Agreed.
It is also senseless to attempt to placate people who will settle for nothing less than the destruction of the American government.
If someone trades in a Lincoln Continental for a much smaller Toyota Camry, what did they destroy? NOTHING is the answer.
Wanting a smaller, less intrusive and less expensive government cannot be considered the destruction of the government.
Trying to bring about a smaller, less intrusive and less expensive government through shutting down the government can hardly be considered productive except by extremists.
Shutting down non-essential government services would wake people up. Unfortunately, the POS we have in the White House gets to pick and choose what gets shut down.
He already stopped school children visits to the White House to save money on couple of Secret Service salaries, but didn't hesitate to spend a few million taxpayers dollars on an African vacation that required several dozen Secret Service people.