Valerie Plame for Congress

[Rigby5]

Fuck off Trump Boy

I get it, you're not big on the truth.

I posted the fucking truth, Trump boy. If you were better ionformed, you would fucking know it.

You lied kid, Armitage was the "leaker". You need a better education.

Nope, you're the liar. Armitage was merely the first one to inform the press about Plame. Rove and Libby also informed the press.

Nope, you're the liar your own statement shows that you are parsing words. That's weak lil guy.

Wrong.
Armitage had no CIA contacts so knew nothing at all about any CIA WMD sting.
Armitage could not possibly have been the leak.

 

[Rigby5]

Oh? What lie is that?

Outing Valerie Plame. Plame and her husband, Joe Wilson, accused the Bush White House of doing it in retaliation, because her husband was a critic of its war policy. Wilson said it would be “fun to see Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs.” Only one problem: Rove didn’t do it. The State Department’s Richard Armitage did.

https://nypost.com/2014/12/22/outing-valerie-plame/

.

She was outed. And Rove was involved. He just wasn't the only one or the first. There was no lie. She was a covert operative for the CIA until the day Novak's article exposed her.

It was Armitage.

Dumbfuck ... Armitage, Rove AND Libby all leaked her name to the press. Armitage was only the first one to do so.

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

 

[Faun]

Outing Valerie Plame. Plame and her husband, Joe Wilson, accused the Bush White House of doing it in retaliation, because her husband was a critic of its war policy. Wilson said it would be “fun to see Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs.” Only one problem: Rove didn’t do it. The State Department’s Richard Armitage did.

https://nypost.com/2014/12/22/outing-valerie-plame/

.

She was outed. And Rove was involved. He just wasn't the only one or the first. There was no lie. She was a covert operative for the CIA until the day Novak's article exposed her.

It was Armitage.

Dumbfuck ... Armitage, Rove AND Libby all leaked her name to the press. Armitage was only the first one to do so.

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

 

[Rigby5]

She was outed. And Rove was involved. He just wasn't the only one or the first. There was no lie. She was a covert operative for the CIA until the day Novak's article exposed her.

It was Armitage.

Dumbfuck ... Armitage, Rove AND Libby all leaked her name to the press. Armitage was only the first one to do so.

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

And I also do not believe Armitage knew about the Mideast WMD sting, so I think that had to have come from a different leak?

 

[Faun]

It was Armitage.

Dumbfuck ... Armitage, Rove AND Libby all leaked her name to the press. Armitage was only the first one to do so.

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

 

[OKTexas]

Dumbfuck ... Armitage, Rove AND Libby all leaked her name to the press. Armitage was only the first one to do so.

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

 

[Faun]

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

She made no such claim. It's not her fault you are brain-dead.

She said two things about this. Both independent statements.

She said Libby leaked her identity. That is true, he did. She didn't say he was convicted for it, which he wasn't. She didn't say anything about his legal status in regard to the leak or his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Then she said trump pardoned Libby. That too is true. Trump pardoned him last year. She never said trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity. You're just a moron with very limited comprehension abilities.

 

[JustAGuy1]

LOL, lil guy the FIRST one is the ONLY one that matters.

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

Faun is in over his head and he can't seem to stand being shown up.

 

[Faun]

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

Faun is in over his head and he can't seem to stand being shown up.

 

[OKTexas]

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

She made no such claim. It's not her fault you are brain-dead.

She said two things about this. Both independent statements.

She said Libby leaked her identity. That is true, he did. She didn't say he was convicted for it, which he wasn't. She didn't say anything about his legal status in regard to the leak or his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Then she said trump pardoned Libby. That too is true. Trump pardoned him last year. She never said trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity. You're just a moron with very limited comprehension abilities.

Semantics, the last bastion of a loser, the implication was clear. You don't have an intellectually honest bone your body. Evidently she doesn't either.

.

 

[OKTexas]

That is also wrong and foolish because the first leaks do not at all matter if the journalist was honorable and did not publish.
It is only the first published leak that matters, and only Libby's leaks ever got published.

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

Faun is in over his head and he can't seem to stand being shown up.

He's nothing but a commie propagandist. Just a spinner of commie lies.

.

 

[Faun]

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

She made no such claim. It's not her fault you are brain-dead.

She said two things about this. Both independent statements.

She said Libby leaked her identity. That is true, he did. She didn't say he was convicted for it, which he wasn't. She didn't say anything about his legal status in regard to the leak or his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Then she said trump pardoned Libby. That too is true. Trump pardoned him last year. She never said trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity. You're just a moron with very limited comprehension abilities.

Semantics, the last bastion of a loser, the implication was clear. You don't have an intellectually honest bone your body. Evidently she doesn't either.

.

LOLOL

There are no semantics

She made two separate and distinctive claims, both of which are are.

• Libby leaked her identity. True and she never said he was convicted for that in her ad.

• Trump pardoned Libby. Also true

Your inability to comprehend she didn't say Libby was convicted of leaking her identity nor did she say that trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity is no one's problem but yours

 

[Faun]

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

Faun is in over his head and he can't seem to stand being shown up.

He's nothing but a commie propagandist. Just a spinner of commie lies.

.

LOL

Spits the imbecile who proved to be too stupid to understand Plame never said trump pardoned Libby for not being convicted of leaking her identity.

 

[Rigby5]

Here is an excellent video of Plame on the dangers of CIA intel gathering on everyone.

 

[Rigby5]

It was Armitage's leak to Robert Novak which was published. Libby leaked it to Judith Miller who was smarter than Novak and didn't run with it.

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

She made no such claim. It's not her fault you are brain-dead.

She said two things about this. Both independent statements.

She said Libby leaked her identity. That is true, he did. She didn't say he was convicted for it, which he wasn't. She didn't say anything about his legal status in regard to the leak or his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Then she said trump pardoned Libby. That too is true. Trump pardoned him last year. She never said trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity. You're just a moron with very limited comprehension abilities.

Semantics, the last bastion of a loser, the implication was clear. You don't have an intellectually honest bone your body. Evidently she doesn't either.

.

Oh come on now. That is just silly.
Regardless of semantic details, the reality is that Libby deliberately was trying to badmouth Plame to all the press that would listen, because Plame was telling the truth about Iraq not having significant WMD or being involved in any attack on the US, or in fact anything questionable at all. There is no excuse for what Libby was trying to do. And Plame was about the only one trying to do the right thing.

 

[OKTexas]

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

She made no such claim. It's not her fault you are brain-dead.

She said two things about this. Both independent statements.

She said Libby leaked her identity. That is true, he did. She didn't say he was convicted for it, which he wasn't. She didn't say anything about his legal status in regard to the leak or his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Then she said trump pardoned Libby. That too is true. Trump pardoned him last year. She never said trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity. You're just a moron with very limited comprehension abilities.

Semantics, the last bastion of a loser, the implication was clear. You don't have an intellectually honest bone your body. Evidently she doesn't either.

.

LOLOL

There are no semantics

She made two separate and distinctive claims, both of which are are.

• Libby leaked her identity. True and she never said he was convicted for that in her ad.

• Trump pardoned Libby. Also true

Your inability to comprehend she didn't say Libby was convicted of leaking her identity nor did she say that trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity is no one's problem but yours

You stupid fucking hick, she said "his name is Scooter Libby and guess who pardoned him", try watching the lying video again. As I said, the implication was clear.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

Faun is in over his head and he can't seem to stand being shown up.

He's nothing but a commie propagandist. Just a spinner of commie lies.

.

LOL

Spits the imbecile who proved to be too stupid to understand Plame never said trump pardoned Libby for not being convicted of leaking her identity.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Hard to remember, but I think that is correct.
However, attempting to leak to Judith Miller is still just as criminal even if unsuccessful.

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

She made no such claim. It's not her fault you are brain-dead.

She said two things about this. Both independent statements.

She said Libby leaked her identity. That is true, he did. She didn't say he was convicted for it, which he wasn't. She didn't say anything about his legal status in regard to the leak or his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Then she said trump pardoned Libby. That too is true. Trump pardoned him last year. She never said trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity. You're just a moron with very limited comprehension abilities.

Semantics, the last bastion of a loser, the implication was clear. You don't have an intellectually honest bone your body. Evidently she doesn't either.

.

Oh come on now. That is just silly.
Regardless of semantic details, the reality is that Libby deliberately was trying to badmouth Plame to all the press that would listen, because Plame was telling the truth about Iraq not having significant WMD or being involved in any attack on the US, or in fact anything questionable at all. There is no excuse for what Libby was trying to do. And Plame was about the only one trying to do the right thing.

It's revisionist history, as I told the other commie, the implication was clear in the ad. He keeps trying to spin it, that's what commies do.

.

 

[Faun]

Criminality is based on intent and like with Armitage, it was determined Libby did not "knowingly" out her.

But he did indeed leak her identity to the press. Her claim to that in her ad was truthful, despite the looney right trying to claim that was a lie.

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

She made no such claim. It's not her fault you are brain-dead.

She said two things about this. Both independent statements.

She said Libby leaked her identity. That is true, he did. She didn't say he was convicted for it, which he wasn't. She didn't say anything about his legal status in regard to the leak or his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Then she said trump pardoned Libby. That too is true. Trump pardoned him last year. She never said trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity. You're just a moron with very limited comprehension abilities.

Semantics, the last bastion of a loser, the implication was clear. You don't have an intellectually honest bone your body. Evidently she doesn't either.

.

LOLOL

There are no semantics

She made two separate and distinctive claims, both of which are are.

• Libby leaked her identity. True and she never said he was convicted for that in her ad.

• Trump pardoned Libby. Also true

Your inability to comprehend she didn't say Libby was convicted of leaking her identity nor did she say that trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity is no one's problem but yours

You stupid fucking hick, she said "his name is Scooter Libby and guess who pardoned him", try watching the lying video again. As I said, the implication was clear.

.

Your quote is a lie. She didn't say, "and."

You inserted that yourself in a failed attempt to connect the two statements together that were never connevted to begin with.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

 

[OKTexas]

She claimed Libby outed her and Trump pardoned him for it, that was a fucking lie. He was never convicted of outing her. You're trying to play a semantics game, the bitch lied, deal with it.

.

She made no such claim. It's not her fault you are brain-dead.

She said two things about this. Both independent statements.

She said Libby leaked her identity. That is true, he did. She didn't say he was convicted for it, which he wasn't. She didn't say anything about his legal status in regard to the leak or his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Then she said trump pardoned Libby. That too is true. Trump pardoned him last year. She never said trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity. You're just a moron with very limited comprehension abilities.

Semantics, the last bastion of a loser, the implication was clear. You don't have an intellectually honest bone your body. Evidently she doesn't either.

.

LOLOL

There are no semantics

She made two separate and distinctive claims, both of which are are.

• Libby leaked her identity. True and she never said he was convicted for that in her ad.

• Trump pardoned Libby. Also true

Your inability to comprehend she didn't say Libby was convicted of leaking her identity nor did she say that trump pardoned Libby for leaking her identity is no one's problem but yours

You stupid fucking hick, she said "his name is Scooter Libby and guess who pardoned him", try watching the lying video again. As I said, the implication was clear.

.

Your quote is a lie. She didn't say, "and."

You inserted that yourself in a failed attempt to connect the two statements together that were never connevted to begin with.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Deleting the "and" doesn't change the context or implication. Keep on spinning commie loser, keep on spinning.

.