Venezuela’s minister says major power outage likely caused by ‘cyberattack’, points finger at US

[Soupnazi630]

The Grayzone's Max Blumenthal investigated Venezuela's "humanitarian crisis" in a luxury mall in a rich pro-opposition neighborhood, where he looked for the "authoritarian socialism" that Trump and the corporate media talk so much about.

Yes socialist states never set aside privileges for the elite.

 

[the other mike]

Yes socialist states never set aside privileges for the elite.

We can add Venezuela to the list.

 

[Papageorgio]

RT is a Russian TV propaganda site, why on earth would, after 2016 what to even look at Russian propaganda?

 

[the other mike]

 

[the other mike]

RT is a Russian TV propaganda site, why on earth would, after 2016 what to even look at Russian propaganda?

Keep sleepwalking Papa Douchio.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes socialist states never set aside privileges for the elite.

We can add Venezuela to the list.
View attachment 249576

A fictional list made up by radical lefties yes

 

[Papageorgio]

Why does everyone claim Venezuela is socialist? A socialist command economy can simply command economize its way to the first world.

Venezuela is a fuck up, that’s what happens when anybody embraces socialism

it is a federal republic; must be right wing management.

Is there no commander in chief who can simply command a Corps of Engineers to engineer first world solutions to their third world problems?

It is socialism at its best, the elite are rich, and then the poor working class that gets the seconds if there are any left over. It follows the same pattern, no innovation, just want production from the lower working class.

Hugo lived in luxury, the rest of the country, not so much.

 

[danielpalos]

You don't know what you are talking about. Merely appealing to emotion is not very useful.

Government is Socialism. We have a Constitution which limits our use of socialism.

I have stated facts not emotion and it is you who is ignorant as hell about the subject.

Socialism is not any and all government it is a specific form which is always a failure and abominable. Your definition is false and a failure

We have no socialism although it is encroaching and needs to be halted

lousy capitalists worry about "socialism" with our Commerce Clause.

That is not socialism.

Once again you are ignorant as hell about the subject.

Yes, it is. Our social Contract establishes our form of social-ism.

Wrong.

There is no such thing ads a social contract and socialism is a specific form of government not just any form of government.

It does not matter how many times you say otherwise your wish to rewrite the definition is simply a failure and nothing more

You can't appeal to ignorance to plead your special case. Our social Contract is our Constitution which declares our form of social-ism.

 

[danielpalos]

talk is cheap. FDR turned our relative third world economy into the first world economy we have now.

No he did not actually.

yes, he did, actually.

History proves otherwise.

he did not

Hoover Dam is public sector means of production. Right wing bigotry is worthless when you Only have inferior arguments.

Yes and public sector does not mean socialism

Left wing bigotry is as bad or worse

The most inferior arguments are demonstrably false arguments such as arguments like yours where you insist on applying a false definition of socialism

simply resorting to the Other Peoples' money is socialism.

 

[Papageorgio]

RT is a Russian TV propaganda site, why on earth would, after 2016 what to even look at Russian propaganda?

Keep sleepwalking Papa Douchio.

So your rebuttal to a Russain news source is name calling. Great you sure convinced me.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I have stated facts not emotion and it is you who is ignorant as hell about the subject.

Socialism is not any and all government it is a specific form which is always a failure and abominable. Your definition is false and a failure

We have no socialism although it is encroaching and needs to be halted

lousy capitalists worry about "socialism" with our Commerce Clause.

That is not socialism.

Once again you are ignorant as hell about the subject.

Yes, it is. Our social Contract establishes our form of social-ism.

Wrong.

There is no such thing ads a social contract and socialism is a specific form of government not just any form of government.

It does not matter how many times you say otherwise your wish to rewrite the definition is simply a failure and nothing more

You can't appeal to ignorance to plead your special case. Our social Contract is our Constitution which declares our form of social-ism.

It is not a special case and it is you appealing to ignorance.

Sorry but your made up definition is false and that is fact.

The constitution is not a contract nor socialism.

Trying to save face by insisting a false definition is correct is just childish

 

[danielpalos]

Why does everyone claim Venezuela is socialist? A socialist command economy can simply command economize its way to the first world.

Venezuela is a fuck up, that’s what happens when anybody embraces socialism

it is a federal republic; must be right wing management.

Is there no commander in chief who can simply command a Corps of Engineers to engineer first world solutions to their third world problems?

It is socialism at its best, the elite are rich, and then the poor working class that gets the seconds if there are any left over. It follows the same pattern, no innovation, just want production from the lower working class.

Hugo lived in luxury, the rest of the country, not so much.

socialism also about equality. lousy management does that.

 

[danielpalos]

lousy capitalists worry about "socialism" with our Commerce Clause.

That is not socialism.

Once again you are ignorant as hell about the subject.

Yes, it is. Our social Contract establishes our form of social-ism.

Wrong.

There is no such thing ads a social contract and socialism is a specific form of government not just any form of government.

It does not matter how many times you say otherwise your wish to rewrite the definition is simply a failure and nothing more

You can't appeal to ignorance to plead your special case. Our social Contract is our Constitution which declares our form of social-ism.

It is not a special case and it is you appealing to ignorance.

Sorry but your made up definition is false and that is fact.

The constitution is not a contract nor socialism.

Trying to save face by insisting a false definition is correct is just childish

You have no facts. Social-ism is what we are quibbling.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why does everyone claim Venezuela is socialist? A socialist command economy can simply command economize its way to the first world.

Venezuela is a fuck up, that’s what happens when anybody embraces socialism

it is a federal republic; must be right wing management.

Is there no commander in chief who can simply command a Corps of Engineers to engineer first world solutions to their third world problems?

It is socialism at its best, the elite are rich, and then the poor working class that gets the seconds if there are any left over. It follows the same pattern, no innovation, just want production from the lower working class.

Hugo lived in luxury, the rest of the country, not so much.

socialism also about equality. lousy management does that.

Yes the equality of slavery

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is not socialism.

Once again you are ignorant as hell about the subject.

Yes, it is. Our social Contract establishes our form of social-ism.

Wrong.

There is no such thing ads a social contract and socialism is a specific form of government not just any form of government.

It does not matter how many times you say otherwise your wish to rewrite the definition is simply a failure and nothing more

You can't appeal to ignorance to plead your special case. Our social Contract is our Constitution which declares our form of social-ism.

It is not a special case and it is you appealing to ignorance.

Sorry but your made up definition is false and that is fact.

The constitution is not a contract nor socialism.

Trying to save face by insisting a false definition is correct is just childish

You have no facts. Social-ism is what we are quibbling.

Yes I do and socialism is not what you claim it is.

That is fact

 

[danielpalos]

Why does everyone claim Venezuela is socialist? A socialist command economy can simply command economize its way to the first world.

Venezuela is a fuck up, that’s what happens when anybody embraces socialism

it is a federal republic; must be right wing management.

Is there no commander in chief who can simply command a Corps of Engineers to engineer first world solutions to their third world problems?

It is socialism at its best, the elite are rich, and then the poor working class that gets the seconds if there are any left over. It follows the same pattern, no innovation, just want production from the lower working class.

Hugo lived in luxury, the rest of the country, not so much.

socialism also about equality. lousy management does that.

Yes the equality of slavery

a well regulated militia is a form of patriotism not slavery.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it is. Our social Contract establishes our form of social-ism.

Wrong.

There is no such thing ads a social contract and socialism is a specific form of government not just any form of government.

It does not matter how many times you say otherwise your wish to rewrite the definition is simply a failure and nothing more

You can't appeal to ignorance to plead your special case. Our social Contract is our Constitution which declares our form of social-ism.

It is not a special case and it is you appealing to ignorance.

Sorry but your made up definition is false and that is fact.

The constitution is not a contract nor socialism.

Trying to save face by insisting a false definition is correct is just childish

You have no facts. Social-ism is what we are quibbling.

Yes I do and socialism is not what you claim it is.

That is fact

Social-ism is what we are quibbling. You have no facts, only political jargon from a dictionary.

 

[the other mike]

RT is a Russian TV propaganda site, why on earth would, after 2016 what to even look at Russian propaganda?

Keep sleepwalking Papa Douchio.

So your rebuttal to a Russain news source is name calling. Great you sure convinced me.

It gets very tiring hearing these same propaganda points about Russia over and over....not just you, Pippins.

 

[the other mike]

A fictional list made up by radical lefties yes

Blind loyalty isn't patriotism ya nitwit.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.

There is no such thing ads a social contract and socialism is a specific form of government not just any form of government.

It does not matter how many times you say otherwise your wish to rewrite the definition is simply a failure and nothing more

You can't appeal to ignorance to plead your special case. Our social Contract is our Constitution which declares our form of social-ism.

It is not a special case and it is you appealing to ignorance.

Sorry but your made up definition is false and that is fact.

The constitution is not a contract nor socialism.

Trying to save face by insisting a false definition is correct is just childish

You have no facts. Social-ism is what we are quibbling.

Yes I do and socialism is not what you claim it is.

That is fact

Social-ism is what we are quibbling. You have no facts, only political jargon from a dictionary.

Dictionaries provide definitions not political jargon and they prove you wrong.

Now you admit your definition is simply one you made up and a false one