2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,236
- 52,460
- 2,290
It means he didn't have to have all the money to cover the cost of the guns to acquire them.
Did you not notice that part?
And?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It means he didn't have to have all the money to cover the cost of the guns to acquire them.
Did you not notice that part?
The question to ask is how much does each indivisual politician receive from the NRA in order to do their bidding? I bet it's way more than their yearly salary from the government.
The question to ask is how much does each indivisual politician receive from the NRA in order to do their bidding? I bet it's way more than their yearly salary from the government.
Cops could have taken him down traitor but they refused. You scum wantDunno what to think about this. Apparently the shooter at the Uvalde school bought his guns legally, and waited until just a day or two after his 18th birthday so he could legally buy the weapons and the ammo. Do we need to change the gun laws? I don't really think so, as the laws that are currently on the books are sufficient IF they are enforced.
Do we need to take a closer look at who buys the guns? Maybe, but that would also put a serious burden on people who aren't bat shit crazy who want to buy guns by making them wait and pass checks.
Sorry, but as long as we have guns legally available for purchase, there will continue to be people who slip through the cracks and commit these kinds of atrocious acts.
Uvalde gunman legally bought AR rifles days before shooting, law enforcement says
He brought only one of the rifles with him into the elementary school, according to the briefing. The other was left in a truck he crashed nearby.www.texastribune.org
The gunman in the deadliest school shooting in Texas history bought two AR-style rifles legally just after his 18th birthday — days before his assault on Robb Elementary School in Uvalde.
UPDATED: MAY 25, 2022
He legally purchased two AR platform rifles from a federally licensed gun store on two days: May 17 — just a day after his birthday — and May 20, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said, according to a briefing that state Sen. John Whitmire, chair of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee, received from state authorities late Tuesday. The gunman bought 375 rounds of 5.56-caliber ammunition on May 18.
In Texas, you must be at least 18 years old to buy a rifle, and the state does not require a license to openly carry one in public.
The real question to ask you ghouls is how many more innocent people do you want to be at the mercy of violent criminals?The question to ask is how much does each indivisual politician receive from the NRA in order to do their bidding? I bet it's way more than their yearly salary from the government.
It is a complete sentence. Go back to third grade English class.That’s an incorrect statement. It’s not a complete sentence. Now, go get the 2a and write it correctly. Otherwise, you’re lying.
This is weapon grade stupid.Over turn it ? It’s written exactly the way it should be. You want to shoot military weapons, joint the Army/Guard. That’s what “well regulated” means. You want to have personal firearm protection ? You have to qualify. People are not persons. If it were a personal right, it would say “persons”.
So, the Supreme Court gets to call the shots. The way it should be. You may support the free availability for an AR15 to shoot up the landscape . Not me…..
Dunno what to think about this. Apparently the shooter at the Uvalde school bought his guns legally, and waited until just a day or two after his 18th birthday so he could legally buy the weapons and the ammo. Do we need to change the gun laws? I don't really think so, as the laws that are currently on the books are sufficient IF they are enforced.
Do we need to take a closer look at who buys the guns? Maybe, but that would also put a serious burden on people who aren't bat shit crazy who want to buy guns by making them wait and pass checks.
Sorry, but as long as we have guns legally available for purchase, there will continue to be people who slip through the cracks and commit these kinds of atrocious acts.
Uvalde gunman legally bought AR rifles days before shooting, law enforcement says
He brought only one of the rifles with him into the elementary school, according to the briefing. The other was left in a truck he crashed nearby.www.texastribune.org
The gunman in the deadliest school shooting in Texas history bought two AR-style rifles legally just after his 18th birthday — days before his assault on Robb Elementary School in Uvalde.
UPDATED: MAY 25, 2022
He legally purchased two AR platform rifles from a federally licensed gun store on two days: May 17 — just a day after his birthday — and May 20, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said, according to a briefing that state Sen. John Whitmire, chair of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee, received from state authorities late Tuesday. The gunman bought 375 rounds of 5.56-caliber ammunition on May 18.
In Texas, you must be at least 18 years old to buy a rifle, and the state does not require a license to openly carry one in public.
No, that's wrong.The few are gun owners, the majority are not gun owners.
SUUUUUUUUURE you did!We just had a gun a holic admit he could transfer guns to anyone, if he wanted to.
Fuck off brit and stick to kissing the asshole of the queenSo that's a no, Yank, lol.
Say 15 year intervals. Say you're 60 and in 15 years, the 2nd gets amended, "The Right to Bear Arms" is removed. Will it effect you at aged 75? No. In another 15 years time, everyone with a gun needs a firearms certificate with the gun serial numbers listed. Will it effect you at age 90? No. In another 15 years time, the likes of the AR-15 are banned. Will that effect you at age 105? No. In another 15 years time, you cannot wander around with a gun, must be kept in a secure cabinet when not in use. Wi it effect you at age 120? No. In another 15 years time, handguns are banned under the length of 12 inches. Will that effect you at age 135? No.
And as that continues over the decades, America gets more gun safe at your disgust.
Are you on crack?Laws simply do not work. If someone is intent on breaking the law they will break the law.
As such we should dispense with all laws and return to "Wild West Justice". That fits well with the ideal of arming teachers...we may as well arm EVERYONE. Let EVERYONE figure out what's right in their book and dispense their justice as they see fit.
THIS is the America ruled by the Second Amendment! THE ONLY AMENDMENT OF ANY VALUE.
Guns solve ALL PROBLEMS.
And by "nutters," of course, you mean "people who do not agree with you."Neat.
Not only are you wrong, we also need better laws and systems to keep guns out of the hands of nutters.
Liar.Wrong. That's the strawman you invented to make it easier for yourself to make vapid, emotional points.
I wouldn't take away your guns.
As opposed to gun a holics using guns as currency in the drug trade ?More made up bs from you. What do you do for fun....forge money?
That’s a class gun a holics put things that are way beyond their comprehension……This is weapon grade stupid.
No, try again.That’s a class gun a holics put things that are way beyond their comprehension……
In EVERY Amendment that uses the phrase "the people" before Heller they were all UNDERSTOOD to mean an Individual right. I suggest you explain how in all those amendments it is meant as a collective right?That’s a class gun a holics put things that are way beyond their comprehension……
Guess you never consulted a dictionary. If they had meant every individual, they would have used “person.” like the constitution does. The constitution makes that distinction everywhere else they use the word “people” vs “persons”.In EVERY Amendment that uses the phrase "the people" before Heller they were all UNDERSTOOD to mean an Individual right. I suggest you explain how in all those amendments it is meant as a collective right?
Nope......for one thing, it only applies to the collective right to form a militia with only those in the regulated militia having the right to bear arms.In EVERY Amendment that uses the phrase "the people" before Heller they were all UNDERSTOOD to mean an Individual right. I suggest you explain how in all those amendments it is meant as a collective right?
Wah....child.Fuck off brit and stick to kissing the asshole of the queen