he's using where he is whipping people up into a frenzy at a very unsettled time in our nation's history and we want to make sure that our client stays safe," DeLaney told CNN's Erin Burnett on Friday night.
I'll guess we'll know you're one of the mark ass bitches getting grifted by the right when talk of charging this doctor just evaporate into nothing.
The Ohio doc simply concocted the work-around. NO PAPERS FILED IN the state of residence. And I HIGHLY DOUBT that the Indiana clinic filed any "child abuse" paperwork BECAUSE the STATE of Indiana HAS NO JURISDICTION ON THE CRIMES and would be VIOLATING over-riding HIPPA law by doing so.
www.nationalreview.com
The AG has also been caught out lying.Ohio AG said there were NO PAPERS FILED on any child protection accusations that the state had received even several days after the diabolical Ohio abortion director executed this plan and they posted 'THE LIE" on social media.
This has been a big embarrassment to them, so instead of going after the mother (who did not report it) and the rapist, they’re going after the abortion doctors who reported it in the first place! How effed up is that?Kind of seems this AG is talking out of his ass and grifting dumb mother fuckers on the right who would believe almost anything.
The doctor's report to state health officials on July 2 -- two days after the procedure -- indicates the pregnancy was the result of the patient being "abused."
After CNN got the documents Bernard filed with the health department, Rokita's office added: "As we stated, we are gathering evidence from multiple sources and agencies related to these allegations. Our legal review of it remains open."
CNN has asked the Indiana State Department of Child Services whether Bernard also filed a report with that office and also reached out to Ohio's attorney general.
Bernard's attorney said the doctor "took every appropriate and proper action in accordance with the law and both her medical and ethical training as a physician."
"She followed all relevant policies, procedures, and regulations in this case, just as she does every day to provide the best possible care for her patients," attorney Kathleen DeLaney said in a statement. "She has not violated any law, including patient privacy laws, and she has not been disciplined by her employer.
On Friday, DeLaney sent a cease and desist letter to the attorney general asking him to stop "making false and misleading statements about alleged misconduct by Dr. Bernard in her profession, which constitute defamation per se."
"We want (the attorney general) to stop the smear and then we want him to stop this dangerous rhetoric that he's using where he is whipping people up into a frenzy at a very unsettled time in our nation's history and we want to make sure that our client stays safe," DeLaney told CNN's Erin Burnett on Friday night.
I'll guess we'll know you're one of the mark ass bitches getting grifted by the right when talk of charging this doctor just evaporate into nothing.
The doctor's report to state health officials on July 2 -- two days after the procedure -- indicates the pregnancy was the result of the patient being "abused."
After CNN got the documents Bernard filed with the health department, Rokita's office added: "As we stated, we are gathering evidence from multiple sources and agencies related to these allegations. Our legal review of it remains open."
CNN has asked the Indiana State Department of Child Services whether Bernard also filed a report with that office and also reached out to Ohio's attorney general.
Bernard's attorney said the doctor "took every appropriate and proper action in accordance with the law and both her medical and ethical training as a physician."
Indiana would still be required to notify Ohio of a possible crime!
Sure you are, that's why you're parroting specious claims by an AG who's going to find himself sued for defamation if he keeps running his mouth.If all youre selling is political elixir -- I'm full up. Not interested. I'm interested in getting the abortion issue RIGHT -- after the political yahoo yelling/screaming is over.
hey moron. Wake the fuck up from your CNN haze and realize
1) ONLY papers filed were in INDIANA, not in state of residence -OHIO.
From the same article:2) The mom was TOLD to take the kid OUT OF STATE and the Ohio abortion counselor who set this up either DIDN"T KNOW the father or coached her to lie or mislead about the "father". Which SHE DID IN THOSE PAPERS. They were USELESS to the state of OHIO -- IF the State of OHIO EVER RECEIVED A COPY. Which I doubt. Because
No one is disputing that the mother appears to lying and a party to her daughters rape, CNN however has corroborated these facts with documents filed in court in Ohio and with child services in Indiana independent of the mother's claims.3) Indiana has ZERO JURISDICTION ON THE CASE. AND the mother lied anyways.
So you're mad Indiana didn't violate the law?SURE. For the state of Indiana that's correct. But the state of Indiana has no interest in sharing medical records for legal purposes to the state of Ohio and cannot violate patient HIPPA PRIVACY law which ARE FEDERAL to SHARE with the state of Residency in Ohio. So the State of Ohio MISSED THE OPPORTUNTY OF OBTAINING DNA evidence from the fetus and will have a hard time with the case since the baby-momma LOVES her child rapist and wants to protect him.
NO, you’re just spewing shit again. You laughably claim doctors know the law better than the AG. Yost stayed that being 10 would automatically place her in the exemption list. Period. End of argument. Quit lying.The Ohio AG said this:
Ohio AG clarifies Ohio abortion ban exemptions
Ohio's six-week abortion ban contains three exemptions in the legislation.www.13abc.com
Yost says there are three exemptions to the abortion ban:
None those would apply with out question, to this case.
- Cases of ectopic pregnancy
- Cases that would cause death of the mother
- Cases that cause a serious risk of substantial, irreversible impairment to a major bodily function of the mother
And more lies from the AG…Docs dispute AG's claim that Ohio law allows 10-year-olds to get abortions - Ohio Capital Journal
Another Democrat heroine...The narrative is officially crushed.
Telemundo Reporter Confirms Woman’s Domestic Relationship in Ohio Child Rape Case – Mother is Pregnant by Her Child’s Rapist! (VIDEO)
Telemundo Reporter Confirms Woman's Domestic Relationship in Ohio Child Rape Case - Mother is Pregnant by Her Child's Rapist! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Telemundo reporter María Vargas Pión on Friday confirmed the man who raped a 10-year child in Ohio is indeed in a relationship with the victim’s mother.www.thegatewaypundit.com
How does that change the fact that you right wingers claimed that this child's rape was a hoax?The narrative is officially crushed.
Telemundo Reporter Confirms Woman’s Domestic Relationship in Ohio Child Rape Case – Mother is Pregnant by Her Child’s Rapist! (VIDEO)
Telemundo Reporter Confirms Woman's Domestic Relationship in Ohio Child Rape Case - Mother is Pregnant by Her Child's Rapist! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Telemundo reporter María Vargas Pión on Friday confirmed the man who raped a 10-year child in Ohio is indeed in a relationship with the victim’s mother.
It is NOT WRITTEN IN THE LAW. There is no exception for age. That means it could be prosecuted regardless of what the AG says.NO, you’re just spewing shit again. You laughably claim doctors know the law better than the AG. Yost stayed that being 10 would automatically place her in the exemption list. Period. End of argument. Quit lying.
2) The mom was TOLD to take the kid OUT OF STATE and the Ohio abortion counselor who set this up either DIDN"T KNOW the father or coached her to lie or mislead about the "father". Which SHE DID IN THOSE PAPERS. They were USELESS to the state of OHIO -- IF the State of OHIO EVER RECEIVED A COPY. Which I doubt. Because
You don’t know that.3) Indiana has ZERO JURISDICTION ON THE CASE. AND the mother lied anyways.
4)
SURE. For the state of Indiana that's correct. But the state of Indiana has no interest in sharing medical records for legal purposes to the state of Ohio and cannot violate patient HIPPA PRIVACY law which ARE FEDERAL to SHARE with the state of Residency in Ohio. So the State of Ohio MISSED THE OPPORTUNTY OF OBTAINING DNA evidence from the fetus and will have a hard time with the case since the baby-momma LOVES her child rapist and wants to protect him.
i say two of the three yoj listed applies to this caseThe Ohio AG said this:
Ohio AG clarifies Ohio abortion ban exemptions
Ohio's six-week abortion ban contains three exemptions in the legislation.
Yost says there are three exemptions to the abortion ban:
None those would apply with out question, to this case.
- Cases of ectopic pregnancy
- Cases that would cause death of the mother
- Cases that cause a serious risk of substantial, irreversible impairment to a major bodily function of the mother
And more lies from the AG…Docs dispute AG's claim that Ohio law allows 10-year-olds to get abortions - Ohio Capital Journal
"bare a child"No, she could not have mary.
But hey, your the ghoul who would have the state force this child to bare a child.
Come n Olde Russian dudeApparently, according to liberals, GRAVITY is racist as well, because it is a "construct" that keeps us all DOWN. ( never mind say the we use it to put satellites in orbit). Facts are NOT liberals' friend.
Stop lying moron. Bold facing your lies doesn’t make them true. Thinking it funny that Yost told the truth. You’re a lying idiot. I’ll take Yost’s word over you all day every day. Cry harder.It is NOT WRITTEN IN THE LAW. There is no exception for age. That means it could be prosecuted regardless of what the AG says.
I’ll believe a doctor over a lying politician.Stop lying moron. Bold facing your lies doesn’t make them true. Thinking it funny that Yost told the truth. You’re a lying idiot. I’ll take Yost’s word over you all day every day. Cry harder.
The provider in Indiana filled all the proper paperwork and the health service the child required.I told you that already. The AGeneral of ILLINOIS reminded folks that the kid WOULD be able to have an abortion under Illinois state law. This whole thing is about THE MOTHER NOT wanting the rape reported.
So she found an IMMORAL, law avoiding abortion director who got her into some chop shop in Indiana where they serviced the kid WITHOUT ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT CHILD ABUSE.
Who wants that? 10 yr old pregnant and an abortion provider WILLING TO PROTECT the child rapist? Which TURNS OUT to be the father of fetus the MOTHER IS NOW CARRYING.
You'd certainly TURN YOUR back on a CHILD AND WOMAN abuser. Wouldn't ya??????
No questions asked abortions --- DO NOT APPLY TO RAPED 10 year olds -- you despicable moron.
