- Dec 5, 2010
- 99,090
- 35,397
- 2,290
.....And, the 1%ers' kids are free to pursue THEIR future!!
Of course they are. You are saying nothing in response.
![eusa_shhh :eusa_shhh: :eusa_shhh:](/styles/smilies/eusa_shhh.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.....And, the 1%ers' kids are free to pursue THEIR future!!
It was CATHOLICS who were Nazis.
So, an early affiliation that he had allows you to turn "Catholicism" into Nazis?
False dilemma - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No..but people who were catholic have done bad things under the banner of religion. Same with jewish people. Same with muslim people. Same with hindi people. Same with buddhist people. Same with practically every religion ever known to man.
Alright, it seems that people on here are more focused on making individual points that collaborating on a hypothetical solution. Here's what I suggest, we, as a random assortment of online thoughts/ideas, come together and create a possible "solution" to the Iran. I honestly do not care what solution we come to, whether it be nuke the shit out of them or develop everlasting peace with them until the end of humanity. Do not care. That being said, I shall start in hopes that others shall join. If the US/Israel does not militarily strike Iran, then how should they go about handling the Iranian "threat"?
So what is your security clearance level? You claim to know so much about what is going on inside Iran, more than the CIA, Israel, England, etc.
Hmmmm, why did Obamination push for EPAA? Come on, you know sooooooo much.
LOL, Iran couldn't produce a 15 kiloton atomic weapon right now even if they tried much less deliver it to a target in "big" or "little" satan.
You should cease being an insolent little punk because there would be more dignity in it, just saying.
Your security clearance is insignificant in this debate. I can't count the retards I know on 10 hands with security clearance in or outside the military. It's not as if you have accessed secret files that would give you 1 iota of a clue. Hint: People with a clue don't counter an argument with "dumbfuck" or "please kill yourself". Just saying.
Yes, Lebanon will attack Israel. Not so much as the "Official Lebanese" military but the proxy of Iran and all other Muslim militant groups again Israel/US/NATO will attack. If they didn't, after a presumed Israeli/USA strike against Iran, I would be very, very surprised. Even if not able to anihilate the Jewish state in a manner that they would like, they, along with other proxy groups such as Hezzbolah and the PA, would seek to undermine as much as they can when it came to future Israeli/US attacks against Iran after the intitial strike. Egypt, they would unite with whatever sect of Muslim, as long as that sect became the winner. Egypt is not as hostile nor as influential as people would make it seem. Their influence is limited to the Sunni, which is the majority of all Muslims, compared to Sunni, which is the ideaology of Iran and her followers. If Iran doesn't give up it's resistance, Israel should attack what it perceieves as it's National Interest. Howerver, as I have said previously, the United States should remain nuetral throughout the conflict so as to become, once again, the worlds arms dealer/creditor.
Works for me. Amazing that Israel is a lone outpost of Liberty in a sea Islamist theocracies....why wouldn't WE support thier cause?Alright, it seems that people on here are more focused on making individual points that collaborating on a hypothetical solution. Here's what I suggest, we, as a random assortment of online thoughts/ideas, come together and create a possible "solution" to the Iran. I honestly do not care what solution we come to, whether it be nuke the shit out of them or develop everlasting peace with them until the end of humanity. Do not care. That being said, I shall start in hopes that others shall join. If the US/Israel does not militarily strike Iran, then how should they go about handling the Iranian "threat"?
hmmmm
How about we stop dicking with them at every opportunity?
"Israels foreign minister on Wednesday said it's not the business of the United States whether his country decides to attack Iran.
Foreign Minister Avigor Lieberman said that warnings from the United States and Russia about an attack would not affect Israels decision-making."
Unless Iran does something really stupid, there is no reason for us to become involved in another conflict. Besides that, a very large percentage of Iran, maybe even the majority, wants change and will eventually bring that change on their own. Killing thousands of innocents in another conflict would not help us in the long run.The LAST thing we need, is a reimplementation o' the BUSH DOCTRINE; preemptive WAR.
It'd (merely) instigate the younger-people, in Iran, to become a nationalistic-insurgency....just like Lil' Dumbya created in Iraq.
Iran is having their (own) '60s.....against their (own) "conservatives"/religious-fanatics.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXCgHLX4Zi8]Another Revolution In IRAN - YouTube[/ame]
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djs5Ux0Sk0s]Underground Teens In Iran - YouTube[/ame]
*
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6JPosCyCho]Iranian Youth Ditch Oppressive Islam - YouTube[/ame]
It's not like we don't have our OWN problems, presently!!!!
.....as OFTEN as I AM.
"Dagan says the best solution is to push the mullahs out by supporting Iranian students and minorities. According to a leaked State Department cable, he told his American counterparts as early as 2007, more should be done to foment regime change.
Dagan: It's our duty to help anyone who likes to present an open opposition against their regime in Iran.
Stahl: Has Israel done anything to encourage, help, support the youth opposition groups that have been marching against the regime?
Dagan: Let's ignore the question.
Dagan argues that a preemptive Israeli strike this year would be reckless and irresponsible."