IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
To qualify for full SS bennies you must now be 67, bub...
That means that more than 80% of the years in your cohort are short of that threshold.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
US adds massive 287,000 jobs in June.....Quite A Change From Bush's Fiasco
- Thread starter Campbell
- Start date
To qualify for full SS bennies you must now be 67, bub...
That means that more than 80% of the years in your cohort are short of that threshold.
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
Hmmm, what was it on the last day the republicans had majority power at the end of 2006?What was it on Feb 1, 2009?What was Scrub bequeathed?
The unemployment rate at the beginning of 2001 was about 4.2% when President Bush took office.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/history/empsit_02022001.txt
The democrats had majority power from 2007 till 2014. Including a super majority from 2009 till 2010.
What were the "stats" that you love so much during Pelosi's reign? Hmmmm?
Do you think for one moment a person who has an ability to think for myself is going to accept any sort of data that comes from any government agency under this administration?
I can already tell that you are the sort of person that still believes it was due to a video and really don't care that people could not their doctor or their plan like obama said they could.
Ahhhhh, what do you care? Just marching on to the beat of the socialist drum.
Never mind the smoke, just post the number....
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 31,603
- 9,260
The age cohort is 55 to 69, bub.
You Prog Loons keep saying that the reason the Labor Force Participation Rate is declining is due to Boomer Retirement. Well, Boomers are increasing their LFPR while young people are leaving the workforce. It's sad, and it doesn't bode well for the future of the country.
This is false, even with the LFPR gains in 55+ cohort it is still MUCH lower than LFPR in prime age group, so as 55+ group keeps growing over next decade or two LFPR is expected to decline
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
Go Full Dumbass....94,000,000 people disagree with you......The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Great job by our President
Who are these 94 million?
Theowl32
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2013
- 22,900
- 17,293
Man, you are a ripe one.Hmmm, what was it on the last day the republicans had majority power at the end of 2006?What was it on Feb 1, 2009?What was Scrub bequeathed?
The unemployment rate at the beginning of 2001 was about 4.2% when President Bush took office.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/history/empsit_02022001.txt
The democrats had majority power from 2007 till 2014. Including a super majority from 2009 till 2010.
What were the "stats" that you love so much during Pelosi's reign? Hmmmm?
Do you think for one moment a person who has an ability to think for myself is going to accept any sort of data that comes from any government agency under this administration?
I can already tell that you are the sort of person that still believes it was due to a video and really don't care that people could not their doctor or their plan like obama said they could.
Ahhhhh, what do you care? Just marching on to the beat of the socialist drum.
Never mind the smoke, just post the number....
owebo
Gold Member
- Jul 4, 2016
- 18,638
- 2,011
You mean like fired and abandoned looking.....you libtards are a complete failure....94,000,000 people disagree with you......The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Great job by our President
yeah because unlike you they know the difference between not in the workforce and unemployed
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
And for every 1 retirement eligible who keeps working, 3 stop....The age cohort is 55 to 69, bub.
You Prog Loons keep saying that the reason the Labor Force Participation Rate is declining is due to Boomer Retirement. Well, Boomers are increasing their LFPR while young people are leaving the workforce. It's sad, and it doesn't bode well for the future of the country.
This is false, even with the LFPR gains in 55+ cohort it is still MUCH lower than prime age cohort, so as 55+ group keeps growing over next decade or two LFPR is expected to decline
- Feb 12, 2007
- 59,439
- 24,106
About those jobs: Most were taken by people who should be entering retirement. Young workers lost jobs.
View attachment 80858
90% Of June Job Gains Went To Workers 55 And Older | Zero Hedge
55 year olds should be retiring? What is this....Greece?
I wanted to get a better look at this ZeroHedge twaddle, but the site is a honeytrap for rubes and bristling with scripts...
So I'll have to go to BLS....once my box is released from the endless tangle of bullshit running on that site....
The age cohort is 55 to 69, bub.
You Prog Loons keep saying that the reason the Labor Force Participation Rate is declining is due to Boomer Retirement. Well, Boomers are increasing their LFPR while young people are leaving the workforce. It's sad, and it doesn't bode well for the future of the country.
To qualify for full SS bennies you must now be 67, bub...
That means that more than 80% of the years in your cohort are short of that threshold.
Scuze moi, bub, but not everyone plans to live solely on SS benefits. ZIRP has destroyed the value of safe retirement investments.
I have no idea how old you are, but you are either a very ignorant young person or an older person who is too stupid to be helped. If the former, please develop some financial literacy and do the math to figure out what a lifestyle based solely on SS benefits will be like when you retire. And then figure out how to save for your own retirement. That is, if you are capable of finding and performing a decent paying job.
Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2013
- 94,529
- 66,431
That barely breaks even with population growth.The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Call me when it gets to the million jobs in a month Reagan had.
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
Do you need help finding it?Man, you are a ripe one.Hmmm, what was it on the last day the republicans had majority power at the end of 2006?What was it on Feb 1, 2009?What was Scrub bequeathed?
The unemployment rate at the beginning of 2001 was about 4.2% when President Bush took office.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/history/empsit_02022001.txt
The democrats had majority power from 2007 till 2014. Including a super majority from 2009 till 2010.
What were the "stats" that you love so much during Pelosi's reign? Hmmmm?
Do you think for one moment a person who has an ability to think for myself is going to accept any sort of data that comes from any government agency under this administration?
I can already tell that you are the sort of person that still believes it was due to a video and really don't care that people could not their doctor or their plan like obama said they could.
Ahhhhh, what do you care? Just marching on to the beat of the socialist drum.
Never mind the smoke, just post the number....
owebo
Gold Member
- Jul 4, 2016
- 18,638
- 2,011
They are the people you fucktardsliberals ignore....but hey, we are under 5% UE right?Go Full Dumbass....94,000,000 people disagree with you......The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Great job by our President
Who are these 94 million?
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
I spend more time with a calculator crunching financial and economic data than you spend clipping coupons for kittylitter, grandma...though not nearly as much as you spend being led around by the nose by Drudge...About those jobs: Most were taken by people who should be entering retirement. Young workers lost jobs.
View attachment 80858
90% Of June Job Gains Went To Workers 55 And Older | Zero Hedge
55 year olds should be retiring? What is this....Greece?
I wanted to get a better look at this ZeroHedge twaddle, but the site is a honeytrap for rubes and bristling with scripts...
So I'll have to go to BLS....once my box is released from the endless tangle of bullshit running on that site....
The age cohort is 55 to 69, bub.
You Prog Loons keep saying that the reason the Labor Force Participation Rate is declining is due to Boomer Retirement. Well, Boomers are increasing their LFPR while young people are leaving the workforce. It's sad, and it doesn't bode well for the future of the country.
To qualify for full SS bennies you must now be 67, bub...
That means that more than 80% of the years in your cohort are short of that threshold.
Scuze moi, bub, but not everyone plans to live solely on SS benefits. ZIRP has destroyed the value of safe retirement investments.
I have no idea how old you are, but you are either a very ignorant young person or an older person who is too stupid to be helped. If the former, please develop some financial literacy and do the math to figure out what a lifestyle based solely on SS benefits will be like when you retire. And then figure out how to save for your own retirement. That is, if you are capable of finding and performing a decent paying job.
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
You have no idea, do you....They are the people you fucktardsliberals ignore....but hey, we are under 5% UE right?Go Full Dumbass....94,000,000 people disagree with you......The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Great job by our President
Who are these 94 million?
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
That barely breaks even with population growth.The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Call me when it gets to the million jobs in a month Reagan had.
Can you name the POTUS under whom job growth exceeded population growth?
"A month" being the operative words here......anything special happen during that month?
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,174
- 157,901
94,000,000 people disagree with you......The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Great job by our President
Which people are those?
Retirees, 16 year olds, handicapped, stay at home moms
You know the ones conservatives call lazy
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
Do you think that description applies to the 94 million?You mean like fired and abandoned looking.....you libtards are a complete failure....94,000,000 people disagree with you......The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Great job by our President
yeah because unlike you they know the difference between not in the workforce and unemployed
Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2013
- 94,529
- 66,431
287K is bare minimum for a recovery. Also, wages contune to fall.That barely breaks even with population growth.The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Call me when it gets to the million jobs in a month Reagan had.
Can you name the POTUS under whom job growth exceeded population growth?
"A month" being the operative words here......anything special happen during that month?
8 years of saying this is the summer of recovery and onto year 9.
owebo
Gold Member
- Jul 4, 2016
- 18,638
- 2,011
That's what you're told by you're slave master there on the plantation....go with it....you wouldn't fucking understand the truth anyway....94,000,000 people disagree with you......The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Great job by our President
Which people are those?
Retirees, 16 year olds, handicapped, stay at home moms
You know the ones conservatives call lazy
owebo
Gold Member
- Jul 4, 2016
- 18,638
- 2,011
It's actually about 350k.....but let's not shit on the liberals parade of fail....287K is bare minimum for a recovery. Also, wages contune to fall.That barely breaks even with population growth.The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Call me when it gets to the million jobs in a month Reagan had.
Can you name the POTUS under whom job growth exceeded population growth?
"A month" being the operative words here......anything special happen during that month?
8 years of saying this is the summer of recovery and onto year 9.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,174
- 157,901
287K is bare minimum for a recovery. Also, wages contune to fall.That barely breaks even with population growth.The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...
Call me when it gets to the million jobs in a month Reagan had.
Can you name the POTUS under whom job growth exceeded population growth?
"A month" being the operative words here......anything special happen during that month?
8 years of saying this is the summer of recovery and onto year 9.
Bullshit ....287,000 is good in any economy
Where in the jobs report does it say that wages fell? You are just making shit up again
Similar threads
- Replies
- 43
- Views
- 416
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 266
- Poll
- Replies
- 202
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 81
- Views
- 654
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 64
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 12
- Replies
- 67
- Views
- 296
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8497
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 482
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-