Was Adam really the first human and if so...

[ding]

Don’t tell me what it didn’t say. Tell me what the link did say.

Total speculation. Burckle Crater - Wikipedia

The total speculation is your take.

You are literally arguing against what the link says.

You're an idiot. Where does it say anything about a 40 days worldwide flood?

It provides the mechanism that supports the legend recorded by ancient civilizations.

They didn’t have CNN back in those days.

No wonder you don't provide links, you don't know what they say.

It wouldn’t matter if I did because you would just ignore it.

 

[ding]

No. That’s my way of telling you how they passed down history and lessons 6000 years ago.

So you claim it's history now, not allegorical?

Both. That’s how they passed down information 6000 years ago.

So both, so it's history that there was a 40 day flood that covered everything?

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

 

[ding]

Taz you argue like a child.

 

[Taz]

So you claim it's history now, not allegorical?

Both. That’s how they passed down information 6000 years ago.

So both, so it's history that there was a 40 day flood that covered everything?

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

 

[ding]

Both. That’s how they passed down information 6000 years ago.

So both, so it's history that there was a 40 day flood that covered everything?

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

 

[Taz]

So both, so it's history that there was a 40 day flood that covered everything?

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

I dismiss it (and you) because no real scientist agrees with you. otherwise you'd have a link.

 

[ding]

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

I dismiss it (and you) because no real scientist agrees with you. otherwise you'd have a link.

How do YOU explain the fact that every major civilization has an account of a major flood?

 

[hobelim]

So both, so it's history that there was a 40 day flood that covered everything?

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

Some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible and hints at part of the reason why at that point in time many people all over the world came to believe that there was an angry God up there somewhere with the ability to destroy everything as if people in all of their imagined glory were nothing and started to find ways to appease his wrath. Ritual sacrifice of farm animals and virgins, killing unbelievers, erecting monuments and building temples dedicated to his glory, etc.

A fairly sensible response given their limited knowledge of the universe and the fact that it actually happened..It would blow our minds if it happened today.

 

[ding]

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

Some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible and hints at part of the reason why at that point in time many people all over the world came to believe that there was an angry God up there somewhere with the ability to destroy the world as if people in all of their imagined glory were nothing and started to find ways to appease his wrath. Ritual sacrifice of farm animals and virgins, killing unbelievers, etc

An angry God?

I don't see that. That is just your perception. They did not see God as angry. Someone today - who did not have complete knowledge - may think they saw God as angry, but they are confusing anger for just. I don't believe at anytime did they not view God as just.

The sacrifices were not meant to appease, they were meant to give praise and thanks. These are two of the pillars of worship.

 

[hobelim]

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

Some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible and hints at part of the reason why at that point in time many people all over the world came to believe that there was an angry God up there somewhere with the ability to destroy the world as if people in all of their imagined glory were nothing and started to find ways to appease his wrath. Ritual sacrifice of farm animals and virgins, killing unbelievers, etc

An angry God?

I don't see that. That is just your perception. They did not see God as angry. Someone today - who did not have complete knowledge - may think they saw God as angry, but they are confusing anger for just. I don't believe at anytime did they not view God as just.

The sacrifices were not meant to appease, they were meant to give praise and thanks. These are two of the pillars of worship.

Ugh.you missed the point completely

 

[ding]

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

Some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible and hints at part of the reason why at that point in time many people all over the world came to believe that there was an angry God up there somewhere with the ability to destroy the world as if people in all of their imagined glory were nothing and started to find ways to appease his wrath. Ritual sacrifice of farm animals and virgins, killing unbelievers, etc

An angry God?

I don't see that. That is just your perception. They did not see God as angry. Someone today - who did not have complete knowledge - may think they saw God as angry, but they are confusing anger for just. I don't believe at anytime did they not view God as just.

The sacrifices were not meant to appease, they were meant to give praise and thanks. These are two of the pillars of worship.

Ugh.you missed the point completely

I didn't miss the point.

I agree that some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible.

I don't agree that the people back then came to believe that there was an angry God.

 

[Taz]

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

I dismiss it (and you) because no real scientist agrees with you. otherwise you'd have a link.

How do YOU explain the fact that every major civilization has an account of a major flood?

Floods happen all the time. Still do.

 

[Taz]

You want to specify 40 days when all it is meant to convey is that the event lasted a long time.

It was such a special event that all ancient civilizations recorded it.

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

Some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible and hints at part of the reason why at that point in time many people all over the world came to believe that there was an angry God up there somewhere with the ability to destroy everything as if people in all of their imagined glory were nothing and started to find ways to appease his wrath. Ritual sacrifice of farm animals and virgins, killing unbelievers, erecting monuments and building temples dedicated to his glory, etc.

A fairly sensible response given their limited knowledge of the universe and the fact that it actually happened..It would blow our minds if it happened today.

You have no real geological proof of a massive meteor strike 6000 years ago. You're completely delusional.

 

[ding]

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

I dismiss it (and you) because no real scientist agrees with you. otherwise you'd have a link.

How do YOU explain the fact that every major civilization has an account of a major flood?

Floods happen all the time. Still do.

Yes, they do. But they didn't pass down all of their accounts of floods. Just the great one that had been passed down from generation to generation for thousands of years. Until one day when it got written down.

 

[ding]

How could ancient civilizations record the flood if it covered everything and killed everyone except Noah's posse?

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

Some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible and hints at part of the reason why at that point in time many people all over the world came to believe that there was an angry God up there somewhere with the ability to destroy everything as if people in all of their imagined glory were nothing and started to find ways to appease his wrath. Ritual sacrifice of farm animals and virgins, killing unbelievers, erecting monuments and building temples dedicated to his glory, etc.

A fairly sensible response given their limited knowledge of the universe and the fact that it actually happened..It would blow our minds if it happened today.

You have no real geological proof of a massive meteor strike 6000 years ago. You're completely delusional.

You are the one who is delusional if you don't believe a major flood happened back in the days of antiquity. They passed down that account for thousands of years from generation to generation until it got written down.

Hell, the account was recorded in the Chinese written language in the forms of symbols.

 

[Taz]

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

I dismiss it (and you) because no real scientist agrees with you. otherwise you'd have a link.

How do YOU explain the fact that every major civilization has an account of a major flood?

Floods happen all the time. Still do.

Yes, they do. But they didn't pass down all of their accounts of floods. Just the great one that had been passed down from generation to generation for thousands of years. Until one day when it got written down.

Means nothing.

 

[Taz]

Again you are reading it literally.

Clearly the fact that all ancient civilizations had an account of a flood tells us there was a major event.

The meteor provides the means.

You want to dismiss this evidence and are looking for any excuse to do so.

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

Some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible and hints at part of the reason why at that point in time many people all over the world came to believe that there was an angry God up there somewhere with the ability to destroy everything as if people in all of their imagined glory were nothing and started to find ways to appease his wrath. Ritual sacrifice of farm animals and virgins, killing unbelievers, erecting monuments and building temples dedicated to his glory, etc.

A fairly sensible response given their limited knowledge of the universe and the fact that it actually happened..It would blow our minds if it happened today.

You have no real geological proof of a massive meteor strike 6000 years ago. You're completely delusional.

You are the one who is delusional if you don't believe a major flood happened back in the days of antiquity. They passed down that account for thousands of years from generation to generation until it got written down.

Hell, the account was recorded in the Chinese written language in the forms of symbols.

I don’t doubt that big floods happened, they still do today.

 

[ding]

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

I dismiss it (and you) because no real scientist agrees with you. otherwise you'd have a link.

How do YOU explain the fact that every major civilization has an account of a major flood?

Floods happen all the time. Still do.

Yes, they do. But they didn't pass down all of their accounts of floods. Just the great one that had been passed down from generation to generation for thousands of years. Until one day when it got written down.

Means nothing.

It means everything. The account was passed down from generation to generation for thousands of years.

 

[ding]

Then link to a real science site that confirms what you say. Even wiki called it speculation.

All such events are speculation. Scientific speculation.

But you seem to be missing the point. The fact that every ancient civilization has an account of a flood tells us that a major flood did occur. The meteor "speculation" provides the smoking gun.

You dismiss it because it destroys your argument. That's your only reason.

Some people would rather dismiss it because it lends credence to the bible and hints at part of the reason why at that point in time many people all over the world came to believe that there was an angry God up there somewhere with the ability to destroy everything as if people in all of their imagined glory were nothing and started to find ways to appease his wrath. Ritual sacrifice of farm animals and virgins, killing unbelievers, erecting monuments and building temples dedicated to his glory, etc.

A fairly sensible response given their limited knowledge of the universe and the fact that it actually happened..It would blow our minds if it happened today.

You have no real geological proof of a massive meteor strike 6000 years ago. You're completely delusional.

You are the one who is delusional if you don't believe a major flood happened back in the days of antiquity. They passed down that account for thousands of years from generation to generation until it got written down.

Hell, the account was recorded in the Chinese written language in the forms of symbols.

I don’t doubt that big floods happened, they still do today.

If it really did rain for anything close to 40 days, that would be much much worse than anything that has ever happened since.

 

[Taz]

I dismiss it (and you) because no real scientist agrees with you. otherwise you'd have a link.

How do YOU explain the fact that every major civilization has an account of a major flood?

Floods happen all the time. Still do.

Yes, they do. But they didn't pass down all of their accounts of floods. Just the great one that had been passed down from generation to generation for thousands of years. Until one day when it got written down.

Means nothing.

It means everything. The account was passed down from generation to generation for thousands of years.

And enhanced many times along the way.