Was Comey Fired Because FBI Sights Were Turning Toward Trump’s Russian Mobster Business Ties?

[Zorro!]

Comey was pressured by Trump supporters to announce the investigation of Hillary's emails.

There was little more than negligence in Hillary's case, Trump hides evidence of his own wrongdoing.

Poor Comey, destroyed his reputation and that of the FBI kowtowing to Republicans.... Sad!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Comey was pressured by Trump supporters to announce the investigation of Hillary's emails.

There was little more than negligence in Hillary's case, Trump hides evidence of his own wrongdoing.

You mean besides the 33,000 emails she destroyed

 

[georgephillip]

Investigating campaign collusion is not exactly the FBI’s expertise, but organized crime is.

What is President Donald Trump trying to hide?

That’s the question on everyone’s mind since Trump fired FBI director James Comey on Tuesday. What’s been learned since that Watergate scandal-invoking bombshell dropped has only underlined the question.

Comey had been seeking more funds to go where the investigation was taking the FBI, media reported Wednesday. The Justice Department called this assertion “totally false,” affirming that whatever trail Comey’s FBI was following will likely go no further.

There are also several federal and state grand jury investigations underway, it was revealed Wednesday, first reported by two bloggers—Claude Taylor with ties to the Democratic Party and Louise Mensch with ties to right-wing sites. What these panels are specifically looking at is not known, although foreign surveillancesearch warrants reportedly have been issued. The presumption is they are tracing the Trump campaign’s collusion with Russia to win the presidency.

As the details around all these developments swirl—including claims by Republicans there is nothing to all of this—a tantalizing observation is emerging from investigative reporters who have been following Trump’s organized crime ties for months. What if the FBI investigation was heading into Trump’s mobster-connected business empire, including his partnerships with Russian oligarchs, where the president has broken racketeering, money-laundering and organized crime laws? This is the FBI’s expertise, not the murkier and harder-to-prove charge of Russian campaign collusion.

Much More: Was Comey Fired Because the FBI’s Sights Were Turning Toward Trump’s Russian Mobster-Connected Business Ties?

This is yet another reason why we must see Trump's tax returns!

You really are retarded, aren't you. Mewler found nothing you twerp.

Lifelong Republican fixer Robert Mueller found "sweeping and systematic" attempts by Russians to influence the outcome of the 2016 US election WITHOUT crossing Trump's red line:

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...rt-doesnt-cross-red-line-into-trumps-finances

"SPECIAL COUNSEL Robert Mueller's sweeping report into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election does not appear to tap into President Donald Trump's personal finances – a vein of inquiry the president had said would constitute crossing a red line.


"READ:

"The Mueller Report Findings in Full ]"

 

[xyz]

Comey was pressured by Trump supporters to announce the investigation of Hillary's emails.

There was little more than negligence in Hillary's case, Trump hides evidence of his own wrongdoing.

You mean besides the 33,000 emails she destroyed

It's a lie, she didn't.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...mails-after-getting-a-subpoena-from-congress/

and if you really want to go there
Donald Trump's companies destroyed or hid documents in defiance of court orders

 

[westwall]

Investigating campaign collusion is not exactly the FBI’s expertise, but organized crime is.

What is President Donald Trump trying to hide?

That’s the question on everyone’s mind since Trump fired FBI director James Comey on Tuesday. What’s been learned since that Watergate scandal-invoking bombshell dropped has only underlined the question.

Comey had been seeking more funds to go where the investigation was taking the FBI, media reported Wednesday. The Justice Department called this assertion “totally false,” affirming that whatever trail Comey’s FBI was following will likely go no further.

There are also several federal and state grand jury investigations underway, it was revealed Wednesday, first reported by two bloggers—Claude Taylor with ties to the Democratic Party and Louise Mensch with ties to right-wing sites. What these panels are specifically looking at is not known, although foreign surveillancesearch warrants reportedly have been issued. The presumption is they are tracing the Trump campaign’s collusion with Russia to win the presidency.

As the details around all these developments swirl—including claims by Republicans there is nothing to all of this—a tantalizing observation is emerging from investigative reporters who have been following Trump’s organized crime ties for months. What if the FBI investigation was heading into Trump’s mobster-connected business empire, including his partnerships with Russian oligarchs, where the president has broken racketeering, money-laundering and organized crime laws? This is the FBI’s expertise, not the murkier and harder-to-prove charge of Russian campaign collusion.

Much More: Was Comey Fired Because the FBI’s Sights Were Turning Toward Trump’s Russian Mobster-Connected Business Ties?

This is yet another reason why we must see Trump's tax returns!

You really are retarded, aren't you. Mewler found nothing you twerp.

Lifelong Republican fixer Robert Mueller found "sweeping and systematic" attempts by Russians to influence the outcome of the 2016 US election WITHOUT crossing Trump's red line:

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...rt-doesnt-cross-red-line-into-trumps-finances

"SPECIAL COUNSEL Robert Mueller's sweeping report into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election does not appear to tap into President Donald Trump's personal finances – a vein of inquiry the president had said would constitute crossing a red line.


"READ:

"The Mueller Report Findings in Full ]"

And no evidence Trump, or his people did anything criminal. In fact his report stipulates they did the opposite. Why did you leave that out, asshole?

 

[Lakhota]

Investigating campaign collusion is not exactly the FBI’s expertise, but organized crime is.

What is President Donald Trump trying to hide?

That’s the question on everyone’s mind since Trump fired FBI director James Comey on Tuesday. What’s been learned since that Watergate scandal-invoking bombshell dropped has only underlined the question.

Comey had been seeking more funds to go where the investigation was taking the FBI, media reported Wednesday. The Justice Department called this assertion “totally false,” affirming that whatever trail Comey’s FBI was following will likely go no further.

There are also several federal and state grand jury investigations underway, it was revealed Wednesday, first reported by two bloggers—Claude Taylor with ties to the Democratic Party and Louise Mensch with ties to right-wing sites. What these panels are specifically looking at is not known, although foreign surveillancesearch warrants reportedly have been issued. The presumption is they are tracing the Trump campaign’s collusion with Russia to win the presidency.

As the details around all these developments swirl—including claims by Republicans there is nothing to all of this—a tantalizing observation is emerging from investigative reporters who have been following Trump’s organized crime ties for months. What if the FBI investigation was heading into Trump’s mobster-connected business empire, including his partnerships with Russian oligarchs, where the president has broken racketeering, money-laundering and organized crime laws? This is the FBI’s expertise, not the murkier and harder-to-prove charge of Russian campaign collusion.

Much More: Was Comey Fired Because the FBI’s Sights Were Turning Toward Trump’s Russian Mobster-Connected Business Ties?

This is yet another reason why we must see Trump's tax returns!

You really are retarded, aren't you. Mewler found nothing you twerp.

Lifelong Republican fixer Robert Mueller found "sweeping and systematic" attempts by Russians to influence the outcome of the 2016 US election WITHOUT crossing Trump's red line:

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...rt-doesnt-cross-red-line-into-trumps-finances

"SPECIAL COUNSEL Robert Mueller's sweeping report into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election does not appear to tap into President Donald Trump's personal finances – a vein of inquiry the president had said would constitute crossing a red line.


"READ:

"The Mueller Report Findings in Full ]"

And no evidence Trump, or his people did anything criminal. In fact his report stipulates they did the opposite. Why did you leave that out, asshole?

A "crime" is not required. Out laws were written after the Constitution was ratified.

 

[westwall]

Investigating campaign collusion is not exactly the FBI’s expertise, but organized crime is.

What is President Donald Trump trying to hide?

That’s the question on everyone’s mind since Trump fired FBI director James Comey on Tuesday. What’s been learned since that Watergate scandal-invoking bombshell dropped has only underlined the question.

Comey had been seeking more funds to go where the investigation was taking the FBI, media reported Wednesday. The Justice Department called this assertion “totally false,” affirming that whatever trail Comey’s FBI was following will likely go no further.

There are also several federal and state grand jury investigations underway, it was revealed Wednesday, first reported by two bloggers—Claude Taylor with ties to the Democratic Party and Louise Mensch with ties to right-wing sites. What these panels are specifically looking at is not known, although foreign surveillancesearch warrants reportedly have been issued. The presumption is they are tracing the Trump campaign’s collusion with Russia to win the presidency.

As the details around all these developments swirl—including claims by Republicans there is nothing to all of this—a tantalizing observation is emerging from investigative reporters who have been following Trump’s organized crime ties for months. What if the FBI investigation was heading into Trump’s mobster-connected business empire, including his partnerships with Russian oligarchs, where the president has broken racketeering, money-laundering and organized crime laws? This is the FBI’s expertise, not the murkier and harder-to-prove charge of Russian campaign collusion.

Much More: Was Comey Fired Because the FBI’s Sights Were Turning Toward Trump’s Russian Mobster-Connected Business Ties?

This is yet another reason why we must see Trump's tax returns!

You really are retarded, aren't you. Mewler found nothing you twerp.

Lifelong Republican fixer Robert Mueller found "sweeping and systematic" attempts by Russians to influence the outcome of the 2016 US election WITHOUT crossing Trump's red line:

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...rt-doesnt-cross-red-line-into-trumps-finances

"SPECIAL COUNSEL Robert Mueller's sweeping report into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election does not appear to tap into President Donald Trump's personal finances – a vein of inquiry the president had said would constitute crossing a red line.


"READ:

"The Mueller Report Findings in Full ]"

And no evidence Trump, or his people did anything criminal. In fact his report stipulates they did the opposite. Why did you leave that out, asshole?

A "crime" is not required. Out laws were written after the Constitution was ratified.

Are you stoned? Mewler stipulated that neither Trump, nor his people engaged in any collusion unlike your bitch, the shrilary.

 

[georgephillip]

And no evidence Trump, or his people did anything criminal. In fact his report stipulates they did the opposite. Why did you leave that out, asshole?

Because Mueller's report says no such thing.

It said the investigation could NOT exonerate Trump from obstruction charges, for example.

And it did not have access to Trump's financial documents:

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...rt-doesnt-cross-red-line-into-trumps-finances

"But the two-volume report does not appear to assess the president's personal finances or those of the Trump Organization, including past business deals with Deutsche Bank.

"The German lender has been a top target for Democrats who question why it lent Trump more than $2 billion since the early 2000s for various property development projects when other banks wouldn't, especially given his track record of bankruptcy.

"Separately, the bank has drawn scrutiny from both sides of the aisle for its role in a $10 billion Russian money-laundering scheme.

"Democrats, in particular, have expressed concern as to whether the loans made to Trump compromised the president in any way, potentially establishing leverage that Russia could exploit or whether any of that money was laundered through The Trump Organization."

 

[westwall]

And no evidence Trump, or his people did anything criminal. In fact his report stipulates they did the opposite. Why did you leave that out, asshole?

Because Mueller's report says no such thing.

It said the investigation could NOT exonerate Trump from obstruction charges, for example.

And it did not have access to Trump's financial documents:

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...rt-doesnt-cross-red-line-into-trumps-finances

"But the two-volume report does not appear to assess the president's personal finances or those of the Trump Organization, including past business deals with Deutsche Bank.

"The German lender has been a top target for Democrats who question why it lent Trump more than $2 billion since the early 2000s for various property development projects when other banks wouldn't, especially given his track record of bankruptcy.

"Separately, the bank has drawn scrutiny from both sides of the aisle for its role in a $10 billion Russian money-laundering scheme.

"Democrats, in particular, have expressed concern as to whether the loans made to Trump compromised the president in any way, potentially establishing leverage that Russia could exploit or whether any of that money was laundered through The Trump Organization."

By not finding evidence of any crime, there is nothing to be exonerated for you ignorant fool. There was NO evidence, thus there was no crime to file a charge on. Exoneration only occurs from a trial you boob.

Mewler tossed that in to keep idiots, like you, hoping.

 

[georgephillip]

By not finding evidence of any crime, there is nothing to be exonerated for you ignorant fool. There was NO evidence, thus there was no crime to file a charge on. Exoneration only occurs from a trial you boob.

There was sweeping and systematic evidence of Russian interference in 2016 all of it in Trump's favor; there was no evidence anyone in Trump's campaign conspired with the Russians,

As to obstruction...

Read the Mueller Report: Searchable Document and Index

"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct.

"The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment.

"At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state1.

"Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

 

[justoffal]

Comey was fired because he was fixing to release the super duper true fact of who killed Kennedy and that was Trumps dad who hated Kennedy because he blamed him for the disappearance of that fat fuck fuck Hoffa.

Nah...the real truth is that Trump is a closet gay and Comey had rebuffed his advances too many times for him to bear it.

Jo

 

[justoffal]

i give up....was he?....

We can't be sure - until we see his tax returns.

You'll never be sure of anything no matter what you see.

Jo

 

[The Original Tree]

Comey was pressured by Trump supporters to announce the investigation of Hillary's emails.

There was little more than negligence in Hillary's case, Trump hides evidence of his own wrongdoing.

You mean besides the 33,000 emails she destroyed

Talk about Obstruction of Evidence, and Obstruction of Justice, and COMEY allowed her to do this despite two Federal Court Orders Ordering her NOT TO.

 

[The Original Tree]

i give up....was he?....

We can't be sure - until we see his tax returns.

You'll never be sure of anything no matter what you see.

Jo

He's not even sure of what bathroom to use.

 

[Zorro!]

Comey was fired because he was fixing to release the super duper true fact of who killed Kennedy and that was Trumps dad who hated Kennedy because he blamed him for the disappearance of that fat fuck fuck Hoffa.

Nah...the real truth is that Trump is a closet gay and Comey had rebuffed his advances too many times for him to bear it.

Jo

I have not clue why you thought something that vulgar and ridiculous was worth sharing. .