Valerie Plame for Congress

[Faun]

Fucking moron....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

"She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson's employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States."​

Perhaps they should have told her not to drive to the CIA headquarters every morning and park her car in their parking lot.

Parking at a CIA building would not have made her a target, and it would not have made her at risk for traveling to the Mideast, where she could easily have been kidnapped or killed, by anyone who discovered how high up she was.
The revelations by Scooter also disclosed that the US was conducting WMD sting operations, and Libby ruined that regardless of who they would have replaced Plame with.

It certainly would have made her a target. You think foreign governments don't keep track of who goes in and out of the CIA headquarters? If you show up to work in Langley Virginia, you aren't a covert agent, period.

That is ridiculous.
There are thousands of people working there, and most of them are just pencil pushers.
The only people who would be in danger would be those who traveled to the Mideast.
And Plame was one of only a very small number of people who did that.

And again, it was not just that Plame worked for the CIA that Libby revealed, but that Plame was working on a WMD sting in the Mideast. They is covered by many other laws on leaking classified information.

None of the people working at Langley are covert agents. They work in the field. If they suddenly made a trip to Langley Virginia, don't you imagine that would blow their cover?

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

As if a fucking moron like you knows that.

 

[Rigby5]

Ex-CIA operative, Valerie Plame, running for New Mexico's 3rd district.

"Operative"?

You misspelled "analyst whom everyone in DC knew worked for CIA".

Yo're welcome.

Plame was not an analyst.
She was in charge of the whole Mideast operations for the CIA.
She routinely went to the Mideast under the cover of just traveling with her husband, ambassador Wilson.

She ran a desk. She wasn't a field agent.

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

 

[Rambunctious]

The daily caller lies.

Valerie Plame Lied To Voters In Her Very First Campaign Ad

 

[Rambunctious]

Perhaps they should have told her not to drive to the CIA headquarters every morning and park her car in their parking lot.

Parking at a CIA building would not have made her a target, and it would not have made her at risk for traveling to the Mideast, where she could easily have been kidnapped or killed, by anyone who discovered how high up she was.
The revelations by Scooter also disclosed that the US was conducting WMD sting operations, and Libby ruined that regardless of who they would have replaced Plame with.

It certainly would have made her a target. You think foreign governments don't keep track of who goes in and out of the CIA headquarters? If you show up to work in Langley Virginia, you aren't a covert agent, period.

That is ridiculous.
There are thousands of people working there, and most of them are just pencil pushers.
The only people who would be in danger would be those who traveled to the Mideast.
And Plame was one of only a very small number of people who did that.

And again, it was not just that Plame worked for the CIA that Libby revealed, but that Plame was working on a WMD sting in the Mideast. They is covered by many other laws on leaking classified information.

None of the people working at Langley are covert agents. They work in the field. If they suddenly made a trip to Langley Virginia, don't you imagine that would blow their cover?

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

As if a fucking moron like you knows that.

Caught you lying again....

 

[Faun]

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

The long time republican extremist Victoria Toensing who is married to Trump's lawyer?
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
{...
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
Update: Toensing reportedly may also join Trump's legal team

WRITTEN BY MATT GERTZ

PUBLISHED 03/19/18 4:57 PM EDT
...
But beyond that, diGenova’s wife and law partner, Victoria Toensing, who is also a longtime Republican activist and lawyer, is representing a purported “witness” whose claims are at the center of a right-wing media effort to have another special counsel appointed. In theory, this second special counsel would be able to investigate Mueller himself over a shoddily constructed conspiracy theory involving the Russian nuclear energy agency’s 2010 acquisition of Uranium One, a company with licenses to extract U.S. uranium.
...}

How does that matter when she wrote the fucking law, moron?

Because you're incapable of quoting what she said about Plame in regards to that law and you're incapable of posting the law in question.

However, Plame’s government did not betray her. Libby did not leak Plame’s identity as a CIA officer, Richard Armitage did. Armitage and the columnist to whom he leaked, Robert Novak, have both confirmed that.

Dumbfuck, You've been shown repeatedly that Libby leaked her name. That you still can't understand that falls solely on your own G-d given limitations.

 

[Faun]

He owes you dinner now for that reach-around

You owe us both dinner for being wrong all of the time...

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

You did nothing of the sort. You quoted an establishment hack who had a vested interest in a particular answer.

LOLOL

I quote the lead investigator into the matter. Whereas your source to anything contrary -- is you.

 

[Rambunctious]

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

The long time republican extremist Victoria Toensing who is married to Trump's lawyer?
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
{...
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
Update: Toensing reportedly may also join Trump's legal team

WRITTEN BY MATT GERTZ

PUBLISHED 03/19/18 4:57 PM EDT
...
But beyond that, diGenova’s wife and law partner, Victoria Toensing, who is also a longtime Republican activist and lawyer, is representing a purported “witness” whose claims are at the center of a right-wing media effort to have another special counsel appointed. In theory, this second special counsel would be able to investigate Mueller himself over a shoddily constructed conspiracy theory involving the Russian nuclear energy agency’s 2010 acquisition of Uranium One, a company with licenses to extract U.S. uranium.
...}

How does that matter when she wrote the fucking law, moron?

Because you're incapable of quoting what she said about Plame in regards to that law and you're incapable of posting the law in question.

However, Plame’s government did not betray her. Libby did not leak Plame’s identity as a CIA officer, Richard Armitage did. Armitage and the columnist to whom he leaked, Robert Novak, have both confirmed that.

Dumbfuck, You've been shown repeatedly that Libby leaked her name. That you still can't understand that falls solely on your own G-d given limitations.

 

[bripat9643]

Perhaps they should have told her not to drive to the CIA headquarters every morning and park her car in their parking lot.

Parking at a CIA building would not have made her a target, and it would not have made her at risk for traveling to the Mideast, where she could easily have been kidnapped or killed, by anyone who discovered how high up she was.
The revelations by Scooter also disclosed that the US was conducting WMD sting operations, and Libby ruined that regardless of who they would have replaced Plame with.

It certainly would have made her a target. You think foreign governments don't keep track of who goes in and out of the CIA headquarters? If you show up to work in Langley Virginia, you aren't a covert agent, period.

That is ridiculous.
There are thousands of people working there, and most of them are just pencil pushers.
The only people who would be in danger would be those who traveled to the Mideast.
And Plame was one of only a very small number of people who did that.

And again, it was not just that Plame worked for the CIA that Libby revealed, but that Plame was working on a WMD sting in the Mideast. They is covered by many other laws on leaking classified information.

None of the people working at Langley are covert agents. They work in the field. If they suddenly made a trip to Langley Virginia, don't you imagine that would blow their cover?

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

As if a fucking moron like you knows that.

People who don't know that are the fucking morons, moron.

 

[Faun]

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

Valerie Plame Lied To Voters In Her Very First Campaign Ad

In the ad, Plame suggests she was stationed in Iran and the DPRK, which she was not. She also uses the CIA seal, which is illegal, as use the use of official government seals and logos without permission is restricted by federal law.

LOL

Again, the daily caller is fake news. In no way does she "suggest" she was stationed there. She listed countries she worked in on assignment.

 

[bripat9643]

"Operative"?

You misspelled "analyst whom everyone in DC knew worked for CIA".

Yo're welcome.

Plame was not an analyst.
She was in charge of the whole Mideast operations for the CIA.
She routinely went to the Mideast under the cover of just traveling with her husband, ambassador Wilson.

She ran a desk. She wasn't a field agent.

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

 

[Rigby5]

I posted the fucking truth, Trump boy. If you were better ionformed, you would fucking know it.

You lied kid, Armitage was the "leaker". You need a better education.

Nope, you're the liar. Armitage was merely the first one to inform the press about Plame. Rove and Libby also informed the press.

By the time Scooter came around her identity was out there...he was a political prisoner....and Bush let him take the heat...swampers are ruthlessly self indulgent and sinister...

Wrong.
Earlier people mentioning Plame, like Armitage, had no idea she was running the WMD sting operation.
Armitage speculated about nepotism recommending Wilson, not about the WMD sting operation.

Well today she knows an innocent man was jailed in connection to her employment disclosure......heard anything from her?...

You seem confused.
Armitage broke no law in speculating.
Libby totally violated half a dozen laws, not just by revealing for sure Plame was a covert CIA agent, but also the classified WMD sting operation she was working on, and could only have the motive of doing it deliberately in order to harm Plame in retaliation.
No way was Libby innocent.
Plame might have been able to capture hundreds of potential terrorists if her cover had not been blown and the operation revealed.

 

[bripat9643]

He owes you dinner now for that reach-around

You owe us both dinner for being wrong all of the time...

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

You did nothing of the sort. You quoted an establishment hack who had a vested interest in a particular answer.

LOLOL

I quote the lead investigator into the matter. Whereas your source to anything contrary -- is you.

He is the guy with the vested interest in your position, shit for brains.

 

[Rambunctious]

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

Valerie Plame Lied To Voters In Her Very First Campaign Ad

In the ad, Plame suggests she was stationed in Iran and the DPRK, which she was not. She also uses the CIA seal, which is illegal, as use the use of official government seals and logos without permission is restricted by federal law.

LOL

Again, the daily caller is fake news. In no way does she "suggest" she was stationed there. She listed countries she worked in on assignment.

The only time she left the states was when she was on vacation....

 

[bripat9643]

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

The long time republican extremist Victoria Toensing who is married to Trump's lawyer?
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
{...
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
Update: Toensing reportedly may also join Trump's legal team

WRITTEN BY MATT GERTZ

PUBLISHED 03/19/18 4:57 PM EDT
...
But beyond that, diGenova’s wife and law partner, Victoria Toensing, who is also a longtime Republican activist and lawyer, is representing a purported “witness” whose claims are at the center of a right-wing media effort to have another special counsel appointed. In theory, this second special counsel would be able to investigate Mueller himself over a shoddily constructed conspiracy theory involving the Russian nuclear energy agency’s 2010 acquisition of Uranium One, a company with licenses to extract U.S. uranium.
...}

How does that matter when she wrote the fucking law, moron?

Because you're incapable of quoting what she said about Plame in regards to that law and you're incapable of posting the law in question.

However, Plame’s government did not betray her. Libby did not leak Plame’s identity as a CIA officer, Richard Armitage did. Armitage and the columnist to whom he leaked, Robert Novak, have both confirmed that.

Dumbfuck, You've been shown repeatedly that Libby leaked her name. That you still can't understand that falls solely on your own G-d given limitations.

How can you "leak" a name that has already become public?

 

[Rambunctious]

You lied kid, Armitage was the "leaker". You need a better education.

Nope, you're the liar. Armitage was merely the first one to inform the press about Plame. Rove and Libby also informed the press.

By the time Scooter came around her identity was out there...he was a political prisoner....and Bush let him take the heat...swampers are ruthlessly self indulgent and sinister...

Wrong.
Earlier people mentioning Plame, like Armitage, had no idea she was running the WMD sting operation.
Armitage speculated about nepotism recommending Wilson, not about the WMD sting operation.

Well today she knows an innocent man was jailed in connection to her employment disclosure......heard anything from her?...

You seem confused.
Armitage broke no law in speculating.
Libby totally violated half a dozen laws, not just by revealing for sure Plame was a covert CIA agent, but also the classified WMD sting operation she was working on, and could only have the motive of doing it deliberately in order to harm Plame in retaliation.
No way was Libby innocent.
Plame might have been able to capture hundreds of potential terrorists if her cover had not been blown and the operation revealed.

Another poor misled misinformed American....

Valerie Plame Lied To Voters In Her Very First Campaign Ad

 

[Faun]

Plame was not an analyst.
She was in charge of the whole Mideast operations for the CIA.
She routinely went to the Mideast under the cover of just traveling with her husband, ambassador Wilson.

She ran a desk. She wasn't a field agent.

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

Whereas .... you posted nothing.

 

[Rigby5]

Plame was not an analyst.
She was in charge of the whole Mideast operations for the CIA.
She routinely went to the Mideast under the cover of just traveling with her husband, ambassador Wilson.

She ran a desk. She wasn't a field agent.

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

No, John Dean is only 1 paragraph of the article, which is WRITTEN BY ANDREW SEIFTER.
Anyone over seas, like a courier, is covered by the laws against disclosure.
All CIA employees and their operations are always classified and illegal to disclose.
Again, there is not just 1 law, and there is not just 1 source.

Care to explain how outing a WMD sting in progress is not a crime?

 

[Faun]

He owes you dinner now for that reach-around

You owe us both dinner for being wrong all of the time...

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

You did nothing of the sort. You quoted an establishment hack who had a vested interest in a particular answer.

LOLOL

I quote the lead investigator into the matter. Whereas your source to anything contrary -- is you.

He is the guy with the vested interest in your position, shit for brains.

And still, all you have is, "nuh-uh." You poor little fucking moron.

 

[bripat9643]

She ran a desk. She wasn't a field agent.

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

Whereas .... you posted nothing.

Valerie Plame for Congress

 

[Rambunctious]

She ran a desk. She wasn't a field agent.

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

Whereas .... you posted nothing.

“In under 90 seconds Valerie Plame lies to voters, breaks federal law, sweeps her own anti-Semitism under the rug and threatens to use elected office to get revenge on her political enemies. Plame is completely unfit for Congress,” NRCC Spokesman Bob Salera told the Daily Caller.