OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
- Thread starter
- #241
I refute YOU therefor all your points are refuted.
I count like 12 lies from you in your last 5 posts. You deserve no serious discussion.
Bloviating.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I refute YOU therefor all your points are refuted.
I count like 12 lies from you in your last 5 posts. You deserve no serious discussion.
Walmart collects tens of billions in subsidies,
Prove it.
Wal-Mart Subsidy Watch - brought to you by Good Jobs First
You said the trust had no income, but paid 4%.
I can easily catch your lies. It's not like they're rare.
Yet you keep pushing for laws that do exactly that. You bitch about tax payer money supporting Walmart employees but you want obiecare to give them subsidies for their insurance, you want more food stamps available to more people and on top of that you want higher wages which will accomplish nothing once the price adjustments are made.
Thanks. Now can you at least try to prove your claim?
You said the trust had no income, but paid 4%.
I can easily catch your lies. It's not like they're rare.
Show me.
Thanks. Now can you at least try to prove your claim?
I did. If you have any information that refutes that (which you don't) please post it.
This is where you idiots and your pictures come off the rails. A wage increase would mean 1.1% more at Walmart but the wage increase filters through the entire fucking system not just the end retailer. That means the production cost will increase, transportation, Warehousing etc. So each of them will increase their costs before the product even gets to Walmart. Who then will add another 1.1% on top of all the others adding their increase. Which in the end means your price will go up more like 15-20%. And as an added bonus Walmart becomes much richer since their 1.1% not only covers cost but profit margin.
The family trust (Nevada corporation) paid 4% effective on $26.5M last year.
Your trust paid 4%?
A family trust is 100% expenses. No profit.
With no income?
Yet you keep pushing for laws that do exactly that. You bitch about tax payer money supporting Walmart employees but you want obiecare to give them subsidies for their insurance, you want more food stamps available to more people and on top of that you want higher wages which will accomplish nothing once the price adjustments are made.
How about you left wing assholes stop promoting laws that force employers to have people on welfare through taxation and other regulations? Walmart didn't create this economic environment you did.
The family trust (Nevada corporation) paid 4% effective on $26.5M last year.
Your trust paid 4%?
A family trust is 100% expenses. No profit.
With no income?
Are you really that stupid? Not all expenses are deductible.
Yet you keep pushing for laws that do exactly that. You bitch about tax payer money supporting Walmart employees but you want obiecare to give them subsidies for their insurance, you want more food stamps available to more people and on top of that you want higher wages which will accomplish nothing once the price adjustments are made.
How about you left wing assholes stop promoting laws that force employers to have people on welfare through taxation and other regulations? Walmart didn't create this economic environment you did.
From the guy who thinks Ford didn't accept bailouts!!!!!
The family trust (Nevada corporation) paid 4% effective on $26.5M last year.
Your trust paid 4%?
A family trust is 100% expenses. No profit.
With no income?
Are you really that stupid? Not all expenses are deductible.
Ford didn't want the bailout they saw what was going to happen to GM once the government is picking your CEO's and board members. Obie and his gang of assholes forced them to take some money. They did that and sat on it until they could repay at the earliest date in full. Ford didn't accept a bailout they were forced to take the money.Yet you keep pushing for laws that do exactly that. You bitch about tax payer money supporting Walmart employees but you want obiecare to give them subsidies for their insurance, you want more food stamps available to more people and on top of that you want higher wages which will accomplish nothing once the price adjustments are made.
How about you left wing assholes stop promoting laws that force employers to have people on welfare through taxation and other regulations? Walmart didn't create this economic environment you did.
From the guy who thinks Ford didn't accept bailouts!!!!!
And did your company give any to charity? Did your company help and hire low wage earners to work for you? How much did you give to charity? Did you pay more in taxes than you had to?
If you believe in your own BS 4.5 million more should have went to all these other things. If you are going to be at 10 million, then you should be providing more jobs than you are. Your net should only be one million.
That's according to your BS, and your claims to want to help the middle class and the poor.
You like I have been saying all along, are greedy and no better than the rich you criticize.
More bloviating.
Walmart collects tens of billions in subsidies, then pays their employees so little they qualify for welfare.
You and yours think that is good.
The family trust (Nevada corporation) paid 4% effective on $26.5M last year.
Your trust paid 4%?
A family trust is 100% expenses. No profit.
With no income?
Are you really that stupid? Not all expenses are deductible.
By all means, go into more detail.
Enough detail to prove you weren't really lying.
If you are itemizing deductions and you have an "expense" that isn't deductible, it isn't really an expense.
For instance, our restaurant caters. We deduct mileage , so therefor our fuel expenses are not really an expense as far as the IRS is concerned.
If you are itemizing deductions and you have an "expense" that isn't deductible, it isn't really an expense.
For instance, our restaurant caters. We deduct mileage , so therefor our fuel expenses are not really an expense as far as the IRS is concerned.
But you can deduct state and local taxes.
Ford didn't want the bailout they saw what was going to happen to GM once the government is picking your CEO's and board members. Obie and his gang of assholes forced them to take some money. They did that and sat on it until they could repay at the earliest date in full. Ford didn't accept a bailout they were forced to take the money.Yet you keep pushing for laws that do exactly that. You bitch about tax payer money supporting Walmart employees but you want obiecare to give them subsidies for their insurance, you want more food stamps available to more people and on top of that you want higher wages which will accomplish nothing once the price adjustments are made.
How about you left wing assholes stop promoting laws that force employers to have people on welfare through taxation and other regulations? Walmart didn't create this economic environment you did.
From the guy who thinks Ford didn't accept bailouts!!!!!
Now that is taken care of you mind putting your tiny little mind to work on an actual reply to my post?
Ford did receive $5.9 billion in government loans in 2009 to retool its manufacturing plants to produce more fuel-efficient cars, and the company lobbied for and benefited from the cash-for-clunkers program — contrary to the ad’s testimonial that Ford is “standing on their own.”