Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong.I find it funny people are saying Oswalt would have been nervous. Why? He had practiced, nobody was shooting back at him and he was ready.
He was calm as a cumumber.
Well of course, you are entitled to your opinion but the reality of the situation is simply this:
There is no proof that Oswald fired the rifle, there is no credible motive for Oswald to shoot JFK....it would be logical for Oswald to be the one that fired a shot a General Walker since Oswald was an avowed marxist....but there is no proof he even did that....eyewitness testimony says there were 2 guys and neither one looked like oswald.
From all the information available....it appears Oswald's claim of just being a patsy is very probable.
He may have been an un-witting accessory as in he may have let someone use the rifle...if he still had it at that time. No proof he actually was in possesion of the rifle at that time...he could have sold it, given it to some of his compadres or whatever.
The Warren commission in a failed effort to convice the American People that Oswald was just a lone nut who shot the President for no real reason made a lot of guesses.....it was their theory that oswald was just a lone nut...that is all--just a theory.
There is overwhelming evidence he shot Kennedy and none challenging that fact.
You are will fully denying that fact
Wrong.I find it funny people are saying Oswalt would have been nervous. Why? He had practiced, nobody was shooting back at him and he was ready.
He was calm as a cumumber.
Well of course, you are entitled to your opinion but the reality of the situation is simply this:
There is no proof that Oswald fired the rifle, there is no credible motive for Oswald to shoot JFK....it would be logical for Oswald to be the one that fired a shot a General Walker since Oswald was an avowed marxist....but there is no proof he even did that....eyewitness testimony says there were 2 guys and neither one looked like oswald.
From all the information available....it appears Oswald's claim of just being a patsy is very probable.
He may have been an un-witting accessory as in he may have let someone use the rifle...if he still had it at that time. No proof he actually was in possesion of the rifle at that time...he could have sold it, given it to some of his compadres or whatever.
The Warren commission in a failed effort to convice the American People that Oswald was just a lone nut who shot the President for no real reason made a lot of guesses.....it was their theory that oswald was just a lone nut...that is all--just a theory.
There is overwhelming evidence he shot Kennedy and none challenging that fact.
You are will fully denying that fact
Maybe but she never bothered.Is there a lawyer in the house?
Can a federal commission legally convict someone of murder who is dead and thus unable to defend himself?
Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Much like the family of all Capone never sued for him being labeled a criminal.
He was never convicted of a violent crime wither but the evidence is clear he was guilty of several violent crimes.
Is there a lawyer in the house?
Can a federal commission legally convict someone of murder who is dead and thus unable to defend himself?
Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Sure, but if there was enough evidence to show the statement was not false, she would fail in her effort to prove slander.
Is there a lawyer in the house?
Can a federal commission legally convict someone of murder who is dead and thus unable to defend himself?
Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Sure, but if there was enough evidence to show the statement was not false, she would fail in her effort to prove slander.
He was accused of murder....no evidence whatsoever that he actually comitted murder....that was just their opinion or more specifically....their mission to convince the public oswald was just a lone nut case who just suddenly for no reason decided to shoot the President.
Not a violent oneMaybe but she never bothered.Is there a lawyer in the house?
Can a federal commission legally convict someone of murder who is dead and thus unable to defend himself?
Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Much like the family of all Capone never sued for him being labeled a criminal.
He was never convicted of a violent crime wither but the evidence is clear he was guilty of several violent crimes.
He went to prision for income tax evasion which is a crime.
Not a violent oneMaybe but she never bothered.Is there a lawyer in the house?
Can a federal commission legally convict someone of murder who is dead and thus unable to defend himself?
Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Much like the family of all Capone never sued for him being labeled a criminal.
He was never convicted of a violent crime wither but the evidence is clear he was guilty of several violent crimes.
He went to prision for income tax evasion which is a crime.
He was never convicted of a violent crime
Really ? So we cannot say Al Capone ever killed anyoneA? And we can not say Hitler ever committed genocide?Not a violent oneMaybe but she never bothered.Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Much like the family of all Capone never sued for him being labeled a criminal.
He was never convicted of a violent crime wither but the evidence is clear he was guilty of several violent crimes.
He went to prision for income tax evasion which is a crime.
He was never convicted of a violent crime
One is not guilty unless under the law unless he has been convicted by a court.
Is there a lawyer in the house?
Can a federal commission legally convict someone of murder who is dead and thus unable to defend himself?
Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Sure, but if there was enough evidence to show the statement was not false, she would fail in her effort to prove slander.
He was accused of murder....no evidence whatsoever that he actually comitted murder....that was just their opinion or more specifically....their mission to convince the public oswald was just a lone nut case who just suddenly for no reason decided to shoot the President.
Is there a lawyer in the house?
Can a federal commission legally convict someone of murder who is dead and thus unable to defend himself?
Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Sure, but if there was enough evidence to show the statement was not false, she would fail in her effort to prove slander.
Back at that time before the Warren Commission become generaly recognized as b.s. a jury would probably not have awarded her anything.....but now with all the new material, books etc. I think his daughter should sue and would very likely get a huge,huge award.
Really ? So we cannot say Al Capone ever killed anyoneA? And we can not say Hitler ever committed genocide?Not a violent oneMaybe but she never bothered.Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Much like the family of all Capone never sued for him being labeled a criminal.
He was never convicted of a violent crime wither but the evidence is clear he was guilty of several violent crimes.
He went to prision for income tax evasion which is a crime.
He was never convicted of a violent crime
One is not guilty unless under the law unless he has been convicted by a court.
Bullet went straight and true. There was a “magic” fold down jump seat that Connally was sitting in. That seat was down and to the rightYes I do know what it is and you are wrong.This has been done to deathJFK ASSASSINATION, SOME OF THE HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS (HSCA) CONCLUSIONS ON THE WARREN REPORT:
Warren Commissions FAILURES and PROBLEMS IN THE investigation OF the jfk kennedy assassination Grand Subversion.
The Warren Report was little more than the capstone to a deceptive and shoddily improvised exercise in public relations designed to "prove" that Oswald had acted alone.
The Commission's own documents and collected testimony—as well as thousands of other items it never saw, refused to see, or actively suppressed—reveal two conspiracies: the still very murky one surrounding the assassination itself and the official one that covered it up. The cover-up actually began, within days of Kennedy's death, when President Johnson, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, and acting Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach all agreed that any official investigation must reach only one conclusion: Oswald acted alone.
Both CIA and FBI photo analysis of the Zapruder film concluded that the first shot could not have been fired from the sixth floor.
Based on more than a quarter-million pages of government documents and, for the first time ever, the 50,000 file cards in the
The Commission's evidence was never able to place Oswald at the "sniper's nest" on the sixth floor at the time of the shooting.
JFK's official death certificate, signed by his own White House physician and contradicting the Commission's account of Kennedy's wounds, was left out of the official record.
The dissenting views of the naval doctors who performed the autopsy and those of the government's best ballistic experts were kept out of the official report.
The Commission's tortuous "Single Bullet" or "Magic Bullet" theory has finally and convincingly been dismantled.
JFK single-gunman theory shot down by science
The hsca based their conclusion on aucustic evidence which has since been proven false
Without that evidence they have no challenge to the Warren commission report which still stands true
The magic bullet theory was invented by conspiracy theorists and has been proven false.
Do you even know what the magic bullet theory was??? Certainly not invented by the so called conspiracy theorists....they are the ones who dubunked it. You sound very coinfused.
Ten Reasons I Reject The Single-Bullet Theory
It is you who are confused like most conspiracy theorist
So let me explain carefully
The magic bullet theory postulates that the government tried to snow people by claiming that a bullet zig zagged, reversed course, changed direction and paused in mid air.
The theory is NOT about the bullet or a bullet. The theory is about what the Warren commission wrote and reported about the bullet.
It is about a government statement
The problem is the theory is proven false and debunked because the Warren commission never made any such claim
They never described a bullet acting magically or even implied it
You are wrong. The theory was invented by conspiracy theorists and it is proven false.
What you do not get is that in order for the bullet to do all the things that the Warren commision claimed it would have had to have been a magical bullet....they in essence were saying it was a magical bullet....got dat?
All this clear proof of conspiracy posted in this thread, and yet the Langley Nazi and the other statists cling to the fairy tale that is the WC.
Can’t fix stupid.
JFK ASSASSINATION, SOME OF T
The Warren Report was little more than the capstone to a deceptive and shoddily improvised exercise in public relations designed to "prove" that Oswald had acted alone.
The Commission's own documents and collected testimony—as well as thousands of other items it never saw, refused to see, or actively suppressed—reveal two conspiracies: the still very murky one surrounding the assassination itself and the official one that covered it up. The cover-up actually began, within days of Kennedy's death, when President Johnson, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, and acting Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach all agreed that any official investigation must reach only one conclusion: Oswald acted alone.
Both CIA and FBI photo analysis of the Zapruder film concluded that the first shot could not have been fired from the sixth floor.
Based on more than a quarter-million pages of government documents and, for the first time ever, the 50,000 file cards in the
The Commission's evidence was never able to place Oswald at the "sniper's nest" on the sixth floor at the time of the shooting.
JFK's official death certificate, signed by his own White House physician and contradicting the Commission's account of Kennedy's wounds, was left out of the official record.
The dissenting views of the naval doctors who performed the autopsy and those of the government's best ballistic experts were kept out of the official report.
The Commission's tortu
JFK single-gunman theory shot down by science
[/Q
Is there a lawyer in the house?
Can a federal commission legally convict someone of murder who is dead and thus unable to defend himself?
Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Sure, but if there was enough evidence to show the statement was not false, she would fail in her effort to prove slander.
He was accused of murder....no evidence whatsoever that he actually comitted murder....that was just their opinion or more specifically....their mission to convince the public oswald was just a lone nut case who just suddenly for no reason decided to shoot the President.
He was accused of murder...the report is full of the evidence that he was the one that committed the murder. Their opinion was backed up by evidence, which is why no one from the Oswald family ever sued. Their mission was to investigate the assassination and determine who committed the crime. They fulfilled that mission.
Who claims Connolly was shot from the Grassy Knoll? It's a cheap common trick of people that lie to invent claims that were never made so they canBullet went straight and true. There was a “magic” fold down jump seat that Connally was sitting in. That seat was down and to the right
Want to talk magic shots?
How does someone shooting from the grassy knoll hit Connally in the upper thigh?
Why try a dead man?Only a court can CONVICT someone of murder. A federal commission can investigate a murder and show that the evidence points to one conclusion, but that is not a conviction under the law.
Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Sure, but if there was enough evidence to show the statement was not false, she would fail in her effort to prove slander.
He was accused of murder....no evidence whatsoever that he actually comitted murder....that was just their opinion or more specifically....their mission to convince the public oswald was just a lone nut case who just suddenly for no reason decided to shoot the President.
He was accused of murder...the report is full of the evidence that he was the one that committed the murder. Their opinion was backed up by evidence, which is why no one from the Oswald family ever sued. Their mission was to investigate the assassination and determine who committed the crime. They fulfilled that mission.
A prominent lawyer, Mark Lane proposed to the Commission that he represent Oswald during the hearings. Hired by Oswald's mother, Lane hoped to cross examine witnesses to assure the accused got a trial [since Oswald would never be given a formal trial, due to his murder by Jack Ruby] . The seven member presidential commission under the guidance of Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Earl Warren, refused Lane's request.
Warren Commission got it rightThe Warren Commission Report: A botched invetigation
Initially the decision by President Johnson ... was to leave this to the city and the country and state officials in Texas to deal with. He didn't want, as he put it, "carpetbaggers" going into his home state of Texas to run this investigation, but very clearly in the days that followed there were so many wild theories offered about who was really responsible for the assassination that Johnson decided that he had to have some kind of federal investigation. Among those rumors were rumors that Johnson himself was somehow linked to the assassination, and very quickly, President Johnson settles on Chief Justice Earl Warren, who he sees as this ultimate symbol of integrity to run the investigation.
Very early on, I mean, within 48 hours of the assassination, FBI Director Jay Edgar Hoover determines, in his own mind, that Oswald acted alone, there was no conspiracy, there's not much to investigate here. And the FBI within two weeks produces this 400-page report which is supposedly a thorough review of all that is known about the assassination and about Oswald. The commission looks over the report and sees how inadequate it is and how, in many ways, incompetent the FBI investigation is and then moves on with a much more thorough investigation of its own.
Botched Investigation Fuels Kennedy Conspiracy Theories
Why try a dead man?Would the fact that the Warren Commision labeled Oswald the killer of JFK not entitled his mother to sue for libel, slander or whatever?
Sure, but if there was enough evidence to show the statement was not false, she would fail in her effort to prove slander.
He was accused of murder....no evidence whatsoever that he actually comitted murder....that was just their opinion or more specifically....their mission to convince the public oswald was just a lone nut case who just suddenly for no reason decided to shoot the President.
He was accused of murder...the report is full of the evidence that he was the one that committed the murder. Their opinion was backed up by evidence, which is why no one from the Oswald family ever sued. Their mission was to investigate the assassination and determine who committed the crime. They fulfilled that mission.
A prominent lawyer, Mark Lane proposed to the Commission that he represent Oswald during the hearings. Hired by Oswald's mother, Lane hoped to cross examine witnesses to assure the accused got a trial [since Oswald would never be given a formal trial, due to his murder by Jack Ruby] . The seven member presidential commission under the guidance of Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Earl Warren, refused Lane's request.
