Video shows Ahmaud Arbery Was caught breaking and entering an unfinished property, then towards McMichael‘s house

[Jitss617]

They asked him to stop, until the cops came the hero’s were protect in the neighborhood from this thug

Arbery was the hero.

That’s racist

 

[texmaster]

They asked him to stop, until the cops came the hero’s were protect in the neighborhood from this thug

Arbery was the hero.

LOL And how is this thief a hero? Put down the drink before you answer this one.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Arbery was the hero.

That’s racist

How is it racist?

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

They asked him to stop, until the cops came the hero’s were protect in the neighborhood from this thug

Arbery was the hero.

LOL And how is this thief a hero? Put down the drink before you answer this one.

That's an easy one. He fought for his life while in mortal danger, just like a soldier would.

 

[Jitss617]

They asked him to stop, until the cops came the hero’s were protect in the neighborhood from this thug

Arbery was the hero.

That’s racist

Arbery was the hero.

That’s racist

How is it racist?

you want black men to commit crimes.. it’s democrat policy

 

[Jitss617]

They asked him to stop, until the cops came the hero’s were protect in the neighborhood from this thug

Arbery was the hero.

LOL And how is this thief a hero? Put down the drink before you answer this one.

That's an easy one. He fought for his life while in mortal danger, just like a soldier would.

Who runs towards mortal danger on a “ jog” lol lol

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

you want black men to commit crimes.. it’s democrat policies

That doesn't make any sense, even if there were something to it.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Who runs towards mortal danger on a “ jog” lol lol

A hero. LOL

 

[Jitss617]

you want black men to commit crimes.. it’s democrat policies

That doesn't even make any sense, even if there were something to it.

Aren’t democrats releasing criminals back in to poor black communities? Asking for a friend hehe

 

[Jitss617]

Who runs towards mortal danger on a “ jog” lol lol

A hero. LOL

Lol yea attacking a white hero because your mad your caught isn’t a hero lol

 

[NotfooledbyW]

69#1360 reply to 68#1343

I agree, Arbery shouldn’t had broken the law

If you think the jogger should not have broken the law why do you excuse the white men with guns committing aggravated assault when they attempted to detain a jogger.

your white gun lover prejudice flavors ever y post you write.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

69#1372 reply to 13#256

I see a black manattacking the hero

You can only see the white cap of the gunman through the windshield as the first shot was fired. But you can also see the shadows under the front of the truck. That’s all you can see. So when you say you can see a black man attacking a gun man you are lying.

What you can see on the left side of the road is after the first shot was fired.

That cannot be considered by any sane human being to be an attack by the jogger on someone who had just already fired a shot at him in their continuation of the white man’s aggravated assault on the black jogger.

This is what you can see when the first shot was fired:

 

[beagle9]

64#1279 reply to 64#1278

then aggravated assault.

the white men committed the aggravated assault when they tried to detain an unarmed man who was jogging while black.

the jogger was fired upon first on the right side of the road and in front of the Truck as he was trying to get by.

What happens after that first shot is legally on the white men committing aggravated assault that led to their victim’s death.

^^ Notice how this moron just ignores the fact that homeboy wasn’t jogging at all to begin with. Video shows him WALKING up to the house under construction, stops, looks around, then RUNS up the driveway into the house.

He didn’t start running down the steeet until he saw neighbors calling the police as well as neighbors yelling at him saying they are calling the cops. That’s not “jogging”, it’s fleeing the scene of a crime.

Wrong Bryan was chasing Arbery with his car as two armed men,the McMichaels, waited for him. What you see isn’t Arbery fleeing a crime scene because no crime scene existed. Evidence of nothing being stolen was caught by Mr English’s home security camera. The police said Arbery was unarmed and English said Arbery didn’t steal anything. What did get said according to the police was McMichaels admission that Bryan was helping them catch Arbery.

Let’s recap

No crime was committed

Arbery was unarmed

Arbery was being chased by Bryan in his car while the McMichaels waited in the road with guns leaving Arbery boxed in. That’s Bryan’s felony charge.

Anything at this point that Arbery did was SELF DEFENSE.


If convicted the McMichaels and Bryan could get the death penalty. This is no joke.

How many times do you morons need to be told, NOTHING needed to be taken at the house to make it a crime. Georgia law states that just being in a dwelling without permission with the intent to commit a crime is burglary. He looked around to make sure he wasn’t going to be seen before running into the house, because he knew he was going to break the law. That is on video.

How many times do you have to be told the definition of dwelling?

Definition of dwelling
: a shelter (such as a house) in which people live


NOBODY LIVES THERE. The place barely had walls. It’s property not a dwelling.

The owner installed a camera to alert him if there were trespassers. According to Mr English, the owner, he was well aware there were trespassers.
Was the structure fenced off?

Were there no trespassing signs?

If the owner is aware and does nothing is that a type of permission?

Is trespass punishable by death in Georgia?

Were the McMichaels the owners of the property in question that they knew no permission was granted?

Who are the McMichaels in relationship to the property?

How did the McMichaels and Bryan know that Arbery wasn’t checking in on the property for the owner?

If approached is Arbery required to answer questions posed by people who are not the police?

Is Arbery required by law to justify his presence anywhere in the USA if the people questioning him aren’t the property owner or the police?


The three stooges had no business doing what they did other than to call police and let the professionals handle the situation. Had the police handled this Arbery would be alive and Bryan and the McMichaels would be home with their families right now.

Wrong again idiot. According to Georgia Law, it is irrelevant if the structure is inhabited at the time of burglary.

“
It was an unoccupied building, so technically there was no breaking or entering: Sometimes a defendant will attempt to argue that since the building was vacant, there was not a breaking and entering. However, this defense will not hold up in court as case law has held that even entering a house under construction qualifies as a building and a defendant could still be convicted of burglary. Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957).

I didn't even steal anything: Even though you may not have stolen anything, you could still be convicted of burglary. According to Johnson v. Jackson, it is not necessary that the defendant actually steal anything. 140 Ga. App. 252, (1976). It is enough if they enter without authority and with intent to commit theft.”

Burglary | Georgia Criminal Lawyer

www.georgiacriminallawyer.com

Well then it would seem Georgia is run by paranoid asshats. Glad I don’t live where a person checking out construction can be cornered and killed By two gorillas and a bad bowl cut and legally get away with it. But then again the trial hasn’t started and we will see if your theory holds water if it’s not the homeowner doing the killing and not the homeowner pressing charges, and nobody’s life or property was in any danger. Well see if the homeowner was aware of the trespassing and chose to do nothing gives permission for just anybody to interfere With people visiting the property without the homeowners consent or knowledge. Wonder if the assailants stepped foot on the property themselves? That would mean they too trespassed. But we’ll have to wait and see what video footage turns up at trial. Then of course there’s the legality of the ensuing chase of Arbery and the attempted false imprisonment that led to his death which is actually one of the charges along with felony murder. I got a feeling now that the feds are involved and not the murderers buddies this isn’t going to go well for the three stooges. Can’t wait until the trial.

What if the person "checking out construction" was a violent thief and thug?

Yep, he very well could have been, but they handled it all wrong I think. The courts and investigators will have to figure this one all out for sure. What a mess.

 

[Jitss617]

69#1372 reply to 13#256

I see a black manattacking the hero

You can only see the white cap of the gunman through the windshield as the first shot was fired. But you can also see the shadows under the front of the truck. That’s all you can see. So when you say you can see a black man attacking a gun man you are lying.

What you can see on the left side of the road is after the first shot was fired.

That cannot be considered by any sane human being to be an attack by the jogger on someone who had just already fired a shot at him in their continuation of the white man’s aggravated assault on the black jogger.

This is what you can see when the first shot was fired:View attachment 340050

Dude your still pics still don’t explain why he ran full charge at a man holding a shot gun. If he was going to shot him it would have been from a distance, he shot in self defense..

Just stop with your ridiculous still photos

 

[Jitss617]

64#1279 reply to 64#1278

then aggravated assault.

the white men committed the aggravated assault when they tried to detain an unarmed man who was jogging while black.

the jogger was fired upon first on the right side of the road and in front of the Truck as he was trying to get by.

What happens after that first shot is legally on the white men committing aggravated assault that led to their victim’s death.

^^ Notice how this moron just ignores the fact that homeboy wasn’t jogging at all to begin with. Video shows him WALKING up to the house under construction, stops, looks around, then RUNS up the driveway into the house.

He didn’t start running down the steeet until he saw neighbors calling the police as well as neighbors yelling at him saying they are calling the cops. That’s not “jogging”, it’s fleeing the scene of a crime.

Wrong Bryan was chasing Arbery with his car as two armed men,the McMichaels, waited for him. What you see isn’t Arbery fleeing a crime scene because no crime scene existed. Evidence of nothing being stolen was caught by Mr English’s home security camera. The police said Arbery was unarmed and English said Arbery didn’t steal anything. What did get said according to the police was McMichaels admission that Bryan was helping them catch Arbery.

Let’s recap

No crime was committed

Arbery was unarmed

Arbery was being chased by Bryan in his car while the McMichaels waited in the road with guns leaving Arbery boxed in. That’s Bryan’s felony charge.

Anything at this point that Arbery did was SELF DEFENSE.


If convicted the McMichaels and Bryan could get the death penalty. This is no joke.

How many times do you morons need to be told, NOTHING needed to be taken at the house to make it a crime. Georgia law states that just being in a dwelling without permission with the intent to commit a crime is burglary. He looked around to make sure he wasn’t going to be seen before running into the house, because he knew he was going to break the law. That is on video.

How many times do you have to be told the definition of dwelling?

Definition of dwelling
: a shelter (such as a house) in which people live


NOBODY LIVES THERE. The place barely had walls. It’s property not a dwelling.

The owner installed a camera to alert him if there were trespassers. According to Mr English, the owner, he was well aware there were trespassers.
Was the structure fenced off?

Were there no trespassing signs?

If the owner is aware and does nothing is that a type of permission?

Is trespass punishable by death in Georgia?

Were the McMichaels the owners of the property in question that they knew no permission was granted?

Who are the McMichaels in relationship to the property?

How did the McMichaels and Bryan know that Arbery wasn’t checking in on the property for the owner?

If approached is Arbery required to answer questions posed by people who are not the police?

Is Arbery required by law to justify his presence anywhere in the USA if the people questioning him aren’t the property owner or the police?


The three stooges had no business doing what they did other than to call police and let the professionals handle the situation. Had the police handled this Arbery would be alive and Bryan and the McMichaels would be home with their families right now.

Wrong again idiot. According to Georgia Law, it is irrelevant if the structure is inhabited at the time of burglary.

“
It was an unoccupied building, so technically there was no breaking or entering: Sometimes a defendant will attempt to argue that since the building was vacant, there was not a breaking and entering. However, this defense will not hold up in court as case law has held that even entering a house under construction qualifies as a building and a defendant could still be convicted of burglary. Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957).

I didn't even steal anything: Even though you may not have stolen anything, you could still be convicted of burglary. According to Johnson v. Jackson, it is not necessary that the defendant actually steal anything. 140 Ga. App. 252, (1976). It is enough if they enter without authority and with intent to commit theft.”

Burglary | Georgia Criminal Lawyer

www.georgiacriminallawyer.com

Well then it would seem Georgia is run by paranoid asshats. Glad I don’t live where a person checking out construction can be cornered and killed By two gorillas and a bad bowl cut and legally get away with it. But then again the trial hasn’t started and we will see if your theory holds water if it’s not the homeowner doing the killing and not the homeowner pressing charges, and nobody’s life or property was in any danger. Well see if the homeowner was aware of the trespassing and chose to do nothing gives permission for just anybody to interfere With people visiting the property without the homeowners consent or knowledge. Wonder if the assailants stepped foot on the property themselves? That would mean they too trespassed. But we’ll have to wait and see what video footage turns up at trial. Then of course there’s the legality of the ensuing chase of Arbery and the attempted false imprisonment that led to his death which is actually one of the charges along with felony murder. I got a feeling now that the feds are involved and not the murderers buddies this isn’t going to go well for the three stooges. Can’t wait until the trial.

What if the person "checking out construction" was a violent thief and thug?

Yep, he very well could have been, but they handled it all wrong I think. The courts and investigators will have to figure this one all out for sure. What a mess.

Regardless of anything that happened forget the robbery forget the burglary forget the walking around the dwelling forget running away from it answer this question if I grab your shotgun you’re holding in a intimidating way what are you going to do?

 

[beagle9]

is there anybody here that hasn’t walked into an unfinished house and looked around just to see what’s going on?

Since you ask I would not have run away, but rather stood my ground and called 911

Have you heard stories about black people that were detained by a plain clothes cop and then called the police and the police came and beat up the black person that called the police? I’ve heard that. Even black police officers aren’t immune from getting beat up by white police officers.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/11/30/its-still-blast-beating-people-st-louis-police-indicted-assault-undercover-officer-posing-protester/%3foutputType=amp

Two days later, prosecutors say, that’s exactly what Boone did to one black protester. Boone, 35, and two other officers, Randy Hays, 31, and Christopher Myers, 27, threw a man to the ground and viciously kicked him and beat him with a riot baton, even though he was complying with their instructions.

But the three police officers had no idea that the man was a 22-year police veteran working undercover, whom they beat so badly that he couldn’t eat and lost 20 pounds. On Thursday, a federal grand jury indicted the three officers in the assault. They also indicted the men and another officer, Bailey Colletta, 25, for the attack. Prosecutors released text messages showing the officers bragging about assaulting protesters, with Hays even noting that “going rogue does feel good.”

Let me ask you something, are all black people model citizen's ? Otherwise is it that they never do anything that would create bias and hatred against themselves ????

Ok the same for all White's, are they all good people that create no bias or hatred against themselves ???

The same for Muslims etc ??

If the answer is no, then quit with your blanket stereotyping of races like you do. It will help you look or feel alot wiser in life if you educate yourself, and quit making yourself look dumb or worse looking like a racist yourself.
Every race has it's problems, and some maybe more so than others at times, but it does shift all depending on the generational changes or due to the propaganda ministries, cultural shifts, trends, and political agenda's sought after.

 

[beagle9]

64#1279 reply to 64#1278

then aggravated assault.

the white men committed the aggravated assault when they tried to detain an unarmed man who was jogging while black.

the jogger was fired upon first on the right side of the road and in front of the Truck as he was trying to get by.

What happens after that first shot is legally on the white men committing aggravated assault that led to their victim’s death.

^^ Notice how this moron just ignores the fact that homeboy wasn’t jogging at all to begin with. Video shows him WALKING up to the house under construction, stops, looks around, then RUNS up the driveway into the house.

He didn’t start running down the steeet until he saw neighbors calling the police as well as neighbors yelling at him saying they are calling the cops. That’s not “jogging”, it’s fleeing the scene of a crime.

Wrong Bryan was chasing Arbery with his car as two armed men,the McMichaels, waited for him. What you see isn’t Arbery fleeing a crime scene because no crime scene existed. Evidence of nothing being stolen was caught by Mr English’s home security camera. The police said Arbery was unarmed and English said Arbery didn’t steal anything. What did get said according to the police was McMichaels admission that Bryan was helping them catch Arbery.

Let’s recap

No crime was committed

Arbery was unarmed

Arbery was being chased by Bryan in his car while the McMichaels waited in the road with guns leaving Arbery boxed in. That’s Bryan’s felony charge.

Anything at this point that Arbery did was SELF DEFENSE.


If convicted the McMichaels and Bryan could get the death penalty. This is no joke.

How many times do you morons need to be told, NOTHING needed to be taken at the house to make it a crime. Georgia law states that just being in a dwelling without permission with the intent to commit a crime is burglary. He looked around to make sure he wasn’t going to be seen before running into the house, because he knew he was going to break the law. That is on video.

How many times do you have to be told the definition of dwelling?

Definition of dwelling
: a shelter (such as a house) in which people live


NOBODY LIVES THERE. The place barely had walls. It’s property not a dwelling.

The owner installed a camera to alert him if there were trespassers. According to Mr English, the owner, he was well aware there were trespassers.
Was the structure fenced off?

Were there no trespassing signs?

If the owner is aware and does nothing is that a type of permission?

Is trespass punishable by death in Georgia?

Were the McMichaels the owners of the property in question that they knew no permission was granted?

Who are the McMichaels in relationship to the property?

How did the McMichaels and Bryan know that Arbery wasn’t checking in on the property for the owner?

If approached is Arbery required to answer questions posed by people who are not the police?

Is Arbery required by law to justify his presence anywhere in the USA if the people questioning him aren’t the property owner or the police?


The three stooges had no business doing what they did other than to call police and let the professionals handle the situation. Had the police handled this Arbery would be alive and Bryan and the McMichaels would be home with their families right now.

Wrong again idiot. According to Georgia Law, it is irrelevant if the structure is inhabited at the time of burglary.

“
It was an unoccupied building, so technically there was no breaking or entering: Sometimes a defendant will attempt to argue that since the building was vacant, there was not a breaking and entering. However, this defense will not hold up in court as case law has held that even entering a house under construction qualifies as a building and a defendant could still be convicted of burglary. Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957).

I didn't even steal anything: Even though you may not have stolen anything, you could still be convicted of burglary. According to Johnson v. Jackson, it is not necessary that the defendant actually steal anything. 140 Ga. App. 252, (1976). It is enough if they enter without authority and with intent to commit theft.”

Burglary | Georgia Criminal Lawyer

www.georgiacriminallawyer.com

Well then it would seem Georgia is run by paranoid asshats. Glad I don’t live where a person checking out construction can be cornered and killed By two gorillas and a bad bowl cut and legally get away with it. But then again the trial hasn’t started and we will see if your theory holds water if it’s not the homeowner doing the killing and not the homeowner pressing charges, and nobody’s life or property was in any danger. Well see if the homeowner was aware of the trespassing and chose to do nothing gives permission for just anybody to interfere With people visiting the property without the homeowners consent or knowledge. Wonder if the assailants stepped foot on the property themselves? That would mean they too trespassed. But we’ll have to wait and see what video footage turns up at trial. Then of course there’s the legality of the ensuing chase of Arbery and the attempted false imprisonment that led to his death which is actually one of the charges along with felony murder. I got a feeling now that the feds are involved and not the murderers buddies this isn’t going to go well for the three stooges. Can’t wait until the trial.

What if the person "checking out construction" was a violent thief and thug?

Yep, he very well could have been, but they handled it all wrong I think. The courts and investigators will have to figure this one all out for sure. What a mess.

Regardless of anything that happened forget the robbery forget the burglary forget the walking around the dwelling forget running away from it answer this question if I grab your shotgun you’re holding in a intimidating way what are you going to do?

Hopefully I wouldn't be dumb enough to put myself into that position in life, but if you came onto my property acting fool, and I approach you with my gun drawn in the downward position because of your trespassing agressive actions, then it best you don't attempt anything foolish or make any serious agressive moves (i.e. agressively lunge at me as if you are going to attack me), then it's on. I won't allow you to get within arm's length of me before defending myself if your actions are threatening.

As far as me going out looking for trouble, that's not going to happen, but if trouble comes to me when I wasn't looking for it, then I do have a means of defending myself or the means to help others if they are under attack if it becomes nessesary.

 

[Jitss617]

64#1279 reply to 64#1278

then aggravated assault.

the white men committed the aggravated assault when they tried to detain an unarmed man who was jogging while black.

the jogger was fired upon first on the right side of the road and in front of the Truck as he was trying to get by.

What happens after that first shot is legally on the white men committing aggravated assault that led to their victim’s death.

^^ Notice how this moron just ignores the fact that homeboy wasn’t jogging at all to begin with. Video shows him WALKING up to the house under construction, stops, looks around, then RUNS up the driveway into the house.

He didn’t start running down the steeet until he saw neighbors calling the police as well as neighbors yelling at him saying they are calling the cops. That’s not “jogging”, it’s fleeing the scene of a crime.

Wrong Bryan was chasing Arbery with his car as two armed men,the McMichaels, waited for him. What you see isn’t Arbery fleeing a crime scene because no crime scene existed. Evidence of nothing being stolen was caught by Mr English’s home security camera. The police said Arbery was unarmed and English said Arbery didn’t steal anything. What did get said according to the police was McMichaels admission that Bryan was helping them catch Arbery.

Let’s recap

No crime was committed

Arbery was unarmed

Arbery was being chased by Bryan in his car while the McMichaels waited in the road with guns leaving Arbery boxed in. That’s Bryan’s felony charge.

Anything at this point that Arbery did was SELF DEFENSE.


If convicted the McMichaels and Bryan could get the death penalty. This is no joke.

How many times do you morons need to be told, NOTHING needed to be taken at the house to make it a crime. Georgia law states that just being in a dwelling without permission with the intent to commit a crime is burglary. He looked around to make sure he wasn’t going to be seen before running into the house, because he knew he was going to break the law. That is on video.

How many times do you have to be told the definition of dwelling?

Definition of dwelling
: a shelter (such as a house) in which people live


NOBODY LIVES THERE. The place barely had walls. It’s property not a dwelling.

The owner installed a camera to alert him if there were trespassers. According to Mr English, the owner, he was well aware there were trespassers.
Was the structure fenced off?

Were there no trespassing signs?

If the owner is aware and does nothing is that a type of permission?

Is trespass punishable by death in Georgia?

Were the McMichaels the owners of the property in question that they knew no permission was granted?

Who are the McMichaels in relationship to the property?

How did the McMichaels and Bryan know that Arbery wasn’t checking in on the property for the owner?

If approached is Arbery required to answer questions posed by people who are not the police?

Is Arbery required by law to justify his presence anywhere in the USA if the people questioning him aren’t the property owner or the police?


The three stooges had no business doing what they did other than to call police and let the professionals handle the situation. Had the police handled this Arbery would be alive and Bryan and the McMichaels would be home with their families right now.

Wrong again idiot. According to Georgia Law, it is irrelevant if the structure is inhabited at the time of burglary.

“
It was an unoccupied building, so technically there was no breaking or entering: Sometimes a defendant will attempt to argue that since the building was vacant, there was not a breaking and entering. However, this defense will not hold up in court as case law has held that even entering a house under construction qualifies as a building and a defendant could still be convicted of burglary. Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957).

I didn't even steal anything: Even though you may not have stolen anything, you could still be convicted of burglary. According to Johnson v. Jackson, it is not necessary that the defendant actually steal anything. 140 Ga. App. 252, (1976). It is enough if they enter without authority and with intent to commit theft.”

Burglary | Georgia Criminal Lawyer

www.georgiacriminallawyer.com

Well then it would seem Georgia is run by paranoid asshats. Glad I don’t live where a person checking out construction can be cornered and killed By two gorillas and a bad bowl cut and legally get away with it. But then again the trial hasn’t started and we will see if your theory holds water if it’s not the homeowner doing the killing and not the homeowner pressing charges, and nobody’s life or property was in any danger. Well see if the homeowner was aware of the trespassing and chose to do nothing gives permission for just anybody to interfere With people visiting the property without the homeowners consent or knowledge. Wonder if the assailants stepped foot on the property themselves? That would mean they too trespassed. But we’ll have to wait and see what video footage turns up at trial. Then of course there’s the legality of the ensuing chase of Arbery and the attempted false imprisonment that led to his death which is actually one of the charges along with felony murder. I got a feeling now that the feds are involved and not the murderers buddies this isn’t going to go well for the three stooges. Can’t wait until the trial.

What if the person "checking out construction" was a violent thief and thug?

Yep, he very well could have been, but they handled it all wrong I think. The courts and investigators will have to figure this one all out for sure. What a mess.

Regardless of anything that happened forget the robbery forget the burglary forget the walking around the dwelling forget running away from it answer this question if I grab your shotgun you’re holding in a intimidating way what are you going to do?

Hopefully I wouldn't be dumb enough to put myself into that position in life, but if you came onto my property acting fool, and I approach you with my gun drawn in the downward position because of your actions, then it best you don't attempt anything foolish agressive moves (i.e. agressively lunge at me as if you are going to attack me), then it's on. I won't allow you to get within arm's length of me before defending myself if your actions are threatening.

As far as me going out looking for trouble, that's not going to happen, but if trouble comes to me when I wasn't looking for it, then I do have a means of defending myself or the means to help others if they are under attack if it becomes nessesary.

They were protecting the neighborhood, they wanted justice for the break ins and followed him,, Travis confronted him days before. The owner didn’t want people on his property.

 

[beagle9]

69#1360 reply to 68#1343

I agree, Arbery shouldn’t had broken the law

If you think the jogger should not have broken the law why do you excuse the white men with guns committing aggravated assault when they attempted to detain a jogger.

your white gun lover prejudice flavors ever y post you write.

He might not have been a jogger, so why use that as if he was when you don't know that yet ??

 

[beagle9]

64#1279 reply to 64#1278

then aggravated assault.

the white men committed the aggravated assault when they tried to detain an unarmed man who was jogging while black.

the jogger was fired upon first on the right side of the road and in front of the Truck as he was trying to get by.

What happens after that first shot is legally on the white men committing aggravated assault that led to their victim’s death.

^^ Notice how this moron just ignores the fact that homeboy wasn’t jogging at all to begin with. Video shows him WALKING up to the house under construction, stops, looks around, then RUNS up the driveway into the house.

He didn’t start running down the steeet until he saw neighbors calling the police as well as neighbors yelling at him saying they are calling the cops. That’s not “jogging”, it’s fleeing the scene of a crime.

Wrong Bryan was chasing Arbery with his car as two armed men,the McMichaels, waited for him. What you see isn’t Arbery fleeing a crime scene because no crime scene existed. Evidence of nothing being stolen was caught by Mr English’s home security camera. The police said Arbery was unarmed and English said Arbery didn’t steal anything. What did get said according to the police was McMichaels admission that Bryan was helping them catch Arbery.

Let’s recap

No crime was committed

Arbery was unarmed

Arbery was being chased by Bryan in his car while the McMichaels waited in the road with guns leaving Arbery boxed in. That’s Bryan’s felony charge.

Anything at this point that Arbery did was SELF DEFENSE.


If convicted the McMichaels and Bryan could get the death penalty. This is no joke.

How many times do you morons need to be told, NOTHING needed to be taken at the house to make it a crime. Georgia law states that just being in a dwelling without permission with the intent to commit a crime is burglary. He looked around to make sure he wasn’t going to be seen before running into the house, because he knew he was going to break the law. That is on video.

How many times do you have to be told the definition of dwelling?

Definition of dwelling
: a shelter (such as a house) in which people live


NOBODY LIVES THERE. The place barely had walls. It’s property not a dwelling.

The owner installed a camera to alert him if there were trespassers. According to Mr English, the owner, he was well aware there were trespassers.
Was the structure fenced off?

Were there no trespassing signs?

If the owner is aware and does nothing is that a type of permission?

Is trespass punishable by death in Georgia?

Were the McMichaels the owners of the property in question that they knew no permission was granted?

Who are the McMichaels in relationship to the property?

How did the McMichaels and Bryan know that Arbery wasn’t checking in on the property for the owner?

If approached is Arbery required to answer questions posed by people who are not the police?

Is Arbery required by law to justify his presence anywhere in the USA if the people questioning him aren’t the property owner or the police?


The three stooges had no business doing what they did other than to call police and let the professionals handle the situation. Had the police handled this Arbery would be alive and Bryan and the McMichaels would be home with their families right now.

Wrong again idiot. According to Georgia Law, it is irrelevant if the structure is inhabited at the time of burglary.

“
It was an unoccupied building, so technically there was no breaking or entering: Sometimes a defendant will attempt to argue that since the building was vacant, there was not a breaking and entering. However, this defense will not hold up in court as case law has held that even entering a house under construction qualifies as a building and a defendant could still be convicted of burglary. Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957Smith v. State, 226 Ga App. 9 (1957).

I didn't even steal anything: Even though you may not have stolen anything, you could still be convicted of burglary. According to Johnson v. Jackson, it is not necessary that the defendant actually steal anything. 140 Ga. App. 252, (1976). It is enough if they enter without authority and with intent to commit theft.”

Burglary | Georgia Criminal Lawyer

www.georgiacriminallawyer.com

Well then it would seem Georgia is run by paranoid asshats. Glad I don’t live where a person checking out construction can be cornered and killed By two gorillas and a bad bowl cut and legally get away with it. But then again the trial hasn’t started and we will see if your theory holds water if it’s not the homeowner doing the killing and not the homeowner pressing charges, and nobody’s life or property was in any danger. Well see if the homeowner was aware of the trespassing and chose to do nothing gives permission for just anybody to interfere With people visiting the property without the homeowners consent or knowledge. Wonder if the assailants stepped foot on the property themselves? That would mean they too trespassed. But we’ll have to wait and see what video footage turns up at trial. Then of course there’s the legality of the ensuing chase of Arbery and the attempted false imprisonment that led to his death which is actually one of the charges along with felony murder. I got a feeling now that the feds are involved and not the murderers buddies this isn’t going to go well for the three stooges. Can’t wait until the trial.

What if the person "checking out construction" was a violent thief and thug?

Yep, he very well could have been, but they handled it all wrong I think. The courts and investigators will have to figure this one all out for sure. What a mess.

Regardless of anything that happened forget the robbery forget the burglary forget the walking around the dwelling forget running away from it answer this question if I grab your shotgun you’re holding in a intimidating way what are you going to do?

Hopefully I wouldn't be dumb enough to put myself into that position in life, but if you came onto my property acting fool, and I approach you with my gun drawn in the downward position because of your actions, then it best you don't attempt anything foolish agressive moves (i.e. agressively lunge at me as if you are going to attack me), then it's on. I won't allow you to get within arm's length of me before defending myself if your actions are threatening.

As far as me going out looking for trouble, that's not going to happen, but if trouble comes to me when I wasn't looking for it, then I do have a means of defending myself or the means to help others if they are under attack if it becomes nessesary.

They were protecting the neighborhood, they wanted justice for the break ins and followed him,, Travis confronted him days before. The owner didn’t want people on his property.

It will all come out in the wash, so the best thing for everyone to do is get a wait and see attitude, but yes discuss it as the evidence presents itself more clearly.