Washington Post Doxxes Libs Of Tik Tok

[MisterBeale]

just as it's legal to find out who has created an online movement.

No. . . you are wrong.

Taking illegal steps to violate someone's privacy is not legal.

Freedom from consequences is not a right

If a person wants to publish thoughts and ideas anonymously? Yeah, that sure as hell is a right. Pen names are as old as civil society.

Speaking and writing anonymously, and thus, free from the wraith of emotional mobs, is, indeed a right.

In fact, former spooks in the commonwealth, if former spies wish to publish fiction, they are required, by law to do so under a pen name, and attempting to reveal the true identity of one is a crime.

Your assertion that folks have the "right," to give consequences, either physical, financial, etc., to those with whom they disagree on those ideas? Is not, in fact, based on law. . . the reverse is the reality.

Cyber-bullying and Cyber-crime is real, and what you are suggesting is just a form of cyber-crime entering the real world.

Your posts, clearly mark you as ANTIFA/BLACK-BLOC material.

Folks fight ideas with ideas, and violence with violence.

 

[ArrojaLaBomba]

But. . . she remained anonymous.

That is like saying, a rape victim that dresses provocatively deserves to be raped.

You are a hypocrite.

No? Besides, how is a journalist coming to your house the same as being raped?

 

[Augustine_]

No. . . you are wrong.

Taking illegal steps to violate someone's privacy is not legal.



If a person wants to publish thoughts and ideas anonymously? Yeah, that sure as hell is a right. Pen names are as old as civil society.

Speaking and writing anonymously, and thus, free from the wraith of emotional mobs, is, indeed a right.

In fact, former spooks in the commonwealth, if former spies wish to publish fiction, they are required, by law to do so under a pen name, and attempting to reveal the true identity of one is a crime.

Your assertion that folks have the "right," to give consequences, either physical, financial, etc., to those with whom they disagree on those ideas? Is not, in fact, based on law. . . the reverse is the reality.

Cyber-bullying and Cyber-crime is real, and what you are suggesting is just a form of cyber-crime entering the real world.

Your posts, clearly mark you as ANTIFA/BLACK-BLOC material.

Folks fight ideas with ideas, and violence with violence.

Freedom from consequences. Bliss.

 

[MisterBeale]

No it's not. Choosing to be a famous online influencer is not the same as being raped. Good fucking grief.

ahhh. . . I see, so victim blaming is all right if they are famous, and politically dangerous to your cause, otherwise, not so much. .

 

[MisterBeale]

Freedom from consequences. Bliss.

What type of consequence do you imagine a person should have for speaking their mind freely in a free nation, why don't you be honest? This account? Not even really speaking, just re-posting other "leftist," posts. . . what type of consequence should this person have for that?

 

[Bleipriester]

I wanted to see some of the liberal stuff she retweeded but it is too disgusting. Its graphic.

 

[MisterBeale]

No? Besides, how is a journalist coming to your house the same as being raped?

You gotta be really obtuse if you don't understand the world of doxing.

"In 2016, a “troll storm” hit Tanya Gersh, a Jewish wedding planner and real estate agent in Montana. The storm began when Andrew Anglin, the editor of the Neo-Nazi publication The Daily Stormer, published her photo, phone numbers, email addresses, and social media profiles, including one belonging to her young son.

Her phone rang incessantly, and she received death threats at her work email along with hundreds of anti-Semitic messages, including a Photoshopped image of her family superimposed above a Nazi concentration camp.

Gersh’s experience is emblematic of a type of harassment called doxing. Slang for doc-dropping, doxing is the process of making someone’s address, contact information, identity, or other information public, usually in order to intimidate, harass, or incite public outrage. The term dates back to the mid-2000s, but doxing has since become a well-known harassment tactic. There aren’t clear statistics on how many people have been doxed, but a 2021 report from the Anti-Defamation League estimates 9 percent of Americans have experienced doxing.. . ."

Should doxing be illegal?

via thenextweb.comby The Markup In 2016, a “troll storm” hit Tanya Gersh, a Jewish wedding planner and real estate agent in Montana. The storm began when Andrew Anglin, the editor of the Neo-Nazi p…

clinics.law.harvard.edu

Far right extremists have done this shit to the left. . . and now the far-left thinks this is acceptable? What the hell kind of clown world are we living in now?

 

[Augustine_]

What type of consequence do you imagine a person should have for speaking their mind freely in a free nation, why don't you be honest? This account? Not even really speaking, just re-posting other "leftist," posts. . . what type of consequence should this person have for that?

Nothing. Same as I wish a child placing their hand on a burning stove had no consequences for them, either. The only way to illegalize legal consequences is bigger, more massive gubmint. Is that what you want?

 

[ArrojaLaBomba]

You gotta be really obtuse if you don't understand the world of doxing.

"In 2016, a “troll storm” hit Tanya Gersh, a Jewish wedding planner and real estate agent in Montana. The storm began when Andrew Anglin, the editor of the Neo-Nazi publication The Daily Stormer, published her photo, phone numbers, email addresses, and social media profiles, including one belonging to her young son.

Her phone rang incessantly, and she received death threats at her work email along with hundreds of anti-Semitic messages, including a Photoshopped image of her family superimposed above a Nazi concentration camp.

Gersh’s experience is emblematic of a type of harassment called doxing. Slang for doc-dropping, doxing is the process of making someone’s address, contact information, identity, or other information public, usually in order to intimidate, harass, or incite public outrage. The term dates back to the mid-2000s, but doxing has since become a well-known harassment tactic. There aren’t clear statistics on how many people have been doxed, but a 2021 report from the Anti-Defamation League estimates 9 percent of Americans have experienced doxing.. . ."

Should doxing be illegal?

via thenextweb.comby The Markup In 2016, a “troll storm” hit Tanya Gersh, a Jewish wedding planner and real estate agent in Montana. The storm began when Andrew Anglin, the editor of the Neo-Nazi p…

clinics.law.harvard.edu

Far right extremists have done this shit to the left. . . and now the far-left thinks this is acceptable? What the hell kind of clown world are we living in now?

How is this comparable to Chaya Raichik posting her information publicly when registering her website? This is the kind of people that are in her fan club.

 

[Augustine_]

How is this comparable to Chaya Raichik posting her information publicly when registering her website? This is the kind of people that are in her fan club.

She doxxed herself long before anybody else did

 

[ArrojaLaBomba]

She doxxed herself long before anybody else did

It's like JK Rowling's public estate all over again.

 

[MisterBeale]

How is this comparable to Chaya Raichik posting her information publicly when registering her website? This is the kind of people that are in her fan club.

When you register for an account at a website, that is not public information.

When folks register here, they do so with an implicit understanding, that their information will remain anonymous.

This is the kind of people that are in her fan club.

What do you know?

I don't think all LGBTQ+ people are the same, so when you stereo-type all folks on the right as "Daily Stormer," type folks? It shows your ignorance. No conversation can be had with folks that write in such hyperbole and absolutes.

 

[MisterBeale]

Nothing. Same as I wish a child placing their hand on a burning stove had no consequences for them, either. The only way to illegalize legal consequences is bigger, more massive gubmint. Is that what you want?

" illegalize legal consequences,"
wth does that even mean?

WHAT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES?

 

[ArrojaLaBomba]

When you register for an account at a website, that is not public information.

When folks register here, they do so with an implicit understanding, that their information will remain anonymous.


What do you know?

I don't think all LGBTQ+ people are the same, so when you stereo-type all folks on the right as "Daily Stormer," type folks? It shows your ignorance. No conversation can be had with folks that write in such hyperbole and absolutes.

She didn't register for an account on a website, she registered a website. And didn't protect her information like she should have. And believe me, I know that every right winger is either a stromtropper, the fuhrer, or their supporters.

 

[AMart]

How is this comparable to Chaya Raichik posting her information publicly when registering her website? This is the kind of people that are in her fan club.

The name registered as the owner is not necessarily the name of the person running it and her Twitter account is anonymous. She never put her name out there. She was doxxed and you it.

 

[ArrojaLaBomba]

The name registered as the owner is not necessarily the name of the person running it and her Twitter account is anonymous. She never put her name out there. She was doxxed and you it.

But the information on her website was not, so sorry that's what the nazi gets for not being careful.

 

[AMart]

But the information on her website was not, so sorry that's what the nazi gets for not being careful.

She didn't disclose her name on the website. One has to use search engines to find out an entity that registered a website. It doxxing and you know it.

 

[AMart]

But the information on her website was not, so sorry that's what the nazi gets for not being careful.

She's Jewish wow another Jew Nazi. You leftists are such perjorative tossing pussies. Fuck you all she does is repost leftist videos.

 

[ArrojaLaBomba]

She didn't disclose her name on the website. One has to use search engines to find out an entity that registered a website. It doxxing and you know it.

Yeah, that's not something that would happen if you get a domain that protects your information.

 

[ArrojaLaBomba]

She's Jewish wow another Jew Nazi. You leftists are such perjorative tossing pussies. Fuck you all she does is repost leftist videos.

Anyone can be a nazi.