frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 46,452
- 9,937
Which is not illegal and nobody gives a rat fuck about that.
Jesus. What the fuck? Opposition research is now a crime?
ESPECIALLY because this thread is about Clinton/DNC PAYING for a political opposition hit piece that they tried to pass off as US National Intel product. They BOUGHT stories from Russian spies !!!!! How is that NOT collusion?
Well, the problem with your whole thing is that buying information from Russians is far different from Russians putting information into the press.
Not really. Whatever they injected was in the "noise level" of the campaign. NONE of it reached a life of it's own.
But you need to answer a question for me?
It's been suggested that Trump should be impeached for THINKING about doing business in Russia. So which is worse? --- pondering building a Hotel there? Or PAYING FUCKING RUSSIAN SPIES to make up shit about your opponent?
Need an answer to see if you realize the irony of your position..
No, no one is saying he should be impeached for doing business in Russia (unless they're a nutjob), what they're trying to show is that Trump had connections with Russia which might show that he was getting help from the Russians.
It's gone FAR beyond that. The media has suggested that ANY business dealings in Russia would be evidence of conflict of interest. TONS of media spew and USMB posts suggesting that. At least 15 threads on discussions Trump had with ANY Russian investors.
Did you answer my question? Don't think that you did. Why are you avoiding it? Which is worse?
Actually I think they've simply been trying to build a case. However they also know that any story about this sells. So they sell, because it's what some people want to hear.
I really don't see the need to answer your question. It's a cherry picked question.