Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a terrible case, particularly for society and even more so for the child.
Nonetheless, child predation is much higher in cult like Christian reactionary groups than in society as a whole.
Most child molesters in fact are heterosexuals.
Many experts now view pedophilia as a sexual orientation [Google+ hangout] - latimes.com
A blog on the LA times with several people commenting is some how "many experts".
Let's have some real evidence, please.
I agree that sex perverts who prey on children, from progressives to regressives and particularly so-called Christians, who are supposed to protect and nurture children, should be removed from the face of the earth.
nobody asked you what you thought, fake. And nobody cares.
Sorry, princess: you will be held accountable for your comments. We all agree that pedophiles, whoever they are, should be removed. Pedophiles are primarily heterosexuals who come from all religious and non-religious as well as all political and non-political backgrounds.
These are facts. Among those facts, many pedophiles come from mainstream churches and religious cults.
Why is that? Because predators, whether pedophiles or cats, hunt where the prey is.
Nope, progressives aren't interested in preying upon children. Not at all:
"Earlier this week we talked about the shocking case out in Wyoming Montana where a 49 year old school teacher, Stacey Rambold, received a thirty day jail sentence for raping a 14 year old student who later killed herself."
"But against all belief, Betsy seems to think that the sentence Rambold received was a bit too harsh.
Sex between students and teachers should not be a crime
our society needs to have an uncensored dialogue about the reality of sex in schools.
As protesters decry the leniency of Rambolds sentence he will spend 30 days in prison after pleading guilty to raping 14-year-old Cherice Morales, who committed suicide at age 16 I find myself troubled for the opposite reason. I dont believe that all sexual conduct between underage students and teachers should necessarily be classified as rape, and I believe that absent extenuating circumstances, consensual sexual activity between teachers and students should not be criminalized. While I am not defending Judge G. Todd Baughs comments about Morales being as much in control of the situation for which he has appropriately apologized tarring and feathering him for attempting to articulate the context that informed his sentence will not advance this much-needed dialogue."
"This wasnt some Romeo and Juliette situation where we need to dance around the difficult questions of young people engaging in sex too early with their Main Squeeze after one of them barely passes the age of adulthood. This teacher is a middle aged pedophile, plain and simple. Does that sound judgmental and harsh? Good. Because thats the name we give to older men (or women in some cases) who have sex with children. And that 14 year old was a child, no matter how old she may have acted."
Wapo editorial: Maybe we should just let teachers rape students « Hot Air
Sex between students and teachers should not be a crime - The Washington Post
WaPo editorial...Maybe we should just let teachers rape students.
The point is that there is a vast and extremely nuanced continuum of sexual interactions involving teachers and students, ranging from flirtation to mutual lust to harassment to predatory behavior. Painting all of these behaviors with the same brush sends a damaging message to students and sets the stage for hypocrisy and distortion of the truth.
Laws related to statutory rape are in place to protect children, but the issue of underage sex, and certainly of sex between students and teachers, may be one in which the law of unintended consequences is causing so much damage that society needs to reassess.
Search: Threads Started By: JakeStarkeyYour threads do poorly in comparison to most others.
I was trying to give it a bump for you, but even that failed.
I will leave you to it then to sit in silence.
WaPo editorial...Maybe we should just let teachers rape students.
As usual youre a liar.
Nowhere in the article does the author advocate teachers raping students. Nowhere in the article is the author identified as a 'progressive,' or someone speaking for 'progressives.'
Indeed, the author considers the fact that indiscriminate prosecution often ends up being unintentionally harmful to the persons the laws are attempting to protect:
The articles author also acknowledges the appropriateness of statutory rape doctrine, and offers that the utilization of such laws may not be desirable in all cases:The point is that there is a vast and extremely nuanced continuum of sexual interactions involving teachers and students, ranging from flirtation to mutual lust to harassment to predatory behavior. Painting all of these behaviors with the same brush sends a damaging message to students and sets the stage for hypocrisy and distortion of the truth.
Calling for a review and reassessment of how statutory rape laws are implemented in certain circumstances is reasonable, and again, in no way suggests that teachers should be allowed to rape students with impunity.Laws related to statutory rape are in place to protect children, but the issue of underage sex, and certainly of sex between students and teachers, may be one in which the law of unintended consequences is causing so much damage that society needs to reassess.