Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I see the left is getting their they stole the election talking points ready in case Obama should lose.
Wow, there are 100,000 dependents in that city and/or cities now ???The Republican dominated Pennsylvania legislature has enacted a law requiring voters to show a valid driver's license before they will be permitted to vote. Guess who this affects most in the two major, Pennsylvanisa cities.
Pennsylvania's strict voter ID law faces ACLU lawsuit - latimes.com
Philadelphia and Pittsburgh are predominately Democratic cities. "If the election were held today, we would have more than 100,000 of our voters who could not vote," said Stephanie Singer, chairwoman of Philadelphia's elections commission. "It's a cynical attempt by the Republican leadership to steal the election. And absolutely it could sway the outcome."
The ACLU is challenging this law - and rightly so.
I see the left is getting their they stole the election talking points ready in case Obama should lose.
if another country had all of a sudden changed all the rules about who could vote, we would invade that country to assure honest elections
why do you hate America?
I don't consider having rules that make sure only those who are legally eligible to vote do so is hating America silly me.I see the left is getting their they stole the election talking points ready in case Obama should lose.
if another country had all of a sudden changed all the rules about who could vote, we would invade that country to assure honest elections
why do you hate America?
One wonders.
It is something that should have been done years ago, at least to keep from having what we had with Acorn, along with all of the other voter fraud situations in which has now prompted all this attention to these facts now, and the response there of. This is being done for a good reason, but of course for the lawless & the politically correct clueless in the nation, it is somehow a grave threat? Go figure!I don't consider having rules that make sure only those who are legally eligible to vote do so is hating America silly me.if another country had all of a sudden changed all the rules about who could vote, we would invade that country to assure honest elections
why do you hate America?
One wonders.
It is something that should have been done years ago, at least to keep from having what we had with Acorn, along with all of the other voter fraud situations in which has now prompted all this attention to these facts now, and the response there of. This is being done for a good reason, but of course for the lawless & the politically correct clueless in the nation, it is somehow a grave threat? Go figure!I don't consider having rules that make sure only those who are legally eligible to vote do so is hating America silly me.One wonders.
It is something that should have been done years ago, at least to keep from having what we had with Acorn, along with all of the other voter fraud situations in which has now prompted all this attention to these facts now, and the response there of. This is being done for a good reason, but of course for the lawless & the politically correct clueless in the nation, it is somehow a grave threat? Go figure!I don't consider having rules that make sure only those who are legally eligible to vote do so is hating America silly me.
Nice fiction... given there's no history of voter fraud.....
i suppose the governor of PA was lying when he said the purpose of the voter ID laws was to lead to a Romney victory.
Silly him.
Didnt PA go for obama in 08.. Hey how about those DEMS who tried to steal an election in Troy NY.. Yeah I guess you dont care about that do youThe Republican dominated Pennsylvania legislature has enacted a law requiring voters to show a valid driver's license before they will be permitted to vote. Guess who this affects most in the two major, Pennsylvanisa cities.
Pennsylvania's strict voter ID law faces ACLU lawsuit - latimes.com
Philadelphia and Pittsburgh are predominately Democratic cities. "If the election were held today, we would have more than 100,000 of our voters who could not vote," said Stephanie Singer, chairwoman of Philadelphia's elections commission. "It's a cynical attempt by the Republican leadership to steal the election. And absolutely it could sway the outcome."
The ACLU is challenging this law - and rightly so.
It is something that should have been done years ago, at least to keep from having what we had with Acorn, along with all of the other voter fraud situations in which has now prompted all this attention to these facts now, and the response there of. This is being done for a good reason, but of course for the lawless & the politically correct clueless in the nation, it is somehow a grave threat? Go figure!I don't consider having rules that make sure only those who are legally eligible to vote do so is hating America silly me.
Nice fiction... given there's no history of voter fraud.....
i suppose the governor of PA was lying when he said the purpose of the voter ID laws was to lead to a Romney victory.
Silly him.
It is something that should have been done years ago, at least to keep from having what we had with Acorn, along with all of the other voter fraud situations in which has now prompted all this attention to these facts now, and the response there of. This is being done for a good reason, but of course for the lawless & the politically correct clueless in the nation, it is somehow a grave threat? Go figure!
Nice fiction... given there's no history of voter fraud.....
i suppose the governor of PA was lying when he said the purpose of the voter ID laws was to lead to a Romney victory.
Silly him.
Sorry, there is no evidence of Voter Fraud, because there is no interest in documenting it. If we can't even clean up the Election Process, where are we? Ignoring Voter Fraud is not the solution. PA. Law is fair minded and a step in the right direction. Why defend Chaos?
It is something that should have been done years ago, at least to keep from having what we had with Acorn, along with all of the other voter fraud situations in which has now prompted all this attention to these facts now, and the response there of. This is being done for a good reason, but of course for the lawless & the politically correct clueless in the nation, it is somehow a grave threat? Go figure!
Nice fiction... given there's no history of voter fraud.....
i suppose the governor of PA was lying when he said the purpose of the voter ID laws was to lead to a Romney victory.
Silly him.
Sorry, there is no evidence of Voter Fraud, because there is no interest in documenting it. If we can't even clean up the Election Process, where are we? Ignoring Voter Fraud is not the solution. PA. Law is fair minded and a step in the right direction. Why defend Chaos?
I can't speak for all precincts, but years ago, when I first went online, a group of leftists were yappin' up the night hours at Pathfinder boards (now history) about how each of them voted 12, 20, 30, 40 times, and one said he was a precinct chairman and voted 30 times. These people were from all over the USA. The next morning, I got up to go and print out their claims--all missing. They erased their posts, because one of them was a moderator, and he knew that should not be public domain. I saw and never forgot what they said. It fits that they and their brethren and cisterns (joke) would not care to show a voter id.Why does the left get so bent out of shape over showing a photo I.D. to vote? As I have already pointed out you have to show a photo I.D. to write a check, open a bank account, apply for a credit card, get a bank loan and many other things. Why does showing one for voting get your guts in such a knot?
I can't speak for all precincts, but years ago, when I first went online, a group of leftists were yappin' up the night hours at Pathfinder boards (now history) about how each of them voted 12, 20, 30, 40 times, and one said he was a precinct chairman and voted 30 times. These people were from all over the USA. The next morning, I got up to go and print out their claims--all missing. They erased their posts, because one of them was a moderator, and he knew that should not be public domain. I saw and never forgot what they said. It fits that they and their brethren and cisterns (joke) would not care to show a voter id.Why does the left get so bent out of shape over showing a photo I.D. to vote? As I have already pointed out you have to show a photo I.D. to write a check, open a bank account, apply for a credit card, get a bank loan and many other things. Why does showing one for voting get your guts in such a knot?
The Republican dominated Pennsylvania legislature has enacted a law requiring voters to show a valid driver's license before they will be permitted to vote. Guess who this affects most in the two major, Pennsylvanisa cities.
Pennsylvania's strict voter ID law faces ACLU lawsuit - latimes.com
Philadelphia and Pittsburgh are predominately Democratic cities. "If the election were held today, we would have more than 100,000 of our voters who could not vote," said Stephanie Singer, chairwoman of Philadelphia's elections commission. "It's a cynical attempt by the Republican leadership to steal the election. And absolutely it could sway the outcome."
The ACLU is challenging this law - and rightly so.
Sure it is George.
That is why AZ. passed it's law in 2004 voted by both Repubs and Dems in the state legislature and was signed by A Democratic Governor.
Each and every state who has passed these laws has had a rise in numbers of voter registration.
You are the one who says it's Republicans who are trying to steal the elections, despite evidence that a lot of states have passed this by both parties in the state legislature and court evidence that voter registration fraud has occurred.
Actually, it's the L.A. Times and the ACLU and lots of others who are saying it, not me. I don't judge - I just report.
Nonetheless, it does seem fairly obvious what is going on here with regard to the Pennsylvania legislature.
The Republican dominated Pennsylvania legislature has enacted a law requiring voters to show a valid driver's license before they will be permitted to vote. Guess who this affects most in the two major, Pennsylvanisa cities.
Pennsylvania's strict voter ID law faces ACLU lawsuit - latimes.com
Philadelphia and Pittsburgh are predominately Democratic cities. "If the election were held today, we would have more than 100,000 of our voters who could not vote," said Stephanie Singer, chairwoman of Philadelphia's elections commission. "It's a cynical attempt by the Republican leadership to steal the election. And absolutely it could sway the outcome."
The ACLU is challenging this law - and rightly so.
So what you're saying is Democrats are incompetent and stupid?
I am sure the ACLU has statistics out the gazoo which verify that, de facto, requiring ID prior to voting impacts negatively on far more Demorcratic voters than Republican voters.
No. That is NOT the case. Democrats aren't lacking access to ID cards. If they were, THAT would be a separate issue. Think about it... if there actually were groups of people, who by virtue of race or poverty or party affiliation, were denied access to meaningful participation in the economy, we'd be hearing about it.
In fact, that's ALL we'd be hearing about. These people wouldn't be able to go to the bank, or the doctor, get library cards, access public services... nothing.
This is all about voter fraud and nothing else.
I don't think lack of access is the issue - it is more of a sociological thing. People from the lower walk of life (such as my clients - in case you were not aware, I am a public defender) just don't get (obtain) ID's. They are not as responsible as those who are more fortunate and who have the motivation to get ID's.
My clients - going to a bank (for some reason other than to rob it), going to libraries, accessing public services? Please.
But don't limit it to my clients. In general, people who vote Democratic are more loosely constructed than those who vote Republican, which translartes into we don't have as many ID's per capita as you guys.
You can argue all you want against this fact, but it is a fact that requiring ID's to vote impacts potential Democratic voters more than postential Republican voters. As I said before, if it didn't, Republican legislatures wouldn't be passing such laws. How many Democratically controlled legislatures do you see passing ID's to vote laws, hmmmmm?
Do you mind if I quote you, George?
"They are not as responsible..."
"going to a bank (for some reason other than to rob it)..."
"more loosely constructed..."
In other words, they aren't responsible enough to participate in our system of government.
Sounds like a PERSONAL problem to me...
