Valerie Plame for Congress

[Rigby5]

He owes you dinner now for that reach-around

You owe us both dinner for being wrong all of the time...

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

You did nothing of the sort. You quoted an establishment hack who had a vested interest in a particular answer.

LOLOL

I quote the lead investigator into the matter. Whereas your source to anything contrary -- is you.

He is the guy with the vested interest in your position, shit for brains.

LIbby appealed the conviction and lost.
He was clearly lying and lost track of his lies.

 

[Rigby5]

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

Valerie Plame Lied To Voters In Her Very First Campaign Ad

In the ad, Plame suggests she was stationed in Iran and the DPRK, which she was not. She also uses the CIA seal, which is illegal, as use the use of official government seals and logos without permission is restricted by federal law.

LOL

Again, the daily caller is fake news. In no way does she "suggest" she was stationed there. She listed countries she worked in on assignment.

The only time she left the states was when she was on vacation....

That is a lie.
To make the WMD sting operation work, she has to go to the Mideast over half a dozen times a year, and she never went to the Mideast willingly, like on vacation, because it was too dangerous.

 

[Faun]

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

Valerie Plame Lied To Voters In Her Very First Campaign Ad

In the ad, Plame suggests she was stationed in Iran and the DPRK, which she was not. She also uses the CIA seal, which is illegal, as use the use of official government seals and logos without permission is restricted by federal law.

LOL

Again, the daily caller is fake news. In no way does she "suggest" she was stationed there. She listed countries she worked in on assignment.

The only time she left the states was when she was on vacation....

Says you, citing yourself. The investigation revealed she worked overseas as a covert CIA operative.

Sucks to be you.

 

[Faun]

Well I said Plame was a covert CIA operative and I proved I was right about that.

We'll just add this to the list of shit you're wrong about.

Valerie Plame Lied To Voters In Her Very First Campaign Ad

In the ad, Plame suggests she was stationed in Iran and the DPRK, which she was not. She also uses the CIA seal, which is illegal, as use the use of official government seals and logos without permission is restricted by federal law.

LOL

Again, the daily caller is fake news. In no way does she "suggest" she was stationed there. She listed countries she worked in on assignment.

The only time she left the states was when she was on vacation....

That is a lie.
To make the WMD sting operation work, she has to go to the Mideast over half a dozen times a year, and she never went to the Mideast willingly, like on vacation, because it was too dangerous.

Poor things. All they have are lies. So what else can they do?

 

[Rigby5]

The long time republican extremist Victoria Toensing who is married to Trump's lawyer?
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
{...
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
Update: Toensing reportedly may also join Trump's legal team

WRITTEN BY MATT GERTZ

PUBLISHED 03/19/18 4:57 PM EDT
...
But beyond that, diGenova’s wife and law partner, Victoria Toensing, who is also a longtime Republican activist and lawyer, is representing a purported “witness” whose claims are at the center of a right-wing media effort to have another special counsel appointed. In theory, this second special counsel would be able to investigate Mueller himself over a shoddily constructed conspiracy theory involving the Russian nuclear energy agency’s 2010 acquisition of Uranium One, a company with licenses to extract U.S. uranium.
...}

How does that matter when she wrote the fucking law, moron?

Because you're incapable of quoting what she said about Plame in regards to that law and you're incapable of posting the law in question.

However, Plame’s government did not betray her. Libby did not leak Plame’s identity as a CIA officer, Richard Armitage did. Armitage and the columnist to whom he leaked, Robert Novak, have both confirmed that.

Dumbfuck, You've been shown repeatedly that Libby leaked her name. That you still can't understand that falls solely on your own G-d given limitations.

How can you "leak" a name that has already become public?

Everyone's name is public, all you have to do is look in a phone book.
It was not the name that mattered, but that Plame was in charge of covert WMD sting in the Mideast.
If a person is a courier, releasing their name is irrelevant.
But if you release that they will be carrying a highly sensitive document that other would kill for, and give a date, time, and place, you will have committed a crime.
See the difference?

 

[Faun]

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

Whereas .... you posted nothing.

Valerie Plame for Congress

LOLOL

You didn't post that, fucking moron. Remember, you proved to be too stupid to post it.

Even better, it destroys your made up nonsense.

 

[Faun]

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

Whereas .... you posted nothing.

“In under 90 seconds Valerie Plame lies to voters, breaks federal law, sweeps her own anti-Semitism under the rug and threatens to use elected office to get revenge on her political enemies. Plame is completely unfit for Congress,” NRCC Spokesman Bob Salera told the Daily Caller.

LOL

So says fake news which you're dumb enough to fall for. I've already pointed out a couple of their lies.

Like their nonsensical claim that Libby didn't leak Plame's identity.

 

[Rigby5]

Dumbfuck, you can't lie your way out of this....

FITZGERALD SAYS PLAME WAS A COVERT AGENT

“She traveled at least seven times to more than 10 countries. When traveling overseas, Ms. Wilson always traveled under a cover identity … At the time of the initial unauthorized disclosure in the media of Ms. Wilson’s employment relationship with the CIA on 14 July 2003, Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for whom the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States.”​

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

Whereas .... you posted nothing.

“In under 90 seconds Valerie Plame lies to voters, breaks federal law, sweeps her own anti-Semitism under the rug and threatens to use elected office to get revenge on her political enemies. Plame is completely unfit for Congress,” NRCC Spokesman Bob Salera told the Daily Caller.

Care to explain how she lied, how she is anti-Semitic, and who she threatened?
It is pretty clear Plame was telling the truth about Iraq not having WMD or being behind the 9/11 attack,and revealing those who did lie and tried to retaliate against her committed treason and should be retaliated against.
It is the law.

 

[Faun]

The long time republican extremist Victoria Toensing who is married to Trump's lawyer?
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
{...
Victoria Toensing, new Trump lawyer Joseph diGenova’s wife, has been trying to use Uranium One to get Mueller investigated
Update: Toensing reportedly may also join Trump's legal team

WRITTEN BY MATT GERTZ

PUBLISHED 03/19/18 4:57 PM EDT
...
But beyond that, diGenova’s wife and law partner, Victoria Toensing, who is also a longtime Republican activist and lawyer, is representing a purported “witness” whose claims are at the center of a right-wing media effort to have another special counsel appointed. In theory, this second special counsel would be able to investigate Mueller himself over a shoddily constructed conspiracy theory involving the Russian nuclear energy agency’s 2010 acquisition of Uranium One, a company with licenses to extract U.S. uranium.
...}

How does that matter when she wrote the fucking law, moron?

Because you're incapable of quoting what she said about Plame in regards to that law and you're incapable of posting the law in question.

However, Plame’s government did not betray her. Libby did not leak Plame’s identity as a CIA officer, Richard Armitage did. Armitage and the columnist to whom he leaked, Robert Novak, have both confirmed that.

Dumbfuck, You've been shown repeatedly that Libby leaked her name. That you still can't understand that falls solely on your own G-d given limitations.

How can you "leak" a name that has already become public?

Fucking moron, repeating lies does not make them true. It doesn't even make them alternative facts.

Again, for the hard of learning...

Transcript of Special Counsel Fitzgerald's Press Conference

"The fact that she was a CIA officer was not well-known" ~ Patrick Fitzgerald, lead investigator​

 

[Rambunctious]

Victoria Toensing wrote the law against revealing the identify of covert agents, and she says Plame didn't qualify.

Your committing the logical fallacy known as the "appeal to authority," and Fitzgerald has a conflict of interest.

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

Whereas .... you posted nothing.

“In under 90 seconds Valerie Plame lies to voters, breaks federal law, sweeps her own anti-Semitism under the rug and threatens to use elected office to get revenge on her political enemies. Plame is completely unfit for Congress,” NRCC Spokesman Bob Salera told the Daily Caller.

LOL

So says fake news which you're dumb enough to fall for. I've already pointed out a couple of their lies.

Like their nonsensical claim that Libby didn't leak Plame's identity.

you are beyond help...a total tool of the establishment swamp...

 

[Faun]

It is obvious to anyone that Victoria Toensing lied.

USA Today again relied only on Toensing to suggest that outing Plame was not a crime
{...
In an October 21 article, USA Today reporters Judy Keen and Mark Memmott relied exclusively on a reading of the law by Republican operative Victoria Toensing in presenting the question of whether senior White House officials may have committed a crime by outing CIA operative Valerie Plame.

The article marked at least the second time that Memmott cited Toensing -- without offering a contrary legal perspective -- in reporting that leaking Plame's identity likely wasn't a crime. Toensing has made frequent media appearances in defense of the Bush administration and the alleged leakers, but she is not the only voice on this issue. Former Nixon White House counsel John W. Dean III argued in 2003 that leaking Plame's identity might constitute a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act and, more recently, that it could also violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, which addresses the theft of information and, Dean wrote, contains “broad language [that] covers leaks” and “has now been used to cover just such actions.”

USA Today did not mention that Toensing is a partisan Republican or that she is a personal friend of syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, who originally outed Plame in July 2003.

The article also misleadingly reported that Novak “hasn't publicly identified his two sources.” In fact, White House senior adviser Karl Rove is known to be one of Novak's two sources, according to reports of Rove's own grand jury testimony.

From the October 21 USA Today article, a series of questions and answers regarding “the latest developments and what might happen next” in the Plame leak investigation:

Q: Is it clear that the original leak most likely came from Rove or [Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” ] Libby?

A: Not at all, but Rove made his fourth grand-jury appearance a week ago, and Miller detailed her conversations with Libby last Sunday. The leak could have originated with someone who hasn't been identified. Names of other administration officials have cropped up in recent news reports, but none is as high-ranking. Columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's name and hasn't publicly identified his two sources. Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus, who did not write about the matter, hasn't publicly named his. Miller wrote that she can't recall who first told her Plame's name.

[...]

Q: What laws would have been broken if someone revealed Plame's identity?

A: The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982 bars anyone authorized to handle classified information about a “covert agent” from knowingly revealing the agent's identity. Lawyer Victoria Toensing, who as a Senate staffer helped write that law, says Plame wasn't covert because she hadn't been stationed overseas since 1997 and worked at CIA headquarters. If Fitzgerald instead is investigating possible violations of the 1917 Espionage Act, Toensing argues that that would be inappropriate. The act makes it illegal to divulge national-security information. Toensing says that law was meant to prevent disclosure of ship routes, munitions plants' locations and other secrets during wartime.
...}

So Toensing did not write that law, but only helped in a junior staff capacity, and she lied by claiming Plame was not stationed over seas since 1997. Clearly Plame traveled to the dangerous zones in the Mideast, over half a dozen times a year.

You're using the notorious liar and convicted felon John Dean as an authority? Really?

Whereas .... you posted nothing.

“In under 90 seconds Valerie Plame lies to voters, breaks federal law, sweeps her own anti-Semitism under the rug and threatens to use elected office to get revenge on her political enemies. Plame is completely unfit for Congress,” NRCC Spokesman Bob Salera told the Daily Caller.

LOL

So says fake news which you're dumb enough to fall for. I've already pointed out a couple of their lies.

Like their nonsensical claim that Libby didn't leak Plame's identity.

you are beyond help...a total tool of the establishment swamp...

LOL

You poor thing. I've shot down your bullshit with reality.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Scooter Libby took responsibility for his crime when he accepted the pardon.

She lies and you swear to it. Good job commie.

.

Presidential pardons come with strings attached, one of those is accepting your guilt for the crime you were convicted of.

Fuck off commie, it was proven Libby didn't do it. And he was never convicted of doing so. The bitch lied, deal with it.

.

He was convicted and ultimately by accepting the pardon agreed to just that. Sorry.

He was railroaded by a kafkaesque corrupt legal system.

In other words just the sort of criminal operation you enjoy.

Exactly

 

[HappyJoy]

She lies and you swear to it. Good job commie.

.

Presidential pardons come with strings attached, one of those is accepting your guilt for the crime you were convicted of.

Fuck off commie, it was proven Libby didn't do it. And he was never convicted of doing so. The bitch lied, deal with it.

.

He was convicted and ultimately by accepting the pardon agreed to just that. Sorry.

He was railroaded by a kafkaesque corrupt legal system.

In other words just the sort of criminal operation you enjoy.

Exactly

He lied to the FBI, sorry. A republican investigated him, a court found him guilty.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Ex-CIA operative, Valerie Plame, running for New Mexico's 3rd district.

What in the hell was that

Tonight on lifetime ..........detective tough woman feelz

 

[Faun]

Ex-CIA operative, Valerie Plame, running for New Mexico's 3rd district.

What in the hell was that

Tonight on lifetime ..........detective tough woman feelz

An ex-CIA operative who's now running for Congress.

 

[Rigby5]

She lies and you swear to it. Good job commie.

.

Presidential pardons come with strings attached, one of those is accepting your guilt for the crime you were convicted of.

Fuck off commie, it was proven Libby didn't do it. And he was never convicted of doing so. The bitch lied, deal with it.

.

He was convicted and ultimately by accepting the pardon agreed to just that. Sorry.

He was railroaded by a kafkaesque corrupt legal system.

In other words just the sort of criminal operation you enjoy.

Exactly

It is obvious that Libby deliberately tried to retaliate against Plame for her work to stop the illegal invasion of Iraq.
Libby told many reporters that Plame was guilty of nepotism by trying to recommend her husband, Ambassador Wilson, for a mission to Niger to investigate uranium claims.
Clearly Libby was deliberately violating the law when he did that, and was trying to get Plame fired.
But the reality is that Plame was actually about the only one telling the truth, that Iraq really had no WMD and that the invasion was illegal. If not for Libby, hundreds of thousands of innocent lives could have been saved.
Essentially Libby is a murderer, hundreds of thousands ot times over.

 

[JustAGuy1]

I guess you may as well lie in your first campaign commercial if you're a commiecrat.

.

Oh? What lie is that?

Outing Valerie Plame. Plame and her husband, Joe Wilson, accused the Bush White House of doing it in retaliation, because her husband was a critic of its war policy. Wilson said it would be “fun to see Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs.” Only one problem: Rove didn’t do it. The State Department’s Richard Armitage did.

https://nypost.com/2014/12/22/outing-valerie-plame/

.

She was outed. And Rove was involved. He just wasn't the only one or the first. There was no lie. She was a covert operative for the CIA until the day Novak's article exposed her.

It was Armitage.

Dumbfuck ... Armitage, Rove AND Libby all leaked her name to the press. Armitage was only the first one to do so.

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Source it or pound sand .

Fuck off Trump Boy

I get it, you're not big on the truth.

I posted the fucking truth, Trump boy. If you were better ionformed, you would fucking know it.

You lied kid, Armitage was the "leaker". You need a better education.

Nope, you're the liar. Armitage was merely the first one to inform the press about Plame. Rove and Libby also informed the press.

Nope, you're the liar your own statement shows that you are parsing words. That's weak lil guy.

 

[Faun]

Oh? What lie is that?

Outing Valerie Plame. Plame and her husband, Joe Wilson, accused the Bush White House of doing it in retaliation, because her husband was a critic of its war policy. Wilson said it would be “fun to see Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs.” Only one problem: Rove didn’t do it. The State Department’s Richard Armitage did.

https://nypost.com/2014/12/22/outing-valerie-plame/

.

She was outed. And Rove was involved. He just wasn't the only one or the first. There was no lie. She was a covert operative for the CIA until the day Novak's article exposed her.

It was Armitage.

Dumbfuck ... Armitage, Rove AND Libby all leaked her name to the press. Armitage was only the first one to do so.

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

Yes, I was wrong. Libby was the first one to leak her name...

Transcript of Special Counsel Fitzgerald's Press Conference

In fact, Mr. Libby was the first official known to have told a reporter when he talked to Judith Miller in June of 2003 about Valerie Wilson.​

 

[Rigby5]

Oh? What lie is that?

Outing Valerie Plame. Plame and her husband, Joe Wilson, accused the Bush White House of doing it in retaliation, because her husband was a critic of its war policy. Wilson said it would be “fun to see Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs.” Only one problem: Rove didn’t do it. The State Department’s Richard Armitage did.

https://nypost.com/2014/12/22/outing-valerie-plame/

.

She was outed. And Rove was involved. He just wasn't the only one or the first. There was no lie. She was a covert operative for the CIA until the day Novak's article exposed her.

It was Armitage.

Dumbfuck ... Armitage, Rove AND Libby all leaked her name to the press. Armitage was only the first one to do so.

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

Wrong.
Armitage only speculated off the cuff, on whether or not Plame was involved in recommending Wilson for the Niger uranium verification trip. He did not know if it was true or not, and he said nothing about Plame being in charge of the WMD sting in the Mideast. So Armitage most definitely was NOT the source of the leak that harmed Plame.